Its kind of hard to do enough, when as you said, no one seems to know what the criteria is.He's right about some things. No one knows the exact criteria from year-2-year at the end of the bubble. Is it RPI, how you finish, wins against the top 50, top 100, road wins, SOS, etc.? At the end of the day we did not do enough.
Its kind of hard to do enough, when as you said, no one seems to know what the criteria is.
Iowa was dominating.I mean, to be fair, UNC and Iowa aren't really comparable when it comes to the history of the programs. Especially recently. We also won that game by 5 points, so I wouldn't say it was an "ass whipping."
With that said, it is a bit annoying that there's such a huge deal being made out of Syracuse not being in. The only logical reason I can think of is them just thinking back to last year when Syracuse snuck in and then made a Final Four run. Last year they were 9-9 in the ACC and had 14 total losses but still made the run.
We outscored them by 2 in the first half, and 3 in the 2nd half. So we basically won each half by 1 possession. Over 1/3 of our total points came from the free throw line. Iowa did what they had to do to get a huuuuge road win, but we did not walk into Chapel Hill and dominate.Iowa was dominating.
I can't tell if you're serious.While we are bitching... why do bubble teams get better seeds than autobids. If you are team 60-68, put them on seeds 13-16.