ADVERTISEMENT

A Texas school district bans boys from wearing long hair. Now, some students are suing.

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,678
63,112
113
What is this, the early 1960s?:

School officials in Texas forced a 9-year-old boy to serve an in-school suspension for a month, deprived him of recess and normal lunch breaks, and banished him from campus to an alternative school — all to pressure the fourth-grader into getting a haircut, a new lawsuit says.

Still, the boy refused to obey what he believes is an unjust school policy that bans boys from having long hair.
The boy, identified as A.C. in court documents, is one of seven students suing a Texas school district for what they call a discriminatory policy that requires boys — but not girls — to wear short hair. The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas filed the federal lawsuit Thursday on the students’ behalf against the Magnolia Independent School District, which serves some 13,000 students about 40 miles northwest of Houston.



The students, aged 7 to 17, allege that the district’s policy prohibiting boys from wearing long hair is based on gender stereotypes that violate the Constitution. They say administrators apply it unevenly, allowing some boys to wear long hair that violates the district’s grooming standards while punishing others. Those suing the district said that punishment has caused them “immense and irreparable harm.”
“We have warned the district repeatedly that its gender-based hair policy violates the Constitution, but the district continues to derail students’ lives and deny their right to a public education free from discrimination,” Brian Klosterboer, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement provided to The Washington Post.
The rule requires that male students’ hair must be “no longer than the bottom of a dress shirt collar, bottom of the ear, and out of the eyes,” the district’s handbook states.



The school district did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Post about the lawsuit but has previously defended its policy. Officials said the district’s dress code has set different standards for girls and boys for years. “This has been approved by the Texas courts and continues to be used by roughly half the districts in the state of Texas,” district officials told KPRC in August.
That approach to the dress code, district officials added, “reflects the values of our community at large.”
The lawsuit is an escalation in a months-long battle between the students, their parents and school leaders. Several of those students and parents denounced the policy at a school board meeting in late August, just as some of the students were serving the first days of their in-school suspensions. On the day of the meeting, three civil rights groups, including the ACLU, urged the district to end what they called a discriminatory grooming policy, which the ACLU noted in Thursday’s lawsuit can hurt nonbinary students who don’t identify as male, even if that’s what it says on their birth certificate.



The court case comes days after Texas lawmakers passed legislation barring transgender students from playing on sports teams that align with their gender identity. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott lauded the bill as a way to “protect the integrity of Texas high school sports.” A White House spokesman slammed the bill, telling the Dallas Morning News it is “nothing more than bullying disguised as legislation and undermine our nation’s core values.”
Daniel Hoosier was one of the students who denounced Magnolia’s grooming policy at the board meeting. Hoosier, who was 17 at the time, initially resisted cutting his shoulder-length hair. But by the time he spoke to board members, he had “caved” after serving one day of an in-school suspension.
“I feel like I lost a piece of myself when I was forced to cut it,” he told the Houston Chronicle.



Hoosier elaborated when he spoke to a local TV station: “It feels dehumanizing to have school, a government entity, force me to cut my hair and meet their expectations of appearances.”
One of the plaintiffs in the suit, a 15-year-old high school student, said his hair is “one of the only aspects of his life that he has full control over,” especially during the coronavirus pandemic, which killed both his mother and grandmother, according to the lawsuit. Another plaintiff, an 11-year-old fifth-grader, is nonbinary, sometimes expressing as a boy and other times as a girl, but has been subject to the policy because they were assigned male at birth, the lawsuit says. In recent years, the student, identified as T.M., discovered that wearing long hair has become “a critical component” in expressing their gender identity.
Danielle Miller, T.M.'s mother, said in a statement provided to The Post that the district has “lost sight of what’s most important and keeps inflicting harm on our kids.”







“No student should be forced to conform to gender stereotypes or have their education upended because of that student’s gender,” Miller said. “We will not be ignored nor go away quietly while our children are disciplined simply because of their gender.”
The seven Magnolia students accuse district administrators of “vigorously” punishing them. Sanctions have included days, or even weeks, of in-school suspension, according to the lawsuit. For some of the students, officials escalated the punishment by sending them to an alternative school “typically reserved for students who have violated state or federal law or committed serious violations of school policies,” it adds. The district did not provide them transportation to get there, the suit alleges.
In the case of A.C., the 9-year-old boy, being sent to the alternative school led him to temporarily drop out since the district didn’t provide transportation that he had previously received. So, for about two weeks, he has been home-schooled, even as his sister continues to attend classes in the district, the lawsuit states.
But the fourth-grader wants to keep his long hair, which he corrals into a ponytail. It helps him connect to the Latino men in his family who have also grown out their hair, including his father and uncle. “Wearing long hair adds to A.C.’s self-confidence and is an important part of his family heritage,” the lawsuit says.

 
It's a short hair mandate. It helps prevent lice cases.
How will we ever end lice when people won't comply with the mandate?
Holy. Hell.

frozen-elsa.gif
 
To be perfectly honest I think long hair on men or boys looks ridiculous and I absolutely think men/boys should wear short hair.

At the same time that is a personal opinion/preference and I am not nor is the general community really affected when a man or a boy wears long hair. So it seems ridiculous to punish people for it.

Seems to be there is more harm from suspending him (as he missed out on education) than there is from him wearing long hair (A bunch of people see another person not living up to their personal appearance preferences for males.)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
And the sign said "Long-haired freaky people need not apply"
So I tucked my hair up under my hat and I went in to ask him why
He said "You look like a fine upstanding young man, I think you'll do"
So I took off my hat, I said "Imagine that. Huh! Me workin' for you!"
Whoa-oh-oh
Sign, sign, everywhere a sign
Blockin' out the scenery, breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that, can't you read the sign?
 
as a former "long hair" from 6th to 11th grade and then again in college, the dress code rule sucks...

at least my son's elementary school waited until he was in 7th grade before passing a rule that boys could not have artificially colored hair...I don't think they wanted that fight with my wife(no pic)...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I knew a kid back in '87 who was suspended for having long hair. He was from a fly-speck Texas town too. Cops used to stop and harass him because of the hair.

Ahhhh....Texas - it's not what you think. It's worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I knew a kid back in '87 who was suspended for having long hair. He was from a fly-speck Texas town too. Cops used to stop and harass him because of the hair.

Ahhhh....Texas - it's not what you think. It's worse.
God damn Hippies, promoting peace , love and understanding. How are we supposed to make a buck off of that?
 
I knew a kid back in '87 who was suspended for having long hair. He was from a fly-speck Texas town too. Cops used to stop and harass him because of the hair.

Ahhhh....Texas - it's not what you think. It's worse.
That’s why Randall Floyd wouldn’t sign the contract b
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
That’s why Randall Floyd wouldn’t sign the contract b
That coach reminded me of my HS football coach. We didn't have a HS baseball team because the football couch thought it would interfere with football training.
 
To be perfectly honest I think long hair on men or boys looks ridiculous and I absolutely think men/boys should wear short hair.

At the same time that is a personal opinion/preference and I am not nor is the general community really affected when a man or a boy wears long hair. So it seems ridiculous to punish people for it.

Seems to be there is more harm from suspending him (as he missed out on education) than there is from him wearing long hair (A bunch of people see another person not living up to their personal appearance preferences for males.)

Imagine how cool Jesus would have looked with a high and tight and rocking a polo.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT