ADVERTISEMENT

2025-26 Roster - Update Tracker

I like eggs which has as much to do with roster construction as the entire page I just read thru which led Me to the conclusion after listening to my stomach growl it is time for breakfast, Going off res and making biscuits n gravy with copius amounts of a fine reaper hot sauce so My gas after matches some of the opinions above. Wish Me luck
 
Sorry @GunnerHawk ...I tried. :rolleyes:

You may want to start a fresh thread on this topic, since this one has been hi-jacked.

Dumb Ways To Die GIF by FirstAndMonday
Yep, a bunch of fricking boneheads. Not going to start a new thread. Tried to provide something useful. Tying flies for several fishing trips, better things to do. Thanks to those who tried to bring it back on track.
 
That surprises me. It felt we had to play Duke in the second round each year and I thought it was from the 8/9 seed.
Yeah, lost to Duke in '91 (2/7 match up in the 2nd round) and again in '92 (1 vs 9). I feel like that's mostly what people are remembering, but it definitely didn't happen as often as it seems like.
 
Uh, 1987-1999, Big Ten had 9 final four teams and 1 champion (IU in 1987). 2011-2024 the big ten had 8 final four teams.

Dr Tom got beat by the eventual champion every year because he was always a 7 or 8 seed and that's who you end up playing in the second round. Fran was not good, but Tom is not that far above him.
So the Michigan national championship in 1989 never happened?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fan In Black
Yeah, lost to Duke in '91 (2/7 match up in the 2nd round) and again in '92 (1 vs 9). I feel like that's mostly what people are remembering, but it definitely didn't happen as often as it seems like.
I can't remember which of these it was, but one of them turned into a Duke dunk reel. They crucified our press, it was really hard to watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NI hawk
So because people don't know how to read, I am now being accused of "denying" something I never said. You literally can't make this shit up. Try again. This time it's ok to take it as a given that I know what the hell the intent of my own posts have been.

Not sure what you're talking about, but #212 is my first post in this thread that pertains to fan narratives. It seems pretty well communicated that the post is about ridiculous fan narratives.

But evidently there was some misinterpretation that I clarified on a couple of occasions. And evidently people have blatantly disregarded those clarifications and continued to misinterpret my posts. Somehow that's supposed to be on me?

It's very simple. Calling out fans is not the same thing as defending Fran. I don't know how else to say it. Add in the fact that many have brought up the lack of overall tourney achievements in 14 seasons, and I haven't argued against that point with any of them. I even said it was "fine" for someone to have that viewpoint. How is that defending Fran, lmao?

There has been someone liking my posts in this thread. How the hell has he been able to keep up and understand the intentions of my posts? My guess would be because he is not an idiot
How about this. Shut the **** up and let this thread be this thread. Not your dick wagging contest in your quest to be right. Seriously, you have hijacked a thread with your nonsense.
 
How about this. Shut the **** up and let this thread be this thread. Not your dick wagging contest in your quest to be right. Seriously, you have hijacked a thread with your nonsense.
Well you just re-hijacked it, because people haven't been posting about that for a couple days.

And again, maybe if people didn't keep repeating something that had already been covered
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT