ADVERTISEMENT

CFP Selection Show

I think they got the field right which is relieving to see. They had to give byes based on the conference champ requirements but they need to fix that requirement asap. Boise blindly getting a bye over a power 4 runner up is a travesty.
Personally I love it. Conference realignment and poor CFP rankings did this, not ASU and Boises "weak schedule."
 
Why isn’t it just 16 ****ing teams. No byes. Just seed it, problem solved.
Trying to create controversy and conversation. It's a smart move but yeah, it's a far less effective scenario than a straight up tournament.
 
Less losses. Bama is better, but they lost when they shouldn’t have. I am not onboard with them jumping smu just because they’re better on paper. Don’t lose your ****ing games.
I'm fine with Alabama jumping someone bc of a better resume but why punish SMU for losing a ranked CCG when other teams sitting at home are safe and sound?
 
Saban just opened the door on the superconference idea. Talking about the separation between tiers He said maybe the top 30 teams should just play each other.
 
Not a troll, had ISU played ASU to the wire would they be in instead of SMU?
I could see that. And it would be a bad decision given their resume.
I get that the whole point in having guaranteed spots for second tier leagues is to keep a larger number of teams invested in the process. That's ok as long as they are seeded appropriately when the playoff starts. asu should most definitely not get a bye. Nor should boise st., although there's a better argument for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swagsurfer02
I'm ok with either one. However, I don't think anyone being honest with themselves thinks SMU is a better team than Alabama. If Alabama went to the ACC instead of SMU and had their schedule this season, they would probably be 13-0 and the #2 seed.

I feel for SMU, but it's pretty difficult making an argument about how good and deserving your team is when you just got upset by a team that doesn't belong in the CFP....
Alabama got destroyed by a weak Oklahoma team and lost to Vanderbilt. My adivce to 'Bama: Beat Vanderbilt OR Oklahoma, and join the party. You can't do that, you don't deserve . . . and did not receive . . . an invite. Simple as that.
 
Alabama got destroyed by a weak Oklahoma team and lost to Vanderbilt. My adivce to 'Bama: Beat Vanderbilt OR Oklahoma, and join the party. You can't do that, you don't deserve . . . and did not receive . . . an invite. Simple as that.
Saban did say one thing that's indisputable. Every team controls their own destiny. Just win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris
lFTWtQu.jpg



Hawks are getting Bama…….Book it
I think Illinois gets bama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rambler Hawk
Don’t lose to the worst Oklahoma team in decades and Vanderbilt.
He's not only talking about Alabama. He's talking about all major conference teams. I personally put more weight in losing close to an SEC/B1G team than winning against an ACC/B12 opponent. I know a lot will disagree with that but the disparity really is that great and will only widen over the coming years. Actually, it'll widen so much over the next five years it won't even be a question. Ah, the power of money in a purely money driven sport.
 
Was SMU’s SOS and SOR better than ISU’s?
At this point I don't think it matters. Where they have them ranked relative to each other, I just don't see ISU ever making that sort of jump from 16 to 12 over Alabama, Miami, South Carolina, Ole Miss, and SMU after losing a close game to the 15th overall seed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swagsurfer02
I think that this has to be a serious consideration at least going forward rather than hopeful speculation as it used to be. No sense since ISU is a decent opponent now. Schedule the Maine Black Bears of the world going forward. They'll love the money and the ass kicking.
Poor Nicky. Gotta play Mercer more often. Forget about those nasty fellas from Oklahoma and Vanderbilt. How could Alabama be expected to beat big boys like that? LOL
 
I'm no 'bama fan, but I do agree with the argument that strength of schedule should matter. More so than being runner up in a second tier league with a couple of decent wins.
I have less issue with that, though, than the byes. That needs fixed.

He's not only talking about Alabama. He's talking about all major conference teams. I personally put more weight in losing close to an SEC/B1G team than winning against an ACC/B12 opponent. I know a lot will disagree with that but the disparity really is that great and will only widen over the coming years. Actually, it'll widen so much over the next five years it won't even be a question. Ah, the power of money in a purely money driven sport.
So beating Kentucky should count as two wins while losing to Kentucky should count as a win?
 
And it never should have been allowed to happen. Incestuous bulkshit collusion so ESPN can dictate terms and make money.

Well everytime another conference lined up against the SEC in championships they got the brakes beat off them except for last year, ‘14 when OSU won, and the FSU Jameis team over Auburn.
 
I'm no 'bama fan, but I do agree with the argument that strength of schedule should matter. More so than being runner up in a second tier league with a couple of decent wins.
I have less issue with that, though, than the byes. That needs fixed.
But here's the thing: Alabama and Ohio State and Oregon and Texas and the other "blue bloods" have ALL the money and ALL the advantages in the world. SMU and ASU and Boise and others lack most of those advantages. So the blue bloods should be playing more tough teams and, if they're worthy, they should beat them. And besides, SOS is highly subjective. There's already a built-in SEC bias. If you want to be in the CFP, stop whining and start winning . . . unless the likes of Vanderbilt and Oklahoma are too much for the poor fellas at Alabama to handle. Bring on Mercer! LOL
 
But here's the thing: Alabama and Ohio State and Oregon and Texas and the other "blue bloods" have ALL the money and ALL the advantages in the world. SMU and ASU and Boise and others lack most of those advantages. So the blue bloods should be playing more tough teams and, if they're worthy, they should beat them. And besides, SOS is highly subjective. There's already a built-in SEC bias. If you want to be in the CFP, stop whining and start winning . . . unless the likes of Vanderbilt and Oklahoma are too much for the poor fellas at Alabama to handle. Bring on Mercer! LOL
If winning the MW and B12 is so easy, maybe Alabama should go over there and do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garbanzo Joe
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT