That’s the part I don’t understand. It’s like if I named my organization Jim Crow and years later realized that was racist. I don’t understand how they couldn’t know so I don’t really believe there was no malicious internet. I think it’s more likely they knew what they were doing and are now saying they were ignorant as a cover.
I don't know about that. Convince me. I know of the notion of the Antebellum south, but, aside from saying it was a long time ago, and the south... have no real knowledge of what that means.
Could I infer that there were real problems with racism in that region and time period? Sure.
But do I know that "Antebellum" is speaking to something race specific? No.
Is it?
And then... are we to believe that any time a reference to that place and period is spoken or written that it's ought to be viewed as problematic unless the attendant "was racist" asterisk is attached?
Is that the standard by which we must abide now? Is that reasonable?