ADVERTISEMENT

Do we need to pick up a RB in the portal?

We have a couple reliable RBs but lack a home run threat in the run game. guys like kaleb and goodson and the guy won’t be named provided that element and i think we need that.
Not happening.
 
We have a couple reliable RBs but lack a home run threat in the run game. guys like kaleb and goodson and the guy won’t be named provided that element and i think we need that.
No - I think we have capable backs - rather have an elite QB
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
The chances there is a “Kaleb Johnson” available, are exceedingly low.
The way college football is now, a team like Iowa needs to be looking to upgrade every position group every offseason unless there’s an all-conference caliber player returning, along with good depth. You can’t sit back and hope to make it work with players who are just OK.

You’re right that they’re probably not going to get a guy who’s a top 2-3 back in the country, but I think they can improve the RB group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SI_NYC and desihawk
The way college football is now, a team like Iowa needs to be looking to upgrade every position group every offseason unless there’s an all-conference caliber player returning, along with good depth. You can’t sit back and hope to make it work with players who are just OK.

You’re right that they’re probably not going to get a guy who’s a top 2-3 back in the country, but I think they can improve the RB group.
There are other groups in far more need.
 
OL, QB, WR

RBs are good single and doubles hitters. Home run once in a while. Nothing like KJ who was multi home run a game

Iowa has to find a way to join the present with passing game. They’d stand no chance trying to play Kirk ball against these teams.

Imagine Iowa needing 40+ points and maybe still not being able to win
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
OL, QB, WR

RBs are good single and doubles hitters. Home run once in a while. Nothing like KJ who was multi home run a game

Iowa has to find a way to join the present with passing game. They’d stand no chance trying to play Kirk ball against these teams.

Imagine Iowa needing 40+ points and maybe still not being able to win
Db
 
  • Like
Reactions: DougFHawkeye
We have a couple reliable RBs but lack a home run threat in the run game. guys like kaleb and goodson and the guy won’t be named provided that element and i think we need that.
Moulton looked explosive on his long TD run… but I don’t think we need another RB… but if there’s a good one then by all means sure it wouldn’t hurt. QB is number 1 and then maybe a few oline… and WR like many others think
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
The way college football is now, a team like Iowa needs to be looking to upgrade every position group every offseason unless there’s an all-conference caliber player returning, along with good depth. You can’t sit back and hope to make it work with players who are just OK.

You’re right that they’re probably not going to get a guy who’s a top 2-3 back in the country, but I think they can improve the RB group.
If Iowa had unlimited spots and money, sure, but a difference maker like that probably doesn’t exist.

It’s probably not near the top of the list.

As great as he is, I’d trade him for a good QB. Doesn’t even have to be great.
 
Gimme either one of Oregon’s backs.
Damn those guys have some top wnd speed.
 
We have a couple reliable RBs but lack a home run threat in the run game. guys like kaleb and goodson and the guy won’t be named provided that element and i think we need that.

I think Jamari had a big time long TD run this year and he also had a number of double digit runs. I think he is very good, Jazz is a good running back and has had some big gains, Brevin Doll and a few others might be damn good
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
We have a couple reliable RBs but lack a home run threat in the run game. guys like kaleb and goodson and the guy won’t be named provided that element and i think we need that.
Totally agree! Just like everyone said this year that our D would be fine without DeJean, I think we are missing a major detail in personal next season. I think stud running back should be priority #1
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
I look at it this way. If KJ was a 10 on a scale from 1-10, then Moulton and Jazz are at least a 7, maybe an 8. So trying to upgrade to a 9 (a 10 ain’t coming here) doesn’t do us much and drains both time and resources.

I think we need to prioritize OL and possibly DB even before QB unless the QB is a can’t miss starter. Our LBs next year are unproven as well.

Long story short, we have unknowns across the board, but RB isn’t one of them. Focus on where we for sure know we need help first and foremost!
 
I look at it this way. If KJ was a 10 on a scale from 1-10, then Moulton and Jazz are at least a 7, maybe an 8. So trying to upgrade to a 9 (a 10 ain’t coming here) doesn’t do us much and drains both time and resources.

I think we need to prioritize OL and possibly DB even before QB unless the QB is a can’t miss starter. Our LBs next year are unproven as well.

Long story short, we have unknowns across the board, but RB isn’t one of them. Focus on where we for sure know we need help first and foremost!
imo if kj is a 10, moulton is a 5 and jaz a 3.5; so a 8 or 9 would be a significant step up. and chances are that the ol will run block far better than pass block. all said if we had to pick between a 9 qb and 9 rb, i will obviously take the qb but not between a marginally better qb and a stud rb.
 
Better OL will help the passing game, which will also open up the run game.

QB would be nice if a great one is available, but I’d be surprised if that player looks at Iowa. I think we run Sullivan as starter next year because of that.

Another WR or two would be huge gets to help Sullivan.

TE room is probably ok, but I’d still have my eyes open for the right prospect.

RB is the least of my worries on offense barring a late transfer out or an offseason injury.
 
Totally agree! Just like everyone said this year that our D would be fine without DeJean, I think we are missing a major detail in personal next season. I think stud running back should be priority #1
i think you hit the nail head with the dejean analogy. iowa needs a difference maker. this year’s dejean was kj. last year we had 2 (tory was the other)
 
I look at it this way. If KJ was a 10 on a scale from 1-10, then Moulton and Jazz are at least a 7, maybe an 8. So trying to upgrade to a 9 (a 10 ain’t coming here) doesn’t do us much and drains both time and resources.

I think we need to prioritize OL and possibly DB even before QB unless the QB is a can’t miss starter. Our LBs next year are unproven as well.

Long story short, we have unknowns across the board, but RB isn’t one of them. Focus on where we for sure know we need help first and foremost!
You might be right, but I don't think Jazz or Molten are that close to Johnson. The badgers had a Johnson almost every year and that's how they built that program for 3 decades. No reason we can't keep reloading that position now that we're the premiere rushing team in the Big Ten. Molten and Jazz are good but they're not NFL running backs.
 
imo if kj is a 10, moulton is a 5 and jaz a 3.5; so a 8 or 9 would be a significant step up. and chances are that the ol will run block far better than pass block. all said if we had to pick between a 9 qb and 9 rb, i will obviously take the qb but not between a marginally better qb and a stud rb.
If Moulton and Jazz are a 5 and a 3.5, then there is no such thing as an 8 or 9, and KB is the greatest RB of all times.
 
If Moulton and Jazz are a 5 and a 3.5, then there is no such thing as an 8 or 9, and KB is the greatest RB of all times.
in my estimation kj was indeed the best rb i’ve seen at iowa.
 
We get another KJ and we aren’t improving as a team.

Without a competent QB and OL, teams will stack 10 in the box and we stick with our 7-8 wins and no chance at playoffs

If we had a decent QB this year, maybe even it was Sullivan had he started the beginning of the year we don’t lose to ISU and MSU
 
You might be right, but I don't think Jazz or Molten are that close to Johnson. The badgers had a Johnson almost every year and that's how they built that program for 3 decades. No reason we can't keep reloading that position now that we're the premiere rushing team in the Big Ten. Molten and Jazz are good but they're not NFL running backs.
No, they had a great line and running scheme for three decades, and a threat of a passing game. They had one or two KJ level RBs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShonnDeereGreene
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT