His crowning achievement was how bad he underperformed throughout the years in the post season with the talent we had.
Another narrative that gets completely overblown.
Overall, it's frustrating Iowa hasn't had a couple more tourney wins under Fran. But opponents have talent too. That's why they're in the tournament.
Iowa was an underdog in six games. Auburn, Tennessee, Cincinnati, Villanova, Gonzaga, and Tennessee (first of two vs Vols). Cincinnati was the only win.
Iowa was favored in five games. Richmond, Oregon, Grand Canyon, Temple, Davidson. With Richmond and Oregon as losses.
So in seven tournaments Iowa has lost two games they weren't supposed to lose, and won one game they weren't supposed to win.
Again, the overall lack of tourney runs in seven tourneys, and 15 years carries its frustration. But the "tourney failure" narrative is overblown. It would be more accurate to criticize the program for not having overall in 15 years been good enough to achieve better tourney seeds and more invites. Because again, the actual tourney games have only varied one game from what would have been expected (2 losses as a favorite, and 1 win as a dog)