What's easier to launch a cyber attack against our government or just stroll across the border.
Thanks Obama your pathetic.
Thanks Obama your pathetic.
Another cyber attack = Thanks Obama
- Thread starter Arbitr8
- Start date
Well, let's not let facts get in the way of today's faux rant of the day for Habah/Arbitr8.
Some agencies didn't get hit because their personnel records are on paper. Maybe the government should be funded even less.
This sounds like the Battlestar Galactica plan, but I'm not sure it would really save money.
Wake up! They are coming across the border scurrying around like rats at a grain elevator.
In the minute it took to type this, about 2 dozen just swam across the Rio Grande, they are still dripping wet.
Maybe we should get rid of the internet with the exception of HROT and pron.
And once again the right can't help themselves and compares immigrants to vermin. No wonder you guys got your asses handed to you in 2012.
Typical liberal wacko response legitimize them by using the term immigrants rather than call them out for what they are "criminals".
Only in the Republican world is someone trying to make a better life for themselves a criminal, which is pretty much the point behind immigration reform. But fair enough, you think people from South of the border are rats. Most of your fellow leaders would agree. What minority groups don't you guys compare to animals?
Once again one of the triplets (Huey, Dewey and Louie) fails to admit that illegal aliens are criminals.
We need to round up Jose, little papino, and grandma ma and send them packing back across the Pecos.
Come on. You guys were calling children escaping extreme poverty and violence "Criminals." Children, for chrissake. 7 and 8 years olds were risking their lives to flee from gang rapes and murders and the Republican response was to protest the kids! It's unbelievable. This has nothing to do with the law and everything to do with the uneasiness the right has with anyone not white. Every last minority group votes against you. Hispanics vote against you. Blacks vote against you. Asians vote against you. Gay people vote against you. Even women vote against you. And there's a reason for that. Your side wants to push everyone but rich white men to the margins.
Marketing. We all know Rs are better at marketing their simpler bumper sticker positions.
I'll bet you could find some sportsmen in Texas who would be happy to ping them off while crossing the Rio Grande.
"Easier than shooting rabbits, you won't even need a full magazine. Of course, you can't eat 'em or take 'em to the taxi-dermist. Still fun though, and you are defending the USA."
As in bomb China? Maybe we offer an X Prize of say $10 million to who ever can harm China the most? Unleash the basement hacker crowd on that tyrant kingdom. Bring down the great firewall. Stream lesbian midget porn into Tiananmen Square.
Perhaps we should put more of the effort we devote to snooping on Americans into defending Americans.
I think you could argue they inflicted enough damage to name them the winner. The Starbuck Angel storyline still tarnished the ending for me.
Yes! Why wasn't that in the Freedom Act? Turn all our NSA survalence of Americans into collecting the rest of the world's emails. Mine it, then sell industrial secrets to American companies to fund it all. Are you reading this NSA? I want a royalty, a small one so the risk calculations don't favor killing me.
The final season certainly lost some coherence. Up till then, the best SF ever.
Prior to that, the best SF ever was probably the less-well-known Babylon 5. Which also sort of petered out in the final season.
I mention Babylon 5 in part because I just saw a blurb about a new show from the Babylon 5 folks. I forget everything else, but that guy (J Michael Straczynski) is a terrific story-teller. So my hopes are up. Ah, a quick check on IMDb says it's called Sense8. Apparently it's on Netflix.
BTW, that's not to knock any of the Treks. Love them all. But B5, like BG, had a coherent overarching story arc that really carried you along.
