93 ethanol or ethanol free? Just curious - there is only one correct answer btw.
I saw something recently on YT that because of pricing, 91 to 93 tends to sit in stations' tanks a LOT longer. Therefore it also can be more susceptible to in effect turning into "deck stain"...clogging all the little things that go into a vehicle's fuel system because simply put it got old (or old gas was put in by their wholesaler).
Fuel issues from the station are quite rare - the video (a YT'er that bought his 91 non-ethanol from a BP in Marshalltown IA) was amazed that it happened because he had never never seen an actual case of bad gas "from the pump" ever in his life.
I had it happen in the late 2000's from my now closed local Casey's...never, ever bought 91 octane from them again - never had a fuel quality issue since.
Yet, he was able to remove the gas he bought and it indeed looked like deck stain. He then went to a different station/brand, bought the same 91 non-ethanol - and not only was the color much (normal) clearer, the engine in his car after a short time began running back to normal.
Now, I see a couple posts in response beat me to my next question. I know of not a single vehicle that REQUIRES 93 octane. 91 is usually the highest I've seen required. Certain engines also require a certain level of ethanol to NOT be put in the tank (usually 10%...don't go higher if it says not to).
And I can see (not saying this is what you did) say for example if you put in 93 ethanol...check the mix ratio ethanol to pure gasoline. What might have happened is that 93 octane may be mixed with juuuuuuuuuuuust a bit too much ethanol and your engine specs dictate you don't cross that line - which may be why your brand new engine may be choking and puking a bit.
Use exactly what the manufacturer states to use. And IMHO...if you can, don't use ethanol. And if you have no choice but to use ethanol, make damn sure the mix is at or below what the owner's manual states to use.