Trans-polarRoy are you bi-polar by any chance?....
Trans-polarRoy are you bi-polar by any chance?....
Good first post Johnny.Iowa would be manhandled by any one of those teams. Stick to UNI
That's just as bad but for different reasons....Trans-polar
Sounds like Barta let Pollard call the shots. If that's the case Barta should have put on his big boy pants.Buck - we had that chance and Pollard would not let us out for 2 years. He threatened litigation if we tried to get out for 2 years so ND went to Wisconsin. The ND-Iowa deal was for 2 years at Soldiers Field. Both night games. 1 year they are home team on NBC the other year we are home on ABC. Pollard said no and Barta didn't want to give up another home game nor deal with the political fall out of litigation with ISU. So we lost out on ND thanks to Pollard. ISU needs Iowa. They are irrelevant as it is but even more so without us. And they can't get another home and home with a P5. Their last one was in the 90's with Minnesota. That's why they do home and homes with Akron while before the 9 game conference schedule Iowa had ASU, Arizona, Pitt, Syracuse and Missouri (until Missouri chickened out). No P5 teams wants what we already know. ISU is a lose lose. Win and you are supposed to and drop in the rankings, lose and you are a joke. Just pathetic.
BS...It would have come out in the press. ND wouldn`t spit at Iowa. Texas had to work their tail off to get a home/home with ND.....your schtick is quite comical and delusional if you believe it.
Buck - we had that chance and Pollard would not let us out for 2 years. He threatened litigation if we tried to get out for 2 years so ND went to Wisconsin. The ND-Iowa deal was for 2 years at Soldiers Field. Both night games. 1 year they are home team on NBC the other year we are home on ABC. Pollard said no and Barta didn't want to give up another home game nor deal with the political fall out of litigation with ISU. So we lost out on ND thanks to Pollard. ISU needs Iowa. They are irrelevant as it is but even more so without us. And they can't get another home and home with a P5. Their last one was in the 90's with Minnesota. That's why they do home and homes with Akron while before the 9 game conference schedule Iowa had ASU, Arizona, Pitt, Syracuse and Missouri (until Missouri chickened out). No P5 teams wants what we already know. ISU is a lose lose. Win and you are supposed to and drop in the rankings, lose and you are a joke. Just pathetic.
the claim was home & home....neutral site games are a different story.
Unless it’s Iowa State. They don’t get any of either. Yet, here you are with an opinion.
KF and the Hawks have not exactly owned the Cyclones during his tenure. So not to consider them a respectable opponent may be somewhat off base. And don’t comeback with it is their Bowl Game B.S.Nothing gained by playing ISU. No one cares if you beat them. You get laughed at if you lose. Home/home with Texas A&M, Florida or LSU would be much more preferred!
Yeah, I'd imagine 90% of the people whining about it don't spend much time in iowa and/or dealing with isu fansIt would also be a lose if we managed to drop those parasites. We’d hear every year about how we dropped them because we we scared and how they’d beat us it we played.