Yep, you are correct. There is NO correlation between the recruiting level and the amount of wins PSU has. I mean, the top 10 recruits for PSU(Taylor, Ruth, Wright, Retherford, Nickal, RBY, Lee, Starocci and Brooks) don't go undefeated multiple seasons and run away as prohibitive favorites. That simply CAN NOT have anything to do with why they win at a much higher rate. I mean I did a stat earlier where the average Iowa recruit for last season was 30.XX and the PSU recruit was 5.XX, but why would that matter....
Meanwhile, Iowa has had plenty of 30ish or so ranked kids that are "produced" to be "capable" of winning it. But, they fall SOOO far short by having their highest ranked recruits go 1st,1st,1st,6th or 3rd, 4th, 2nd, 4th or 7th,4th,2nd,5th.
Again, the fact that PSU has more top 10 recruits on this season's roster than Iowa has had under Brands CAN NOT have anything to do with it either...
Mind you, I STILL said PSU would almost certainly have produced more Champs if both Iowa and PSU had the same number of high end recruits. However, you are a COMPLETE MORON if you do not think Iowa's Individual Titles would be considerably higher with the same level of recruits over that same timeframe...