Does this qualify as "election interference"

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

Fwiw, I don't think he could get a conviction but it might be worth pursuing juat to burn the shit out of CBS and Kamala if you are Trump.

 

[jonesy5960]

View embedded media

Fwiw, I don't think he could get a conviction but it might be worth pursuing juat to burn the shit out of CBS and Kamala if you are Trump.

Maybe. Just make sure you get out there and vote on November 6th. That's the only way to overcome this blatant election interference. Make sure you get out there and tell your friends. Maybe rent a bus to get everyone to the polls on that day. Remember. November 6th is the day we make American Great Again!!

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

Maybe. Just make sure you get out there and vote on November 6th. That's the only way to overcome this blatant election interference. Make sure you get out there and tell your friends. Maybe rent a bus to get everyone to the polls on that day. Remember. November 6th is the day we make American Great Again!!

We have a maybe.

 

[jamesvanderwulf]

Walter Cronkite spinning in his grave…

 

[LBoogie28]

Interested in OP’s thoughts here.

Who am I kidding? Of course I’m not (interested).

“Election interference” seems to be used way too frequently/casually/incorrectly.

 

[cigaretteman]

More like Pepsi.

 

[soybean]

More like Pepsi.

More like Diet Pepsi.

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

More like Diet Pepsi.

Clear pepsi!!!!!!

 

[DeangeloVickers]

View embedded media

Fwiw, I don't think he could get a conviction but it might be worth pursuing juat to burn the shit out of CBS and Kamala if you are Trump.

Of course they did this. Anymore I just assume everything coming from big media is heavily edited to whatever supports their political goals. They are not journalists, they're partisan propaganda mouthpieces.
Unfortunately most haven't figured this out yet. But more are everyday.

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

Of course they did this. Anymore I just assume everything coming from big media is heavily edited to whatever supports their political goals. They are not journalists, they're partisan propaganda mouthpieces.
Unfortunately most haven't figured this out yet. But more are everyday.

But at that level, and being presented thr way that it was, would it qualify as."election interference"?

 

[Aardvark86]

If that is election interference, this entire board should be worried, regardless of who is elected.

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

If that is election interference, this entire board should be worried, regardless of who is elected.

I tend to agree this won't go anywhere, but, i do value your opinion.


Do their creditials or platform as a news" network impact that?

 

[Aardvark86]

I tend to agree this won't go anywhere, but, i do value your opinion.


Do their creditials or platform as a news" network impact that?

absolutely. presumptive first amendment protection, and they can push whatever opinion they want.