ADVERTISEMENT

California Lawmakers to Propose $25 Million Fund to Litigate Trump Administration

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,813
61,255
113
California lawmakers will convene a special session on Monday to discuss legislation to bolster the state against potential attacks by Donald J. Trump’s administration, including a proposed fund of up to $25 million to underwrite litigation against the federal government, Gov. Gavin Newsom said.
President-elect Trump and fellow Republicans signaled during the campaign that he would target signature California policies if he were to win the election, including environmental protections, safeguards for immigrants, civil rights laws and abortion access. Democratic governors across the country have expressed concerns that the second Trump administration will be better prepared and less restrained.
California’s Democratic leaders, who have been working for more than a year on contingency plans in the event of a second Trump term, announced within days of the election that they would begin to meet early this month on plans to “Trump-proof” the nation’s most populous state.
“We will work with the incoming administration and we want President Trump to succeed in serving all Americans,” Governor Newsom said in a statement on Monday. “But when there is overreach, when lives are threatened, when rights and freedoms are targeted, we will take action.”
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


The fund for litigation aims to pay for legal resources in the state’s Justice Department and regulatory agencies to “challenge illegal federal actions in court and take administrative actions to reduce potential harm,” according to the governor’s office.
The proposed $25 million figure is significantly less than the roughly $42 million that California spent on lawsuits against the federal government during the first Trump administration, when the state sued the government more than 120 times. The smaller number — a fraction of the state’s nearly $300 billion annual budget — is a testament to concern over the risk of a financial shortfall. California’s lawmakers struggled to close a deficit this year.
The figure is also a nod to the number of fronts on which the state’s Democrats expect the Trump administration to attack California. Mr. Newsom has already vowed to provide rebates to eligible residents who buy electric vehicles if Mr. Trump ends the $7,500 federal E.V. tax credit. The governor also has floated a possible disaster assistance fund to cover victims of floods and wildfires should Mr. Trump withhold federal aid from the disaster-prone state.
California also extends health insurance coverage under the state’s version of Medicaid to low-income residents regardless of immigration status, a program that the next administration has also targeted.
But the fund’s size also reflects the state’s success during and after Mr. Trump’s first term in protecting Californians against efforts to weaken state regulations, and the likelihood that Democratic states will work together to challenge Mr. Trump.

 
The proposed $25 million figure is significantly less than the roughly $42 million that California spent on lawsuits against the federal government during the first Trump administration, when the state sued the government more than 120 times. The smaller number — a fraction of the state’s nearly $300 billion annual budget

That's 0.008333% of the annual budget.
 
They are going to need a lot more than that. Unless that fund is just to give the under the table checks to the Supreme Court Justices to get them to vote a certain way since that seems to be how 6 of them operate.
 
They are going to need a lot more than that. Unless that fund is just to give the under the table checks to the Supreme Court Justices to get them to vote a certain way since that seems to be how 6 of them operate.
What a ridiculous assertion.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kelsers
So is two Supreme Court justices getting millions worth of personal favors from people and then ruling on cases that directly affect those people or ruling on cases that directly affect the spouse of a Justice but here we are.
Keep trying. I can smell the 💩💩💩 from here.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Kelsers and ICHerky
Keep trying. I can smell the 💩💩💩 from here.
You probably should flush your toilet then. I'm not making these things up. You can live in denial all you want, but these are verified facts that they haven't even denied.

 
States need to protect their rights under 9A and 10A. That being said, states also need to abide by laws based on federal enumerated rights such as protection of the border, immigration, and (as expanded) interstate commerce. This should be done on a case by case basis. If California, or Trump, go all in based on politics instead of law, that will be a mistake.
 
You probably should flush your toilet then. I'm not making these things up. You can live in denial all you want, but these are verified facts that they haven't even denied.

Republicans don't like to know things. Then when they know something, they simply ignore it and pretend their first belief is still the correct one.
 
Nobiggie. states do this all the time.

that said, i'll assume the ag will dispurse teh money to favored outside counsel, and in this kind of litigation, $25m ain't going to go very far.
 
How easily you just dismiss the millions of dollars in favors done for a couple Republican members of the SC. Please tell me you don't think that was all on the up and up. No quid pro quo there? Don't be naive, please.
I’ll cut back on the naïveté if you’ll work harder on not being so unintelligent.
Deal?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kelsers
California lawmakers will convene a special session on Monday to discuss legislation to bolster the state against potential attacks by Donald J. Trump’s administration, including a proposed fund of up to $25 million to underwrite litigation against the federal government, Gov. Gavin Newsom said.
President-elect Trump and fellow Republicans signaled during the campaign that he would target signature California policies if he were to win the election, including environmental protections, safeguards for immigrants, civil rights laws and abortion access. Democratic governors across the country have expressed concerns that the second Trump administration will be better prepared and less restrained.
California’s Democratic leaders, who have been working for more than a year on contingency plans in the event of a second Trump term, announced within days of the election that they would begin to meet early this month on plans to “Trump-proof” the nation’s most populous state.
“We will work with the incoming administration and we want President Trump to succeed in serving all Americans,” Governor Newsom said in a statement on Monday. “But when there is overreach, when lives are threatened, when rights and freedoms are targeted, we will take action.”
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


The fund for litigation aims to pay for legal resources in the state’s Justice Department and regulatory agencies to “challenge illegal federal actions in court and take administrative actions to reduce potential harm,” according to the governor’s office.
The proposed $25 million figure is significantly less than the roughly $42 million that California spent on lawsuits against the federal government during the first Trump administration, when the state sued the government more than 120 times. The smaller number — a fraction of the state’s nearly $300 billion annual budget — is a testament to concern over the risk of a financial shortfall. California’s lawmakers struggled to close a deficit this year.
The figure is also a nod to the number of fronts on which the state’s Democrats expect the Trump administration to attack California. Mr. Newsom has already vowed to provide rebates to eligible residents who buy electric vehicles if Mr. Trump ends the $7,500 federal E.V. tax credit. The governor also has floated a possible disaster assistance fund to cover victims of floods and wildfires should Mr. Trump withhold federal aid from the disaster-prone state.
California also extends health insurance coverage under the state’s version of Medicaid to low-income residents regardless of immigration status, a program that the next administration has also targeted.
But the fund’s size also reflects the state’s success during and after Mr. Trump’s first term in protecting Californians against efforts to weaken state regulations, and the likelihood that Democratic states will work together to challenge Mr. Trump.

Insanity.....and they still can't figure out why they lost bigly.....
 
Not surprised by the level of expert feces knowledge you have. Another sign of being jealous that you can't afford to live here.
O...M...G..... 3/4 the "residents" of the shithole state of CA, are ILLEGALS and zombie street people. It must be soooooooo difficult to afford to live there in the welfare state!! lol
 
Texas has sued the Biden administration 101 times and counting.

So let’s save the outrage.
Not only that...Arkansas of all places is way up on the list.

Which is why, fundamentally, you should never trust an elected state AG with higher office, whether their name is Kamala, Richard, Ken, Tim, Josh, Jason, or otherwise.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
Dems needed $1,000,000,000 to lose the election,.. $25,000,000 should be enough to lose a few court cases...
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT