ADVERTISEMENT

Diapers Joe Biden Sued by Multiple States Over Student Loan Forgiveness Plan

RicoSuave102954

HR All-American
Jul 17, 2023
3,456
2,638
113
Montezuma, Iowa
Joe Biden's administration is facing two separate lawsuits from Republicans over plans to reduce student loan debt across the country.

The president's major plans to reduce and cancel federal student loan debts has irked Republicans, and two groups of GOP-led states are now taking legal action against both him and the Education Department.

Combined, 18 states have joined one of two lawsuits challenging the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan launched by the president in 2023.

Newsweek has contacted the Education Department for comment via email.

SAVE has since cancelled the federal student loan debts of 150,000 borrowers nationwide. More than seven million debt holders have enrolled in the program so far, according to the White House.

Which states have sued Biden and why?

In 1993, Congress granted the Education Department the power to create repayment plans for federal loan borrowers. Now, both lawsuits claim Biden and the Education Department do not have the authority to bring about new plans as they do not have the backing of Congress.

The first lawsuit was filed by Kansas attorney general Kris Kobach in March. It claims Biden and the Education Department are transforming loans "into outright grants from the federal government — without any appropriation from Congress."

This suit is backed by Alabama, Alaska, Idaho, Iowa, Louisiana, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Texas and Utah. The Education Department has declined to comment directly on the case, but said that the "Biden-Harris Administration won't stop fighting to provide support and relief to borrowers across the country—no matter how many times Republican elected officials try to stop us," according to a statement seen by The Associated Press.

The second lawsuit has been filed by Missouri attorney general Andrew Bailey in conjunction with Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, North Dakota, Ohio and Oklahoma. It makes a similar case to the first lawsuit, but also argues that Missouri-based student loan contractor MOHELA stands to face an "imminent loss of revenue" thanks to Biden's plans.

"Yet again, the President is unilaterally trying to impose an extraordinarily expensive and controversial policy that he could not get through Congress," reads the second lawsuit filed last week.

"This latest attempt to sidestep the Constitution is only the most recent instance in a long but troubling pattern of the President relying on innocuous language from decades-old statutes to impose drastic, costly policy changes on the American people without their consent."

"As Attorney General, I will protect the Constitution, which involves fighting back against the crooked Biden bailout," said Bailey. "There is no such thing as cancelling a debt, there is only shifting who will bear its weight. As a combat veteran, I paid for my education in blood, sweat, and tears, so this unconstitutional redistribution of wealth is personal for me.


"It's a slap in the face to every working American who made a different choice, and my office will use every legal tool at our disposal to halt any attempt by the Biden Administration to saddle Missourians with other people's debt."

Missouri was a central player in the suit that brought down Biden's previous student debt forgiveness plans, separate to the SAVE plan, which were thwarted by the Supreme Court in June 2023.

Biden's latest debt relief plans are adapted from this. He said in February: "In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision on my Administration's original student debt relief plan, we are continuing to pursue an alternative path to deliver student debt relief to as many borrowers as possible, as quickly as possible,"

 
Is this the correct account you wanted to post this story from?

TIA.

I'd hate for the "multiple accounts and I forgot to log out" glitch to strike you again like it did earlier. Just here to help friend.

 
"Yet again, the President is unilaterally trying to impose an extraordinarily expensive and controversial policy that he could not get through Congress," reads the second lawsuit filed last week.

"This latest attempt to sidestep the Constitution is only the most recent instance in a long but troubling pattern of the President relying on innocuous language from decades-old statutes to impose drastic, costly policy changes on the American people without their consent."

"As Attorney General, I will protect the Constitution, which involves fighting back against the crooked Biden bailout," said Bailey. "There is no such thing as cancelling a debt, there is only shifting who will bear its weight. As a combat veteran, I paid for my education in blood, sweat, and tears, so this unconstitutional redistribution of wealth is personal for me.
 
"The president can't do it, that's not even a discussion"
-Nancy Pelosi







He is going to have to find another way to buy votes.
 
Bunch of wingnut governors grand standing rather that working to better their state's population.
Good for those governors. The rule of law actually means something to them. I guess if the dictator has the correct letter behind his name it's OK to be a dictator. Screw the folks who exercise good judgement and do the right thing. People who didn't go to college, or didn't take out loans, or repaid their loans are paying for deadbeats.
 
Good for those governors. The rule of law actually means something to them. I guess if the dictator has the correct letter behind his name it's OK to be a dictator. Screw the folks who exercise good judgement and do the right thing. People who didn't go to college, or didn't take out loans, or repaid their loans are paying for deadbeats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindemann
What do you think a person sounds like when they say the words, “I’m going to the Joe Biden rally.”? I think there’d be more of a tone of duty more than excitement.

Like, “Well…I guess I better head down the the Biden rally and see what’s happening down there.” type of thing.

Whereas a person going to a Trump rally only sounds one way. “I’m heading to the Trump rally! I’m gonna see if that guy with the machine gun and pet alligator is giving free Hannity tattoos still!”
 
Everyone needs to pay their own debts.
Tell that to the bum Trump. No way you’d vote for someone like that, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: IANDFAN
Yeah!!!!


We should go after anyone with outstanding PPP, and be appriative of those that met the obligations, keeping Americans employed, who met the contract obligations.
Seems like certain people needed financial help so their businesses didn’t fold, and borrowed money to aid that. YOU BORROW IT, YOU PAY IT BACK!

I took around $52k for my student loans and have paid back well over $100k. Seems like what is being forgiven for me is simply interest.
 
Seems like certain people needed financial help so their businesses didn’t fold, and borrowed money to aid that. YOU BORROW IT, YOU PAY IT BACK!

I took around $52k for my student loans and have paid back well over $100k. Seems like what is being forgiven for me is simply interest.
So you purchased something on credit and got charged interest? Tell me more
 
  • Like
Reactions: RicoSuave102954
Hmmm, the current president is being sued trying to help people out financially. Meanwhile, the former president is in a courtroom because he cheated on his wife with a porn star. Character matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral and IANDFAN
Seems like certain people needed financial help so their businesses didn’t fold, and borrowed money to aid that. YOU BORROW IT, YOU PAY IT BACK!

I took around $52k for my student loans and have paid back well over $100k. Seems like what is being forgiven for me is simply interest.

Weasel words!
 
Seems like certain people needed financial help so their businesses didn’t fold, and borrowed money to aid that. YOU BORROW IT, YOU PAY IT BACK!

I took around $52k for my student loans and have paid back well over $100k. Seems like what is being forgiven for me is simply interest.
Seems like one had contract language foe forgiveness and one didn't.


If forgiveness en you mean transferred to people who didn't agree to that debt obligation you might have something.
 
Seems like one had contract language foe forgiveness and one didn't.


If forgiveness en you mean transferred to people who didn't agree to that debt obligation you might have something.
Translation:

Free money and and handouts for the rich = good. Free money to poor = bad. Got it 😂

CBS reported that for every job saved by ppp it cost the tax payers around $200k. I didn’t agree to that debt obligation.

Look I don’t necessarily agree with the Student loan forgiveness, and I don’t necessarily disagree with the PPP. I think the hypocrisy is bullshit and quite frankly hilarious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericram
Let's start with these 2.

Seems you need to read your own link:

Comparing the Paycheck Protection Program with student debt forgiveness is not entirely parallel, as the business loans were designed to be forgiven as long as the money went toward pandemic-related costs and expenses.

U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., whose businesses had their loans forgiven, said it "takes a special kind of idiocy to equate (student debt forgiveness) to the PPP.
 
Seems you need to read your own link:

Comparing the Paycheck Protection Program with student debt forgiveness is not entirely parallel, as the business loans were designed to be forgiven as long as the money went toward pandemic-related costs and expenses.

U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., whose businesses had their loans forgiven, said it "takes a special kind of idiocy to equate (student debt forgiveness) to the PPP.
😂 So it's OK for them but not for people who are younger and in debt because of extreme interest rates.
 
😂 So it's OK for them but not for people who are younger and in debt because of extreme interest rates.
It's OK for "them" because the contract they signed had that language in it. The student does not. In the event student loans start carrying some form of "meet this obligation and have principal reduction" language they might have a point.
 
Translation:

Free money and and handouts for the rich = good. Free money to poor = bad. Got it 😂

CBS reported that for every job saved by ppp it cost the tax payers around $200k. I didn’t agree to that debt obligation.

Look I don’t necessarily agree with the Student loan forgiveness, and I don’t necessarily disagree with the PPP. I think the hypocrisy is bullshit and quite frankly hilarious.
There isn't any hypocrisy when you realize the contracts had different wording.
 
Is this the correct account you wanted to post this story from?

TIA.

I'd hate for the "multiple accounts and I forgot to log out" glitch to strike you again like it did earlier. Just here to help friend.

Haha what's Rico's alt acct?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT