The homeless guy basically killed himself when he chose to threaten to kill everyone on the subway. His history of violence clearly indicates he would have killed someone given the opportunity. I LOL when I saw his old man on the news tonight, saying his boy was just turning his life around (same old song). The dead homeless guy's dad is listed as one of the top 40 most violent homeless people in NYC. The apple surely didn't fall to far from the tree in this case.
No. The state (who prosecutes capitol cases in America) decided there was no prosecutable case here against Biden. However, they did decide there was a prosecutable case vs. Trump in Florida.
Oh…so you’re saying since the state has decided not to bring any charges against Trump for J6 and now the classified documents case has been dropped, Trump hasn’t committed any crimes in those areas. Ok. Gotcha now.
The AG has made his decision. To indict a sitting President is much more complicated than filing charges at the rare level about a perceived criminal act. You understand this FAU. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence that would have made for an interesting trial regarding Trump however. Plus… the votes for a Senate Trial were questionable…a Congressional trial is much more about politics than it is the law.
Oh, old man, you are out of your element here. Bet you’d be singing a different tune if it was your old ass in that train pissing down your depends as some crackhead threatens your life. when someone threatens to kill you, they have committed assault and a choke hold is reasonable self defense, as a reasonable person would believe that threat to be serious. Maybe not on the farm, but we out here dealing with loose cannon crackheads in these cities; ain’t nobody got time to worry about anything other than survival once death threats are issued.
Sorry. He killed the guy. Either intentionally or accidently, he was responsible for the guy’s death. The jury “bought” his story. The DA was prosecuting tge crime that was committed.
Nice troll job! You even got me for a few posts. No one is this stupid so you must be faking this to get responses. Well done!!!
Juries react to the prosecutors charges. Not to the “innocence” of the defendant. The defendants presumed innocence is key to him/her receiving a fair trial…it is not evidence, per se. the state determines whether or not there is evidence /proof of a crime and presents its facts at trial… the jury decides the viability of the facts and decides accordingly. Far from a flawless system but one that is “fair” to both sides. As long as you are willing to accept verdicts such as OJ’s and this one. It ain’t perfect.
Good lord. Comparing OJ and Penny.
JFC...the only thing your ass could choke is your chicken, and I doubt that would last 6 seconds much less 6 minutes.....
Just the verdicts…both “not guilty” via the American justice system…in both cases, someone died… one case intentional and the other accidental… but the jury agreed with the defendants arguments both times despite strong evidence presented by the State. In reality, I think the mindset of both juries was quite similar going into verdict. However, this is our system of justice.
I think there is a difference between vigilante justice and someone’s stepping in to defend . Vigilante is post incident, this was in the moment of crisis. For example, if i shot amd killed am armed bank robber during his active crime, that isn’t the same as me hunting him down later and liking him.
I disagree. This guy KILLED a person. Probably a person who was mentally ill. He could have “relaxed” his chokehold and the guy would still be alive. Remember the police incident in Minneapolis…the cop was sent to jail for doing the same thing. I am not disagreeing with that verdict but I am saying that vigilante justice just cannot be tolerated if we do want to live in a civilized society. There just Cannot be exceptions.
It means exactly that.
Joel is either trolling or may actually have an extra chromosome.
It's not vigilantism, for fvck's sake. Vigilante's go out looking for trouble. This guy was riding to work when a person screamed he was about to murder people on a train and this dude reacted to that. I suppose you're against people running into burning building's to save old ladies as well. Leave it to the pros, right? Let the lady die! We don't need any of those fire vigilantes!
I'm saying this wasn't vigilante style justice. The officer you refer to was going to be found guilty no matter what, due to the politics of it.
Can you admit the officer in Minneapolis intentionally killed the man when he refused to ease the chokehold…. Much like the guy in NYC? The Minneapolis officer’s biggest sin is that he had been trained to act “professionally” and he was using an illegal/ outlawed restraint on his perp. He was found “guilty” because he was guilty, perhaps? You make an unproven assumption that has no merit in the facts and judgement of the case.
I don't think he intended to kill, no. I think he shouldn't have had the knee there, but the drugs in St. George's system contributed to his demise as much as the knee. Take one of those things away, either one, and he's alive, probably in and out of jail.
What if we told him Neely was still alive after the choke hold was released, and that multiple police officers refused to perform cpr on him after he stopped breathing.
He'd be free to point guns at more pregnant women's stomachs
Pesky facts
George Floyd also said he couldn't breathe in the car and asked to be laid on the ground
Yeah, when someone threatens to kill, that should be taken seriously. I think it’s still pretty tragic as Neely obviously had some major (untreated) mental health issues. But I definitely don’t think it’s murder, and I’m pretty okay with him not being found guilty of manslaughter too.
I’m done with this topic…just glad there were no riots after this justified outcome.
