This is my read:
- Vallas was just the default, stand in for the moderate/centrist Democrats, very far from a star. It's not like this is some totally unexpected upset of the establishment star.
- Most people commenting likely have only one major impression regarding this race: the approaches to crime
- Most people commenting likely don't know or care about the candidates positions on things like education, public transportation, taxes, etc.
- This race was framed around crime: Johnson was the defund the police guy, Vallas was the traditional hire more police, police union backing guy.
- There's a stigma and built in skepticism to: "defund police"
- It's my impression that Johnson has tried to walk back the "defund" stuff, but he's undoubtedly on the side of social services to address root cause of crime and Vallas was made his pro-police pitch clear as well.
- I have no problem accepting that addressing the root cause of crime is a worthy cause, I have no problem accepting that the current policing system/environment needs changing, it's not hard to believe that these concepts could work.
- I do have concerns for how it will actually play out in this city. I imagine they take time to implement and see results, costs money, requires strong leadership and cooperation. Not hard to imagine lots and lots of roadblocks and unintended consequences.
- Vallas's approach seemed like a less risky and more familiar approach, which is easy to lean towards if you're closer to a "have" than "have not".
- I didn't pay that close attention to this race and who knows what Johnson will actually be like in office.