ADVERTISEMENT

DeSantis

Holy shit, MAGA = mental illness.....how anyone could vote for someone that surrounds themselves with such idiots. I got five bucks DS believes this himself, he seems like an avid listener of Alex Jones
It’s funny because once liberal media says it’s a conspiracy theory I immediately think it’s more likely to be true. Their batting average over the last 5 years or so isn’t very good. I’d be willing to bet Alex Jones had a better half decade lol
 
Say you're a complete moron, without saying you're a complete moron

Please baby Jesus.......
Say you don’t have an argument without saying you don’t have an argument by using this stupid meme phrase.

Maybe switch news outlets if you think covid had anything to do with a wet market in the same town as a lab experimenting on coronavirus
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFsdisciple
Say you don’t have an argument without saying you don’t have an argument by using this stupid meme phrase.

Maybe switch news outlets if you think covid had anything to do with a wet market in the same town as a lab experimenting on coronavirus

LMAO, if it's anyone to listen to it's Alex Jones ..... delusional humans like you scare me, actually really scares me
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFSNOLE
LMAO, if it's anyone to listen to it's Alex Jones ..... delusional humans like you scare me, actually really scares me
I can’t tell if you are being serious. Have you not read about the department of energy in the past week? Or the FBI?
 
What degree of confidence is the lab leak theory? Did you bother reading that? WE WILL NEVER KNOW THE TRUTH.
So you side with the guy calling me delusional even though he “will never know the truth.”

Faucis own emails show conversations with a virologist saying parts of the virus look engineered.

“Mr. Andersen went on to note that he and his team “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.””
 
So you side with the guy calling me delusional even though he “will never know the truth.”

Faucis own emails show conversations with a virologist saying parts of the virus look engineered.

“Mr. Andersen went on to note that he and his team “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.””
I am not siding with anyone. You are the one who apparently was given all the facts by the Chinese government. Did you happen to read the the degree of confidence in the same info about the lab leak? Could it have been a lab leak, absolutely! Edit: Evidence says probably not.
 
The US Energy Dept is one of nine government intelligence groups that have assessed whether CV was leaked from a lab or not.

Two have said lab leak with one of those being low confidence

Five have said natural causes

Two have said they don't know


Cued to 5:07

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed
I am not siding with anyone. You are the one who apparently was given all the facts by the Chinese government. Did you happen to read the the degree of confidence in the same info about the lab leak? Could it have been a lab leak, absolutely! Edit: Evidence says probably not.
Well, just take solace in the fact that yesterdays conspiracy theory is tomorrows breaking news.

What evidence do you have? How do you make a statement like “probably not”?
 
Well, just take solace in the fact that yesterdays conspiracy theory is tomorrows breaking news.

What evidence do you have? How do you make a statement like “probably not”?
I have none. I should have put evidence in quotes because there is none. Edit: Low degree of certainty = probably not.
 
I am definitely not far right. Anyone that believes that their media or party has an answer in this situation is biased. Are you suggesting to only believe Fox News reporting?
Considering it was the FBI and DoE that said lab leak I’m curious why that would be a Fox News position.

“Far from right”, it’s a play on words.
 
Considering it was the FBI and DoE that said lab leak I’m curious why that would be a Fox News position.

“Far from right”, it’s a play on words.
Have you read articles from any other news source? The same reporting cited low confidence in the lab leak but you won't recognize that. It isn't a play on words. I am a proud independent. I hadn't voted Dem until Trump and I hate Hillary.
 
Have you read articles from any other news source? The same reporting cited low confidence in the lab leak but you won't recognize that. It isn't a play on words. I am a proud independent. I hadn't voted Dem until Trump and I hate Hillary.
I have, enough to know that they labeled the wet market theory low confidence as well. Seems we are at a crossroads of sorts but it seems to be trending one direction
 
Have you read articles from any other news source? The same reporting cited low confidence in the lab leak but you won't recognize that. It isn't a play on words. I am a proud independent. I hadn't voted Dem until Trump and I hate Hillary.
You called me far right, I called you far from right. That’s the play on words, you seemed to think I was calling you far right. Just wanted to help you out
 
Can you link that? Edit: Again. You are making up evidence. It only seems to be trending by far right media and MAGA politicians.
Maybe wait until I link it before you lose it.

“Four IC elements and the National Intelligence Council assess with low confidence that the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection was most likely caused by natural exposure to an animal infected with it or a close progenitor virus—a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2. These analysts give weight to China’s officials’ lack of foreknowledge, the numerous vectors for natural exposure, and other factors.”

DNI report

Hopefully this meets your strict standards
 
Maybe wait until I link it before you lose it.

“Four IC elements and the National Intelligence Council assess with low confidence that the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection was most likely caused by natural exposure to an animal infected with it or a close progenitor virus—a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2. These analysts give weight to China’s officials’ lack of foreknowledge, the numerous vectors for natural exposure, and other factors.”

DNI report

Hopefully this meets your strict standards
Thanks for the info. Thanks for proving my point. And thanks for changing the argument when you knew you were FOS.
 
Thanks for the info. Thanks for proving my point. And thanks for changing the argument when you knew you were FOS.
Ummm what? It’s states low confidence in natural exposure to an infected animal, aka the wet theory. What are you even talking about? Is this some weird way of admitting you’re wrong?
 
Ummm what? It’s states low confidence in natural exposure to an infected animal, aka the wet theory. What are you even talking about? Is this some weird way of admitting you’re wrong?
Huh. I wasn't pushing the lab leak theory. Isn't that your point? Evidence was pointing to the lab leak? Am I wrong?
 
Huh. I wasn't pushing the lab leak theory. Isn't that your point? Evidence was pointing to the lab leak? Am I wrong?
You brought up “what about the low confidence in lab leak”, I brought up natural transmission being low confidence also. You asked for a link, I gave you a link.

Seems low confidence in natural transmission is enough to say it happened that way but not the low confidence in lab leak. I don’t care what your position is, the fact that you even used low confidence as an argument in your response let’s me know that you get your information from a certain side because you had no idea that their favorited theory of wet market is low confidence too.

I suppose I could be wrong on what you were asking for when you requested a link
 
You brought up “what about the low confidence in lab leak”, I brought up natural transmission being low confidence also. You asked for a link, I gave you a link.

Seems low confidence in natural transmission is enough to say it happened that way but not the low confidence in lab leak. I don’t care what your position is, the fact that you even used low confidence as an argument in your response let’s me know that you get your information from a certain side because you had no idea that their favorited theory of wet market is low confidence too.

I suppose I could be wrong on what you were asking for when you requested a link
You obviously didn't read much of this thread. I have stated that we will NEVER know the true source. We have just proved there is low confidence in both theories. (If you read your article low confidence is because of the Chinese government). You are pushing the lab leak theory. Understand?
 
You obviously didn't read much of this thread. I have stated that we will NEVER know the true source. We have just proved there is low confidence in both theories. (If you read your article low confidence is because of the Chinese government). You are pushing the lab leak theory. Understand?
You seem pretty agreeable now, I wonder why that is. Once again, it’s not about your opinion but if you think the prevailing thought isn’t wet market theory in left leaning news then I am truly baffled by what goes on in your head. No one bats an eye when they push a low confidence theory, people on here seem pretty confident even.
I would love to talk to you in a year when low confidence gets bumped to moderate confidence (like the FBI) throughout the intelligence communities and then becomes accepted as the truth. It won’t be xenophobic by then I am sure.
 
You seem pretty agreeable now, I wonder why that is. Once again, it’s not about your opinion but if you think the prevailing thought isn’t wet market theory in left leaning news then I am truly baffled by what goes on in your head. No one bats an eye when they push a low confidence theory, people on here seem pretty confident even.
I would love to talk to you in a year when low confidence gets bumped to moderate confidence (like the FBI) throughout the intelligence communities and then becomes accepted as the truth. It won’t be xenophobic by then I am sure.
Bye. Conspiracy theorist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT