ADVERTISEMENT

2019-2020 BIG Championship- Why not Iowa??

wbrhawkeye

HB MVP
Jun 12, 2012
1,097
1,960
113
Iowa is very much still in the running. Let's shock the world and win the first championship since 1979.

Fran should be coach of the year in the Big 10 so far. If we win the title, he would be national coach of the year.
 
If we could go back and play the PSU and Nebby games with a healthy CJ, I think we’re sitting at 7-1 right now with three road wins. If that had happened I think you’re on to something. But we are going to lose between 4-8 games from here on out which won’t be enough to win the conference. Best case scenario, which is really tough, is 13-7 and I think you need to get to 15 wins this year for a shot at the title.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_i8nzeu2gbf0ba
Fran needs to get over the monumental hump that is February basketball.

This team seems gutsy and they don't have alot of "quit" in them. The only game they absolutely quit on was the DePaul game way back in November. Maybe they are built to make a run.

The season will be a success even if they don't win the B10. I just want them to remain competitive, in the race till the very end.
 
Gutsy teams win championships. And teams with, for want of a better term, chemistry. And, at least two pure shooters. And pitbull point guards.
Oh, and teams with unstoppable inside players like Garza.
I won't be even mildly surprised if we finally win the conference title this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_i8nzeu2gbf0ba
Really looking like a top 4 team in the conference right now.

Also nice to get MSU and Rutgers once.
 
Iowa is very much still in the running.

I think Iowa is effectively 3 games behind Illinois, so not really in the race yet. Winning at home or at NW or Neb is like holding serve. Losing at Nebraska puts Iowa down a break. Winning on the road, other than at NW or Neb, is like breaking serve, so Illinois is up 2 breaks. Wisconsin is also up a break, and several are on serve.

There’s still time for Iowa, but until a non-NW/Neb road victory or two, hard to think Iowa is really a contender.
 
Last edited:
[QUOTE="CO_hawk, post: 7317001, member: 12020" . . . Also nice to get MSU and Rutgers once.[/QUOTE]

Agree. Rutgers once at home and MSU once on the road is ideal. MSU might be the most likely home loss in the conference, and Iowa avoided that. Playing at the RAC this year is also a daunting task, and Iowa avoided that.
 
Fran needs to get over the monumental hump that is February basketball.

This team seems gutsy and they don't have alot of "quit" in them. The only game they absolutely quit on was the DePaul game way back in November. Maybe they are built to make a run.

The season will be a success even if they don't win the B10. I just want them to remain competitive, in the race till the very end.

Yeah it's hard to envision a scenario where a team wins the conference this year and loses at Nebraska. It's just a road game that all the other good teams likely win this year.

That said, there is no game left on the schedule that is unwinnable, and I'm including the games at East Lansing, Illinois, West Lafeyette, and Maryland.

In terms of the February swoon thing, that is part reality and part narrative, such as KF never plays young guys. If Iowa has a worse record the second 10 games of the conference schedule compared to the first 10, does it mean Iowa played worse, or that the schedule the second 10 games was more difficult? The final 10 games for Iowa this year include road games at Indiana, at Purdue, at Illinois, at Michigan State, at Minnesota. That is brutal. Home games with Illinois, Ohio State, Penn State, Nebraska and Purdue. One bad team in 10 games, Nebraska. If you told me right now Iowa goes 5-5 with that I am happy.

No doubt there have been some Fran fades. Last year they went 5-5 in the final 10, and lost 5 of 6. Some of it was schedule related, some was bad luck (2 OT losses).
2017-18 the team was just bad. 4-14 in conference, and they actually won 3 of their last 10, which was better than 1-7 in the first 8.
2016-17, 7-3 in the last 10. 10-8 in conference. Won last 4 regular season games, including 2 against ranked opponents on the road. Not a fade.
2015-16. 5-5 last 10, but this was from a perch of being ranked in Top 5 and leading the league. Lost 5 of 6 at one point. Was Fran's best shot at winning the league.
2014-15. 7-3 last 10, including winning 6 straight. This was when Aaron White went nuts. Not a fade. Combination of Aaron White playing out of his mind and the schedule easing up. Schedule included 2 with Northwestern, Rutgers, Penn State, and Illinois, all of whom were bad.
2013-14. 4-6 in last 10, and lost 5 of the last 6. Could be classified as a fade. This was when Patrick was undergoing the cancer stuff. Lost tons of close games (notice a trend?).
2012-13. Went 6-4 in last 10, and 6 of the last 8. Was overall 9-9 in conference, so team didn't fade but got better. This was the infamous loss to MSU in Big 10 tournament.
2011-12. 5-5 in last 10. 8-10 overall in conference. Fran's first NIT team. Can't really be a fade, team was what it was.

2013-14 and 2015-16 set the narrative, as those were talented teams that left some wins on the table. But Fran has also had seasons such as 14-15 and 16-17 which finished really well.

I will enjoy watching this team. They play hard and share the ball and enjoy each other's success.
 
Love the thought. This team could also make a sweet 16 run, which would be amazing

THIS

We're currently slated as a 4 seed. If 4/5/6 seed pans out, I think this team is as close as a shoe in to win two games as I've seen since the late 80's.

Trust me -- nobody wants to face Garza and this floor full of shooters in March.

As for a regular season league title... MSU is going to lose at least a few more games, and I honestly think we sweep Illinois. It's not crazy at all to think we could pull it off. Have to win some on the road that nobody expects -- starting with overrated Maryland.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT