Looks that way because they know the front runner is a well qualified jurist. They are grasping at straws with these attacks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Supreme Court Court pick #3 for President Trump folks.Post #58 on the SC, folks.
Supreme Court Court pick #3 for President Trump folks.
Supreme Court Court pick #3 for President Trump folks.
And you’re another one jerking himself off to Ginsburg’s death. Are you jerking off with @IowaHawkeyeFBnBB4Life ?Supreme Court Court pick #3 for President Trump folks.
You hated Ginsburg because she was Jewish. Why wouldn’t a Trump nominee be fair game regarding his/her religious beliefs.Looks that way because they know the front runner is a well qualified jurist. They are grasping at straws with these attacks.
Since Republicans will likely nominate Barrett based on her religious beliefs, it’s fair game for Democrats to question if it will influence her decisions.
Since Republican’s will likely nominate them based on their religious beliefs, fair game for Democrats to question if it will influence their decisions.
You hated Ginsburg because she was Jewish. Why wouldn’t a Trump nominee be fair game regarding his/her religious beliefs.
You’ve been gloating about her death for several days.You are incredible tonight. I didn’t hate RGB, and I definitely didn’t have any care in the world what her religious affiliation was. Did I disagree with how liberal she was? Absolutely.
It’s not. It is wrong if she uses her faith to make decisions in lieu of thoughtful interpretation of the constitution and precedence. 45* and Republicans are most likely picking a Catholic to overturn Roe v. Wade. Personal beliefs shouldn’t supersede the constitution. MAGAts would lose it if a Democratic POTUS chose a Muslim fundamentalist.Sure, but why is it wrong to have Christian beliefs?
It’s not. It is wrong if she uses her faith to make decisions in lieu of thoughtful interpretation of the constitution and precedence. 45* and Republicans are most likely picking a Catholic to overturn Roe v. Wade. Personal beliefs shouldn’t supersede the constitution.
You’ve been gloating about her death for several days.
Roe v Wade question could be a train wreck for her. If she says she would overturn, she is basically saying that she thinks that the nearly unanimous decision was garbage, that she knows better, and that clear precedence means little to her.Since Republicans will likely nominate Barrett based on her religious beliefs, it’s fair game for Democrats to question if it will influence her decisions.
Since Republicans will likely nominate Barrett based on her religious beliefs, it’s fair game for Democrats to question if it will influence her decisions.
Exactly!!Sure, but why is it wrong to have Christian beliefs?
Exactly!!
Dems need to hold impeachment inquries against Trump for him contemplating a coup against our election and delay this court vote.
Probably not. Dems are too wimpy. But I wish it would. Standing by while Trump openly says he will not leave office cannot be tolerated.Won't happen