ADVERTISEMENT

Crisis Actors: Was this Our 1st One?

Nat Algren

HB Legend
Nov 23, 2014
19,359
6,211
113
Or have there been others that I'm not aware? Click link for short video.

First ‘crisis actor’: 1990 ‘Nayirah’ claimed Iraq killed 312 hospital incubator infants in Kuwait to criminally incite war
Posted on December 17, 2015 by Carl Herman
2-minute clip from Barrie Zwicker’s The Great Conspiracy:


Edited and amended from a brief I wrote for interested Members of Congress in 2005 (and updated to 2009), War with Afghanistan and Iraq, rhetoric for war with Iran:

The US and Iraq: the history you didn’t know: Saddam Hussein was a vicious dictator who should have never ruled a nation. However, according to a dozen former US diplomats, US intelligence officials, and British scholars, Saddam was supported by the US beginning in 1959. The US CIA authorized Saddam to assassinate Iraq’s dictator, Abd al-Karim Qasim, who had recently withdrew from the pro-US Baghdad Pact and initiated friendly relations with the Soviet Union (49). The assassination failed, but another succeeded in 1963. Saddam rose in power, and became dictator in 1979. Saddam had US support to invade Iran in a War of Aggression from 1980 to 1988, including supplying him with biological and chemical weapons (50). When Saddam invaded Kuwait in August of 1990, US cooperation with him was suspended. The UN Security Council voted in favor of military action to remove Iraq from Kuwait.

US Congressional and public opinion to support any UN military force was divided. President George H.W. Bush spoke for US support of the war, emphasizing two areas of evidence:

  1. Testimony from a 15-year-old girl named Nayirah to Congress in October, 1990. Nayirah claimed to be a refugee and hospital volunteer of the maternity ward of Al Adan hospital in Kuwait City; stating she witnessed Iraqi soldiers steal the incubators and leave 312 infants to die on the cold hospital floor (51).
  2. US satellite photos showed Iraqi forces massing for attack on the Saudi Arabian border in September, 1990 with 250,000 troops and 1,500 tanks. The President and those who supported war spoke publicly of Iraqi cruelty and the need to protect the innocent people of Saudi Arabia.
Public opinion gradually shifted in favor for war. The Congressional vote passed by 52-47 in the Senate and 250-183 in the House on January 12, 1991 (52).

We now know both claims were known to be lies as they were told:

  1. Nayirah lied about her identity; she was the daughter of Kuwait Ambassador to the United States and member of the Kuwait royal family, Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah. Nayirah had no connection to the hospital and was coached on how to give her testimony by the US public relations firm Hill and Knowlton (53). The only explanation I can imagine that the Bush Senior administration was not lying about this evidence for war is if it never occurred to anyone in leadership to verify the accuracy of this girl’s testimony. If true, using unverified claims to incite war is criminally negligent. And remember, George H.W. Bush was the Director of the CIA, an agency responsible for working with accurate and contrived information.
  2. Claimed satellite photos never existed, and refuted by real ones: When a reporter purchased commercially available satellite photos of the region at the time claimed to show massive Iraqi troop build-up and submitted them to experts for analysis, US troop presence was visible on the Saudi side of the border but there was no evidence of Iraqi troops. The Kuwaiti Air Base seemed deserted in the photos. When the reporter queried Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney (later Vice President to Papa Bush’s son, George) about the satellite photos, she was told, “Trust us.” The alleged US satellite photos have never been released for reasons of “national security” (54).
8-minute video regarding the satellite photos, and Dick Cheney’s financial conflict of interest from being Halliburton’s former CEO; awarded ~$40 billion in war business in illegal no-bid contracts (here, here).


The best documentation for the history with Nayirah I searched for now is here.

The Big Picture beyond Nayirah: although fascinating to examine evidence of .01% false flag crimes with apparent video evidence of duping delight from crisis actors, We the People already have abundant and irrefutable evidence to demand arrests for Emperor’s New Clothes obvious crimes of:

The massive crimes end whenever we say we’re ready.

And hey, just from me to you: What kind of American do you call yourself if you’re not demanding arrests to lawfully stop obvious crimes that annually kill millions, harm billions, and loot trillions?

Are you an American defending limited government under our Constitution, or subject of dictators to continue these crimes with your submission?

Just who do you say you are demonstrated in thoughts, words, and actions???

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015...tor-infants-kuwait-criminally-incite-war.html
 
Some poster claimed Sandy Hook was a bunch of crisis actors. Can't remember who it was tho. Posted a photo of a parent/teacher and then another photo from some other shooting and it looked like the same lady.
 
@ nat - unfortunately, no one cares. We're lied into war all the time and nobody seriously f#%king cares.:(

@ swag - if you have a day or so, here's an interesting thread on Sandy Hook/crisis actors. Takes a while to start building up, but that's obviously why beer comes in cases, eh?
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1521
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuck C
I meant the 'no one' figuratively, WWJD. ;)

It was almost comical to see the lying war-mongers and their media drum-beaters try and backtrack after their WMD claims led to yet another conflict by claiming that everyone was fooled.

Ummmm, no. There were plenty of calmer heads trying to expose the truth before the general population became convinced that they were all going to die if something wasn't done.

Same crap, different day.
 
I meant the 'no one' figuratively, WWJD. ;)

It was almost comical to see the lying war-mongers and their media drum-beaters try and backtrack after their WMD claims led to yet another conflict by claiming that everyone was fooled.

Ummmm, no. There were plenty of calmer heads trying to expose the truth before the general population became convinced that they were all going to die if something wasn't done.

Same crap, different day.
Exactly right. And so many of them are in government or in the media that they have a vested interest in giving each other a free pass.

Same reason none of the banksters went to jail after the 2008 meltdown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
If there was true transparency, I think all of our minds would explode. It's no surprise to me that every president seems to age 20 years in the 1 or 2 terms they are in office. I cannot fathom the amount of stress that position holds.
 
1919442_10154451648623327_4766351116180013886_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kenneth Griffin
@ nat - unfortunately, no one cares. We're lied into war all the time and nobody seriously f#%king cares.:(

@ swag - if you have a day or so, here's an interesting thread on Sandy Hook/crisis actors. Takes a while to start building up, but that's obviously why beer comes in cases, eh?
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1521

I can assure you that real kids were killed at sandy hook.
 
I can assure you that real kids were killed at sandy hook.
I never said that that there weren't any kids (real OR imaginary) killed at Sandy Hook. I merely linked to a thread that, in my opinion, was "interesting." People are free to believe whatever they want. Like, for instance, saying that Jeb v. Hillary is a 'choice.' :D
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT