it depends whether and how much they want the public schools to win championships.That's what Iowa GOP legislators think.
Once again, Iowa taxpayers on the hook for the religious nutjobs who think their kids are too good to go to public school but want the public school to cover the cost of their extracurriculars and playing sports.
- More than one bill would require public schools to allow private school students to participate in extracurricular activities that aren’t offered at their private school.
News about the 2026 governor's race, Iowa legislative happenings, and Steve King
Jan. 27 edition of "KHOI's Capitol Week"open.substack.com
As long as they ( their school) pay(s) for them to offset costs…Those parents are paying the taxes that built the schools, fields and gymnasiums and keep them going. The children are certainly entitled to use them.
And maybe they weren’t. Education involves a lot more than books and scripture.That's fair. Maybe they were putting their kids education ahead of sports.
They already are being forced to 'pay up' - property taxes, sales taxes, state and federal aid, etc.As long as they ( their school) pay(s) for them to offset costs…
Mike…you can’t have your cake and eat it, too. Pay Up.. or send you kid to the school that offers the programs they want to participate in.
Yep… I pay fir roads I never use too… and I pay for schools I nevr use too..They already are being forced to 'pay up' - property taxes, sales taxes, state and federal aid, etc.
So do I. And the point is we PAY for those roads so we should be allowed to drive on them...even if we never do.Yep… I pay fir roads I never use too… and I pay for schools I nevr use too..
Micheal…as my dad was fond of saying..”Life is tough all over!”
Again… what is your point?
Well… those kids parents pay for public schools even if they choose not to use them or their facilities. If they want to “play” then then need to pay… but really doesn’t the public school have a duty to take care of their own as a higher priority? Would this be reciprocal.. since all taxpayers are paying for private schools now?So do I. And the point is we PAY for those roads so we should be allowed to drive on them...even if we never do.
The parents of these kids are already paying for public schools. If St. Thomas High doesn't have a cross country program then the kids sure as hell should be able to run at Jefferson High.
RTorbee was just stirring the pot when he started the thread. RTorbee acting like a R'ded little girl. As usual.
It appears they’re certainly trying
In rural areas this might be harder to be fair, especially for some of the less popular sports like tennis for example, or where participation levels have been dropping such as girls basketball.They'll always try, because the GOP controls the state and no amount of dumb ideas is too many! I also didn't read the article but what kids are trying to play public school sports? Xavier in CR has sports. So does Regina, Assumption, Dowling, Columbus, etc. Most of those schools have sporting programs.
In rural areas this might be harder to be fair, especially for some of the less popular sports like tennis for example, or where participation levels have been dropping such as girls basketball.
Back when I was at Columbus, at least at that time a handful of Bosco students were on our football team because they didn’t have enough to field their own team.
Well… those kids parents pay for public schools even if they choose not to use them or their facilities. If they want to “play” then then need to pay (They already ARE paying). but really doesn’t the public school have a duty to take care of their own as a higher priority? Would this be reciprocal.. since all taxpayers are paying for private schools now? (I have no problem with reciprocity. After all, Catholic schools started taking government money a long time ago).
I think it's the super small "bible" schools that are now getting money.They'll always try, because the GOP controls the state and no amount of dumb ideas is too many! I also didn't read the article but what kids are trying to play public school sports? Xavier in CR has sports. So does Regina, Assumption, Dowling, Columbus, etc. Most of those schools have sporting programs.
If the parents of said Private school kids are still paying their taxes that support the public schools, then I do not see a problem. Now, if they are NOT paying their taxes that support the public schools, then heck no.That's what Iowa GOP legislators think.
Once again, Iowa taxpayers on the hook for the religious nutjobs who think their kids are too good to go to public school but want the public school to cover the cost of their extracurriculars and playing sports.
- More than one bill would require public schools to allow private school students to participate in extracurricular activities that aren’t offered at their private school.
News about the 2026 governor's race, Iowa legislative happenings, and Steve King
Jan. 27 edition of "KHOI's Capitol Week"open.substack.com
I already brought that up. I don’t know of any private high schools in Iowa that don’t have the major sports. Now they might not all have tennis or soccer or some other similar sport. I’m guessing a couple of extra tennis balls doesn’t cost too much.They'll always try, because the GOP controls the state and no amount of dumb ideas is too many! I also didn't read the article but what kids are trying to play public school sports? Xavier in CR has sports. So does Regina, Assumption, Dowling, Columbus, etc. Most of those schools have sporting programs.
Not anymore. No parent is paying $7,500 in taxes to their local schools. You can't find anyone paying that much in state taxes at all.No brainer.
They pay taxes and should be entitled to services they need.
It's not hard to figure out you didn't play football in high school.And if private school A doesn’t have an athletic program and we are talking about a public school playing 8 man football. I’m guessing it won’t be too many additional kids added to the football team. Nevertheless, you continue to avoid telling me why changing a class size from 8 man to 11 man costs more. You don’t pay a fee to be a certain size school in athletics or any extra curricular activity.
I disagree if the public school is not in the highest class for the sport. The public school must also include the private school enrollment in their classification.I wouldn’t be opposed to this bill. When I was in high school had several kids go to West for their swim team for example.
As @binsfeldcyhawk2 mentioned earlier, I think a reasonable compromise would be the parents would have to pay an additional fee for their kid to participate.
Public schools rarely win championships with private school students. It's the exact opposite. Hello Dowling.it depends whether and how much they want the public schools to win championships.
It’s not hard to figure out you don’t know a damn thing about me. FYI I played football, basketball and was in track. Was all district my junior and senior year in football as well.It's not hard to figure out you didn't play football in high school.
Have a feeling that this impacts smaller schools more than larger ones.I disagree if the public school is not in the highest class for the sport. The public school must also include the private school enrollment in their classification.
That's the point I was making. A public school shouldn't be required to move from 1A to 2 or 3A to accommodate a few private school kids.Have a feeling that this impacts smaller schools more than larger ones.