Why isn’t it just 16 ****ing teams. No byes. Just seed it, problem solved.
Less losses. Bama is better, but they lost when they shouldn’t have. I am not onboard with them jumping smu just because they’re better on paper. Don’t lose your ****ing games.I don’t know if you’re suggesting that SMU is a better team than Bama or they just have less losses than Bama?
Personally I love it. Conference realignment and poor CFP rankings did this, not ASU and Boises "weak schedule."I think they got the field right which is relieving to see. They had to give byes based on the conference champ requirements but they need to fix that requirement asap. Boise blindly getting a bye over a power 4 runner up is a travesty.
Trying to create controversy and conversation. It's a smart move but yeah, it's a far less effective scenario than a straight up tournament.Why isn’t it just 16 ****ing teams. No byes. Just seed it, problem solved.
I'm fine with Alabama jumping someone bc of a better resume but why punish SMU for losing a ranked CCG when other teams sitting at home are safe and sound?Less losses. Bama is better, but they lost when they shouldn’t have. I am not onboard with them jumping smu just because they’re better on paper. Don’t lose your ****ing games.
I could see that. And it would be a bad decision given their resume.Not a troll, had ISU played ASU to the wire would they be in instead of SMU?
Nice try, boys, but amazingly, SMU beats out 'Bama! The first upset of the 12-team playoffs. And everyone outside of Alabama has to be thrilled. I am.Herbstreit and Saban really trying to prepare us that Alabama is going to get in over SMU.
Needs to be 16 like every other division.This demonstrates why there should be no byes. #9 and #12 get byes.
I don't see 16 seed ISU conference runner up to the 15 seed jumping 8 seed SMU conference runner up to the 17 seed just for losing by 3.Not a troll, had ISU played ASU to the wire would they be in instead of SMU?
Alabama got destroyed by a weak Oklahoma team and lost to Vanderbilt. My adivce to 'Bama: Beat Vanderbilt OR Oklahoma, and join the party. You can't do that, you don't deserve . . . and did not receive . . . an invite. Simple as that.I'm ok with either one. However, I don't think anyone being honest with themselves thinks SMU is a better team than Alabama. If Alabama went to the ACC instead of SMU and had their schedule this season, they would probably be 13-0 and the #2 seed.
I feel for SMU, but it's pretty difficult making an argument about how good and deserving your team is when you just got upset by a team that doesn't belong in the CFP....
Saban did say one thing that's indisputable. Every team controls their own destiny. Just win.Alabama got destroyed by a weak Oklahoma team and lost to Vanderbilt. My adivce to 'Bama: Beat Vanderbilt OR Oklahoma, and join the party. You can't do that, you don't deserve . . . and did not receive . . . an invite. Simple as that.
I can’t stand that hypocrite.Saban in tears practically saying you can’t schedule tough good games anymore if SoS doesn’t matter. Maybe don’t lose to vandy and a crap Oklahoma team turd.
I don't see 16 seed ISU conference runner up to the 15 seed jumping 8 seed SMU conference runner up to the 17 seed just for losing by 3.
I think Illinois gets bama.
Hawks are getting Bama…….Book it
That and their record.Was SMU’s SOS and SOR better than ISU’s?
He's not only talking about Alabama. He's talking about all major conference teams. I personally put more weight in losing close to an SEC/B1G team than winning against an ACC/B12 opponent. I know a lot will disagree with that but the disparity really is that great and will only widen over the coming years. Actually, it'll widen so much over the next five years it won't even be a question. Ah, the power of money in a purely money driven sport.Don’t lose to the worst Oklahoma team in decades and Vanderbilt.
That and their record.
Hey now 16 would have gotten Alabama in. We need to savor 12 .Why isn’t it just 16 ****ing teams. No byes. Just seed it, problem solved.
Citrus is highest bowl after playoffs for sec. Illini get bama.Boo this man!!!
At this point I don't think it matters. Where they have them ranked relative to each other, I just don't see ISU ever making that sort of jump from 16 to 12 over Alabama, Miami, South Carolina, Ole Miss, and SMU after losing a close game to the 15th overall seed.Was SMU’s SOS and SOR better than ISU’s?
Saban can **** off. The world doesn't revolve around the sec and ESPNSaban just opened the door on the superconference idea. Talking about the separation between tiers He said maybe the top 30 teams should just play each other.
If OSU wins, they'll have a rematch with Oregon and a chance to make up for that controversial one-point loss. OSU couldn't ask for a better opportunity. Let's see what they can do with it.Tennessee, tOSU, Oregon is a loaded bracket.
Saban can **** off. The world doesn't revolve around the sec and ESPN
And it never should have been allowed to happen. Incestuous bulkshit collusion so ESPN can dictate terms and make money.For the past 20 years……it pretty much has revolved around the SEC except for like 3 years.
Poor Nicky. Gotta play Mercer more often. Forget about those nasty fellas from Oklahoma and Vanderbilt. How could Alabama be expected to beat big boys like that? LOLI think that this has to be a serious consideration at least going forward rather than hopeful speculation as it used to be. No sense since ISU is a decent opponent now. Schedule the Maine Black Bears of the world going forward. They'll love the money and the ass kicking.
I'm no 'bama fan, but I do agree with the argument that strength of schedule should matter. More so than being runner up in a second tier league with a couple of decent wins.
I have less issue with that, though, than the byes. That needs fixed.
So beating Kentucky should count as two wins while losing to Kentucky should count as a win?He's not only talking about Alabama. He's talking about all major conference teams. I personally put more weight in losing close to an SEC/B1G team than winning against an ACC/B12 opponent. I know a lot will disagree with that but the disparity really is that great and will only widen over the coming years. Actually, it'll widen so much over the next five years it won't even be a question. Ah, the power of money in a purely money driven sport.
Well, Northern Illinois did, so yes, Indiana can win, and I sincerely hope the Cignetti boys can get 'er done.I actually think Indiana can beat Notre Dame
And it never should have been allowed to happen. Incestuous bulkshit collusion so ESPN can dictate terms and make money.
But here's the thing: Alabama and Ohio State and Oregon and Texas and the other "blue bloods" have ALL the money and ALL the advantages in the world. SMU and ASU and Boise and others lack most of those advantages. So the blue bloods should be playing more tough teams and, if they're worthy, they should beat them. And besides, SOS is highly subjective. There's already a built-in SEC bias. If you want to be in the CFP, stop whining and start winning . . . unless the likes of Vanderbilt and Oklahoma are too much for the poor fellas at Alabama to handle. Bring on Mercer! LOLI'm no 'bama fan, but I do agree with the argument that strength of schedule should matter. More so than being runner up in a second tier league with a couple of decent wins.
I have less issue with that, though, than the byes. That needs fixed.
If winning the MW and B12 is so easy, maybe Alabama should go over there and do it.But here's the thing: Alabama and Ohio State and Oregon and Texas and the other "blue bloods" have ALL the money and ALL the advantages in the world. SMU and ASU and Boise and others lack most of those advantages. So the blue bloods should be playing more tough teams and, if they're worthy, they should beat them. And besides, SOS is highly subjective. There's already a built-in SEC bias. If you want to be in the CFP, stop whining and start winning . . . unless the likes of Vanderbilt and Oklahoma are too much for the poor fellas at Alabama to handle. Bring on Mercer! LOL