ADVERTISEMENT

DNC more corrupt than the RNC?

It is fair. That's the rules! Everyone knows the rules in advance. They are written. There doesn't have to be a "fair" in politics. It's a pretty transparent process. Muddled up by those who want to be muddlers.

Except that you might not have 15 percent in eastern Iowa, but you're getting way more than 15 percent in western Iowa. Why should your supporters on the east side of the state not count? That's ridiculous if you call yourself a democrat.
 
LOL. Don't you mean "my party is undemocratic" ?

Nope. Form your own party if you don't like the way theirs is run.

Would I be pissed if Bernie wins the primary season and the superdelegates overruled? Of course I would, but that won't happen. If the superdelegates were ever going to do that they would have done it last time when Obama was winning the delegate race and Hillary actually won the popular vote (only if you exclude Michigan because their votes didn't count due to Michigan having their primary too soon).

They won't do that. But whatever, understanding the process isn't why you are posting in this thread anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Neither party is corrupt. Parties can nominate their own candidates any way they see fit. The party leadership is under no obligation to let the rank and file membership select its slate of candidates. The fact that they allow the rank and file a voice in the process is a relatively recent phenomenon.

Really? No corruption? I was going to say you've lost all credibility . . . but that would imply you had some.
 
Just their connections and lawyers! Oh and often they use their political connections which it turns out is part of government. But go ahead and live in your dream world.

You are a menace to rational thought. Your big gov't fantasy died when the USSR imploded. Now you're just bitter.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT