Why do parental wishes matter about this medical decision, but not when the choice is about gender affirmation decisions?
And vice versa?Why do parental wishes matter about this medical decision, but not when the choice is about gender affirmation decisions?
When I was a teenager, I needed absolutely zero further motivation to bone. Neither a lack of rubbers nor a moat filled with rabid crocodiles would have stopped me. Raging hormonal sex drives are going to win, might as well encourage safe practices.Partially, but that may encourage teens to bone because they think they're safe.
The only 100% safe sex is abstinence.
Just saying.
The DNC literally had abortion trailers outside of their convention. Shut the fvck up.You are truly sick, and clearly not educated on pregnancy and women.
Disgusting.
Yes. You triggered a lack of sorrow to see you leave. Sorry I couldn’t better conform my response to your semi literacy.Sorry. I must have triggered something in you based on that comment.
But the fact is, they have the world wide web in Canada too, so NoStemsnoSTICKS won't be leaving the internet.
Sorry to hear about your feral youth. Hopefully you were placed in good foster care at some point.When I was a teenager, I needed absolutely zero further motivation to bone. Neither a lack of rubbers nor a moat filled with rabid crocodiles would have stopped me. Raging hormonal sex drives are going to win, might as well encourage safe practices.
No gender affirmations decisions are happening outside of parental wishes. In states where abortion is legal, do you think parents should be able to force a minor to have one if the minor doesn't want to abort the fetus?And vice versa?
Give it time. Baby steps, so to speak. The goal is state control of the uterus of any woman of child bearing age. Your gang is playing the long game here.interesting.. so this is really sort of a variation on parental consent themes. Surprising out of the 9th circuit, and will be interesting to see if this gets en banc review. FWIW, i think it's a VERY different case from prohibiting an adult, or for that matter, a minor driving herself across the border, to get an abortion.
It's ok. I have really low expectations as it relates to maga and literacy.Yes. You triggered a lack of sorrow to see you leave. Sorry I couldn’t better conform my response to your semi literacy.
That one probably sounded better when it was still inside your head. Poor little man.It's ok. I have really low expectations as it relates to maga and literacy.
The only 100% safe sex is abstinence.
You're such a mediocre troll with your BS. This is just one example.
Well...I made a true statement.
Birth control fails sometimes.
Just ask OP's Mom.
Yawn. It was better when you killed hookers. This is just mediocre shit along with your vaccine and religion posts to try to get a rise out of people. You're the 2nd worst kind of attention whore just missing out on @Whiskeydeltadeltatango
No. So you're admitting that the situations are different. What was the point of your original statement conflating the two?No gender affirmations decisions are happening outside of parental wishes. In states where abortion is legal, do you think parents should be able to force a minor to have one if the minor doesn't want to abort the fetus?
So wrong. Ask Jesus mother Mary.Partially, but that may encourage teens to bone because they think they're safe.
The only 100% safe sex is abstinence.
Just saying.
My posts in this thread, vaccines and religion are completely serious. I don't troll.
I stopped debating posters almost entirely in 2022 after reading this article.
Arguing Is Pointless
It was lunchtime and the seven of us — two kids and five adults — would be in the car for the next three hours as we drove from New York City to upstate Connecticut for the weekend. We decided to get some takeout at a place on the corner of 88th and Broadway. I […]hbr.org
Well then you haven't encountered a pregnant 13 year old raped by her uncle or a 15 year old nearly beaten to death by her drunk, abusive father.This only involves minors correct?
All I know is that I feel parents should be informed if a minor wants to have an abortion.
If it were YOUR daughter, wouldn't you want to know??????????????
If not, you are a terrible parent.
No, the 2nd is a crime now that the dumb, Jesus freaks have taken over and made laws about it.The 1st situation you list includes multiple crimes.
The 2nd situation isn't a crime at all.
So it's not really a great comparison. I get what you're trying to say though.
The situations are different, but both are about parental rights. Idaho criminalizes a minor leaving the state for an abortion without parental consent, but also has a law banning gender affirming care for minors even with parental consent. Both are laws are supposedly protecting children, but the reality is they are about imposing an version of what some believe are "Christian" values.No. So you're admitting that the situations are different. What was the point of your original statement conflating the two?
"These choices should be made jointly by parents, minors and doctors"The situations are different, but both are about parental rights. Idaho criminalizes a minor leaving the state for an abortion without parental consent, but also has a law banning gender affirming care for minors even with parental consent. Both are laws are supposedly protecting children, but the reality is they are about imposing an version of what some believe are "Christian" values.
You don't like the idea of a parent forcing a minor to abort a fetus, but you are totally on board with a parent forcing a minor to carry the fetus to term. These choices should be made jointly by parents, minors, and doctors. The state should have no role in these personal medical decisions.
In most cases, I think parents should have a voice in a minor's decision to abort a fetus. So do you agree that the law against minors receiving gender affirming care even with parental consent is wrong?"These choices should be made jointly by parents, minors and doctors"
That's what this thread is about. The law stops minors from getting abortions without parental consent or even knowledge of the event. Glad you agree with it.
No, not really. I don't have strong feelings but I think permanent changes should not be done to minors even with parental consent.In most cases, I think parents should have a voice in a minor's decision to abort a fetus. So do you agree that the law against minors receiving gender affirming care even with parental consent is wrong?
I think your opinion is based on your moral beliefs rather than worry about permanent changes. Nothing could be a more permanently life changing than forcing a minor to give birth to an unwanted pregnancy.No, not really. I don't have strong feelings but I think permanent changes should not be done to minors even with parental consent.
To be fair though, I don't think minors should have abortions even with parental consent either unless it's rape, incest or the life of the mother is in danger.
Ending innocent human life is just as permanent.I think your opinion is based on your moral beliefs rather than worry about permanent changes. Nothing could be a more permanently life changing than forcing a minor to give birth to an unwanted pregnancy.
This doesn't exactly feel like freedom. Are there going to be checkpoints on state lines now like they had in Eastern Bloc countries?You're free as long as you agree with me.
Always clumps of cells over an actual human being with you.Ending innocent human life is just as permanent.
DerpAlways clumps of cells over an actual human being with you.
It’s weird how you pretend to care about the teen or adult and how little you care about the start of a human life.Like you give a shit about life after birth.
I like how you state that you don't really have a strong feeling about something, then state an absolutist position. You've made your position on trans citizens of all ages quite clear.No, not really. I don't have strong feelings but I think permanent changes should not be done to minors even with parental consent.
This happens again and again and again doesn't it.What if the child/fetus in question is a product of incessant. Is there an exemption?
Sometimes parental consent is impossible. Lots of scumbags pimp out their daughters/step daughters. Or the child wives still happen in more remote areas.This happens again and again and again doesn't it.
Partially, but that may encourage teens to bone because they think they're safe.
The only 100% safe sex is abstinence.
Just saying.
Well then you haven't encountered a pregnant 13 year old raped by her uncle or a 15 year old nearly beaten to death by her drunk, abusive father.
On repeat. For sure.Sometimes parental consent is impossible. Lots of scumbags pimp out their daughters/step daughters. Or the child wives still happen in more remote areas.
Hard to argue with reality, patriot.That one probably sounded better when it was still inside your head. Poor little man.
My point is that it's not something I'm going to go scream from the mountain tops like I might for other things. I have an opinion on it but I don't feel strongly enough to sit and argue about it.I like you you state that you don't really have a strong feeling about something, then state an absolutist position. You've made your position on trans citizens of all ages quite clear.
And as usual, reality is on my side. 🖕🏻Hard to argue with reality, patriot.
You think it is.And as usual, reality is on my side. 🖕🏻