No, I read the article. I claimed it came from nature, so I had to post a link to nature or people would have freaked out and claimed I was lying. Lol.
No. You did not.
Trump is set to make over 4 billion on the truth social deal lol
They are talking a slight noticed warming at night at the actual local wind farms, not “causing global warming”, Re Re.Sorry, I forgot you guys don't do any research.
Impacts of wind farms on land surface temperature - Nature Climate Change
There is increasing interest in the possible impacts of wind farms on regional weather and climate. Focusing on three large wind farms located in Texas, USA, this study finds evidence for a significant warming trend at night-time and also a small warming effect at daytime over wind farms.www.nature.com
aren't you a doctor? Or am I thinking of someone else? To claim that wind farms cause global warming is some loony ass shit.
There is lots of research out there about this stuff. There are experts in the field who say the same thing I am saying. Unfortunately, it is taboo to discuss this topic because it goes against the left's climate change narrative. I am a believer of science. I want to debate real science, not just push a specific narrative.
www.sciencenews.org
That link is to a silly hypothetical article about the REGIONAL temperature changes that COULD happen in the Midwest IF we decided to make wind power the source of ALL electricity in the US. And even then, it is not global warming. But as she says at the end "Still, the study’s scenario is unlikely: Even within a fossil fuel–free world, power generation would probably include a mix of wind, solar and geothermal energy sources. And eliminating fossil fuels would reduce carbon dioxide emissions, ultimately conferring long-term benefits to the planet."There is lots of research out there about this stuff. There are experts in the field who say the same thing I am saying. Unfortunately, it is taboo to discuss this topic because it goes against the left's climate change narrative. I am a believer of science. I want to debate real science, not just push a specific narrative.
How wind power could contribute to a warming climate
If the United States had enough wind turbines to generate all of its power, they would warm the country by 0.24 degrees Celsius on average.
Lets suppose the research you are pointing out is true: wind turbines, (if enough to meet all our power needs) would increase temps .24 C. (suppose means assume)There is lots of research out there about this stuff. There are experts in the field who say the same thing I am saying. Unfortunately, it is taboo to discuss this topic because it goes against the left's climate change narrative. I am a believer of science. I want to debate real science, not just push a specific narrative.
How wind power could contribute to a warming climate
If the United States had enough wind turbines to generate all of its power, they would warm the country by 0.24 degrees Celsius on average.
There is lots of research out there about this stuff. There are experts in the field who say the same thing I am saying. Unfortunately, it is taboo to discuss this topic because it goes against the left's climate change narrative. I am a believer of science. I want to debate real science, not just push a specific narrative.
How wind power could contribute to a warming climate
If the United States had enough wind turbines to generate all of its power, they would warm the country by 0.24 degrees Celsius on average.
There is lots of research out there about this stuff. There are experts in the field who say the same thing I am saying. Unfortunately, it is taboo to discuss this topic because it goes against the left's climate change narrative. I am a believer of science. I want to debate real science, not just push a specific narrative.
How wind power could contribute to a warming climate
If the United States had enough wind turbines to generate all of its power, they would warm the country by 0.24 degrees Celsius on average.
I am not doing the research on this stuff, this is coming from real scientists. Unfortunately, these scientists are being cancelled because they are not going along with the lefts climate change agenda.
"silly hypothetical", this is the basis of all the climate simulations. People are not dying in mass numbers due to global warming. The hysteria is based off hypothetical predictions that may or may not come true. It is disingenuous to dismiss one hypothetical situation but treat the other as if it is written in stone.
I work at a research hospital in medicine. There are a lot of people on here that may identify me if I give my position and credentials. You can take that for what its worth.
You forgot one
beatofhawaii.com
No, not as it pertains to the global warming scam. However, I am concerned about how the left has decided to allow crime to run rampant and is allowing terrorists and gang members to walk across our national border.
On most posts, I picture Joes Place, laying on the floor kicking and screaming like a 2 year old yelling I'm right, I'm right, I'm right..........😪😪😪😪
Wouldn’t it be more constructive to talk about what you’re willing to do to fix climate change rather than post panic porn?
I disagree on multiple levels.
The planet Venus disagrees with this "science assessment" on your part.
Shocker. You’re missing the point again.
"Clauser has not been welcomed everywhere. In July, he was scheduled to deliver a seminar on climate models to the International Monetary Fund’s Independent Evaluation Office, but then the event was “summarily canceled” with no explanation, the CO2 Coalition said in a statement at the time."
Joe blew by Trumps 4 year total in 3. Just sayin.
fiscaldata.treasury.gov
Climate change is part of the SDGs that Obama agreed to in 2015. He has spent billions to address climate change. People who have spent their entire career addressing a specific problem do not willingly admit it was never a problem in the first place. It is the left who have tried to silence the people who disagree with climate change. I tend to believe the people who don't have to censor others to make their point.
I suppose your a Nobel Prize winner as well...
