ADVERTISEMENT

Sorry MAGAs, Cheeto Was a Pro-War President

Lol zero new wars started under trump. Immediate war in Ukraine (again) and Israel under biden/harris. Another democrat L thread (you guys keep racking them up)
They keep embarrassing themselves. This forum is pure comedy to me. These are unserious people on here.
 
We were absolutely ROLLING ISIS by the end of Obama. Are you an intentional liar or just stupid? I, and most of us here, have the brain capacity to remember January 2017 and before, when ISIS first lost Tikrit, then Sinjar, then Ramadi, then Fallujah, then Eastern Mosul, all while Obama was President. We liberated Iraqi oil wells, we liberated their territory in Libya, we liberated their territory in Algeria, we liberated their first caliphate capital of Dabiq in Turkey, we liberated Mosul in Iraq, we liberated Kirkirk in Iraq, we liberated Qaraqash in Iraq. ISIS was down to half of Mosul, a town in Iraq , and a town in Syria. Saying Trump “defeated ISIS” is like a second string QB coming in the final possession, taking a knee, then declaring he led the team to victory.

Seriously, are you damaged?
He's obsessed with Hillary for someone who never started any wars. Maybe he has a picture of her on his bedroom ceiling? I don't know.

He prefers the Capitulator in Chief when it comes to Russia. I wonder why? Hmmmmm?
 
He's obsessed with Hillary for someone who never started any wars. Maybe he has a picture of her on his bedroom ceiling? I don't know.

Do you know how I know you don’t know how NATO ended up bombing Libya?
Ignorant comments like this.



He prefers the Capitulator in Chief when it comes to Russia. I wonder why? Hmmmmm?

I prefer to stay out of these useless wars that Hillary has supported the U.S. entering for decades.
Trillions borrowed and spent, thousands of American lives lost, and nothing gained except seeing our international reputation slagged post Cold War.
But for some reason y’all love it, and over and over support the people who made it happen.
 
They keep embarrassing themselves. This forum is pure comedy to me. These are unserious people on here.
If you think the Ukraine and Palestinian conflict started when Biden was President, you’re not serious.
 
Shucks, dude. I though you were an honest interlocutor, and that when you asked me:

“Do you truly think that FDR's prewar policies were the sine qua non that precipitated Pearl Harbor?”

You’d be willing to honestly discuss the steps that FDR took to get the Empire of Japan to attack America as Secretary of War Stimson’s diary explained.

Jokes on me! Grade school understanding of WW2 is where it’s at!
I'll do this once more because you clearly relish trying to outwit strangers on the Internet with "gotcha" data points--almost all of which lack critical context and are promoted by known conspiracy theorists sympathetic to far-right and fascist-leaning actors--and I do not wish to be an ongoing participant in your self-gratification.

You submit a single sentence from Stimson's diary (which was not a quote of FDR and also a later-recalled and transcribed paraphrase) as evidence of some conniving plot by the White House to provoke a Japanese attack that would not have otherwise come. If you study the historical record with even a drop of objectivity, you would see the plainly obvious intentions Japan had to establish a new imperial order in the Pacific by means of rape, torture, and murder of local populations. You would see the mountain of Magic intercepts that made abundantly clear that Japan was fully committed to kicking the hornet's nest by attacking the United States at some location in the Pacific. You would see that the US ceased key exports, namely oil, to a nation manifestly intent on inciting war, and that is the closest legitimate act of provocation to which you can point. (Yeah, I guess withholding the shipment of essential supplies to a nation intent on war with us is an act of pure provocation, right? Looking forward to your take on our Iran sanctions once they finally go ballistic.) You may even understand that the Tripartite Pact committed its signatories only to mutual defense in the event one was attacked, not to mutual support in the event one initiated an attack of its own, thus undermining your contention that FDR incited Pearl Harbor as a pretense to intervene in Europe. Read a source that adheres to established historiographical standards and you may learn something: https://www.archives.gov/publicatio...ined to spread,war to the allegedly arbitrary

You play a halfway decent character as a learned and discerning student of history and policy, but you are, frankly, completely full of shit. Pedantry and obfuscation do not a cogent argument make.

Your recent use of the Anakin hate meme is on point. It seems your all-consuming hatred for perceived "neocons" at every turn has consumed your capacity for rational thought based on the totality of all available evidence.

You're either a bot or an absurd troll. Either way, take your zeroes and ones elsewhere, or shove them up your ass. We can all see right through this caricature. Respond if you want, but I'm done with your fallacious nonsense. QED, comrade.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT