ADVERTISEMENT

Bubble Watch Rooting Interests 3/7/17

Can somebody please tell Lunardi, Palm, etc. that Syracuse doesn't get to play in the Carrier Dome in the Dance?? Their RPI is actually 80 (ESPN's is slightly off from the official that you can get at NCAA site or CBS Sports. They've lost at home to St. John's and their best road or neutral win is Clemson. GIVE. ME. A. BREAK. Also, Boeheim is possibly even more of a Bastard than Steve Alford, if that's possible. If we're left out and they're in I'll be FURIOUS. Especially if they lose tomorrow and they still get it in and we beat Indiana.

The committee better see this!

I posted what follows in my Lunardi thread.

There are 19 Bubble teams we need to lose ASAP. Illinois State has already lost in their conference final to Wichita State.

What follows is a really good up to date summary by conference of the 19 teams not named "Iowa" that are on the bubble. Ideally, each of these 19 teams that are still alive in their conference tourneys gets blown out early.

It goes without saying but obviously we don't want some surprise team winning their Power 5 conference tournament.


College Basketball Bubble Watch

Updated: March 7, 2017, 8:53 AM ET
By Eamonn Brennan | ESPN.com
Entire analysis is here: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/bubblewatch


Here is where Iowa is right now: Iowa [18-13 (10-8), RPI: 69, SOS: 46]

The 19 other Bubble Teams:

From American Athletic Conf

Houston [21-9 (12-6), RPI: 50, SOS: 66] .


From Atlantic 10:

Rhode Island [21-9 (13-5), RPI: 42, SOS: 55]


From ACC:

Syracuse [18-13 (10-8), RPI: 77, SOS: 61]

Wake Forest [18-12 (9-9), RPI: 28, SOS: 13]

Georgia Tech [17-14 (8-10), RPI: 95, SOS: 59]


From Big 12:

Kansas State [19-12 (8-10), RPI: 58, SOS: 54]


From Big East:

Seton Hall [20-10 (10-8), RPI: 43, SOS: 58]

Providence [20-11 (10-8), RPI: 52, SOS: 50]

Marquette [19-11 (10-8), RPI: 56, SOS: 57]

Xavier [19-12 (9-9), RPI: 32, SOS: 12]


From Big 10:

Michigan State [18-13 (10-8), RPI: 47, SOS: 9]

Illinois [18-13 (8-10), RPI: 57, SOS: 20]


From Mountain West:

Nevada [25-6 (14-4), RPI: 34, SOS: 149]


From PAC 12:


USC [23-8 (10-8), RPI: 38, SOS: 77]

California [19-11 (10-8), RPI: 55, SOS: 36]


From SEC:

Vanderbilt [17-14 (10-8), RPI: 44, SOS: 3] .


Others

Illinois State [27-6 (17-1), RPI: 36, SOS: 155]

Middle Tennessee [27-4 (17-1), RPI: 39, SOS: 160]

UT Arlington [24-7 (14-4), RPI: 40, SOS: 147]
 
Listening to a couple of podcasts. It sounds like everyone is throwing stuff at the wall and seeing if it sticks. This committee could go completely against all odds and awards bids to mid majors this year? It seems like it changes every year.

The one thing they all agreed on was the top 50 wins. They value the non-conf SOS, but also if you beat the top 50 or 100.

So I don't know, I am shifting more towards we need 2 in DC. I was originally thinking 1 maybe would do it, but now its sounding more like 2 might be needed.
 
I don't understand GT KSU or IL. If you can't even win half your conf games, you should be happy to play in the nit!
KSU and IL make SOME sense. Committee is still supposedly looking only at RPI for a ranking system this year this yea---and top 50 RPI wins, particularly on the road or neutral sites, have in previous years been given weight.

Therefore, I think one can make a strong case that Iowa should be in if we beat Indiana---especially if just 1-2 out of Cuse, KSU, Rhode Island, Xavier loses. I think we should be AHEAD of Illinois State and Cuse already----and if MI beats IL---then also IL
 
I could be wrong but I doubt they're behind us. Yeah not many top 50 wins but they have a terrific RPI and SOS and no sub 100 losses.
Wake should be in. If we beat Indiana, the teams we are trying to nudge out are more like Illinois State, Illinois, Syracuse, USC, Kansas State, Rhode Island, I believe. I think most people who have Illinois State still in are just waiting for a team like Iowa to win in their conference tournament, then switch places.
 
Last edited:
Bracket matrix now showing us as 3rd team out (behind Rhode Island and K-State). I love being in a "March Situation"
 
A win over IU leaves it in the hands of the committee and a bunch of bubble results. I think two wins makes it almost certain that the Hawks dance. I am also a homer, but the whole season counts. Since the committee officially no longer considers the last 10 games, the only good argument for downplaying Iowa's early results is that Cook missed much of the pre-B1G. The Hawks were NOT a good team for the first third of the season.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT