Now that the court ruled the president has immunity from everything and can even have those he disagrees with eliminated by Seal team Six, Biden should immediately begin using that and get Thomas and Alito off the court since they are crooked.
Biden set to announce support for major Supreme Court changes
- Thread starter cigaretteman
- Start date
Every post you make proves you are an expert in ignorance and stupidity.
The potential changes come in response to growing outrage among his supporters about recent ethics scandals surrounding Justice Clarence Thomas and decisions by the new court majority that have changed legal precedent on issues including abortion and federal regulatory powers.
That's fairly pathetic. Change the rules because it's not going your way?
I agree with a code of ethics and limiting terms. As good moves going forward for all.
That's fairly pathetic. Change the rules because it's not going your way?
I agree with a code of ethics and limiting terms. As good moves going forward for all.
Isn't this the sort of reason we'd tear into republicans for?
Things aren't going your way... time to change the rules.
Time for lots of things in government to change for the good of the country.
Age limits for all three branches…term limits…
You in?
Oh - you mean an expert in recognizing it in others?
Can’t say I disagree.
Laughable response. The SCOTUS is proving itself incapable. of self regulation. The hubris of several justices is undeniable. This would be an issue no matter what. Common sense course correction is needed. Team Red won't do it because they are getting the wins they want.
In a non election year this would probably have bi-partisan support. People are fed up with justices taking $4 million dollars and lying that it doesn't affect their opinions.
Biden isn't advocating for anything. He is a Dementia patient being used by others to push ideology.
There is zero chance anything bidens handler wrote on this will go anywhere.
There is zero chance anything bidens handler wrote on this will go anywhere.
You are a fool
The Supreme Court doesn't answer to the president or congress. There is a process to hold a supreme court justoce accountable. Follow that process or stfu
So would Biden be pushing term limits if the Supreme Court was 9-0 Democrats?
Yes, that is the most likely path.
There is a HR that some claim they could be given a different title and replaced after 18 years.
Congress determines the size of the Supreme Court
Probably not, voter pandering due to decisions not liked. Both sides really don't like the Supreme Court when decisions go against them
No, it was about the political gamesmanship that McConnell pulled. It was absolutely atrocious what he did. If that didn't happen I would be upset with current court rulings but accept them. Same way I am when I president I don't want gets into office.
I personally think the Supreme court should have 1 member representing each of the 12 federal districts. A final 13th member is appointed by the President with a required up/down vote in the first month by the Senate. When the President's term is expired, that court member is removed.
I don't necessarily want term limits. I do want age limits. No one past 70. Roberts is 69, Thomas is 76, Alito is 74, and Sotomeyer is 70. Time to go.
I don't necessarily want term limits. I do want age limits. No one past 70. Roberts is 69, Thomas is 76, Alito is 74, and Sotomeyer is 70. Time to go.
There should be term limits for the Supreme Court We shouldn’t be stuck with lunatics for a lifetime
There hasn't been a Democrat majority on the court since 1986 despite them only losing the popular vote twice in that time and one of those times was after Bush Jr lost the popular vote the first time but won the electoral college. That is ridiculous to me and should be ridiculous to you as well.
And I think dems should do whatever they can to unpack the court as that is what has happened. If it wasn't for the rat****ing McConnell pulled I would have a lot less to say about the Supreme Court.
Involving a book publisher??????I think you’re forgetting a couple people…
2 Supreme Court justices did not recuse themselves in cases involving their book publisher | CNN Politics
Two Supreme Court justices did not recuse themselves from cases that came before the court over the past decade involving a publishing company that’s paid them in lucrative book deals.amp.cnn.com
Very serious charges here!!!!!!!
Link?
LOLOLOLOLOL
Maybe it's time we looked into some RV charges?
You can't be serious!
smh&jfc!
I think we've granted too much executive and legislative power to the Supreme Court. The scope of their rulings on Court cases should be limited to those cases and future cases should be decided on their own merit, not what a partisan panel decided in some cases decades prior. Times change, society changes, views evolve...But we are supposed to honor a ruling from 1880 because of stare decisis?
I'd like to see the Supreme Court get out if taking cases and simply decide if federal laws are constitutional.
They wouldn't have much to do, but that's okay, the only power they would wield is to decide if things like an individual mandate for health insurance is legal.
There would still be each state's supreme court for deciding cases based in their state's constitution.
I'd like to see the Supreme Court get out if taking cases and simply decide if federal laws are constitutional.
They wouldn't have much to do, but that's okay, the only power they would wield is to decide if things like an individual mandate for health insurance is legal.
There would still be each state's supreme court for deciding cases based in their state's constitution.
You asked for a link.
So...from the link.
CNN —
Two Supreme Court justices did not recuse themselves from cases that came before the court over the past decade involving a publishing company that’s paid them in lucrative book deals.
In two separate copyright infringement cases concerning the publishing conglomerate Penguin Random House, the high court declined to take up the appeals, with the court saying in 2013 that it wouldn’t hear the first case, and the second case being turned away from the court in 2019 and again in 2020. In both cases, the publisher won at the lower court level, and those decisions stood.
Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances.
You ok with that?
Last edited:
They're granted the power we give to them, and 9 un-elected people shouldn't be deciding the things they do for 330 Million.
Absolutely. Should not have senators and HoR staying for decades. Let's go.
Similar threads
