You're looking at polling .00039% (1,000 of 253 million) of the country vs .039% (100,000 of 253 million) of the country.And I'm looking at that 3.9 +/- error.
All good.
Do you think it would drop it below 3.9 +/- error?
You're looking at polling .00039% (1,000 of 253 million) of the country vs .039% (100,000 of 253 million) of the country.And I'm looking at that 3.9 +/- error.
All good.
Keep in mind, that poster is almost always woefully ignorant on how things actually work - statistical polling being just one example.
He is a good example of what i consider to be among the most frustrating types of people that exist - ones that are of average to below-average intelligence that think they are super smart and can see the “angles” actually smart people can’t. It would be funny if it wasn’t so annoying.
Shit son I haven't had to run numbers like that in 15 years... we would need a T test?You're looking at polling .00039% (1,000 of 253 million) of the country vs .039% (100,000 of 253 million) of the country.
Do you think it would drop it below 3.9 +/- error?
Iowa fans watching our offense.America specializes in confident-stupid people.
I know you'd prefer anne selzerRasmussen. You might as well just ask Bonespurs himself…
Problem with that is that it's an easy question to say yes to, much harder to find something significant that has 61% agreeing they want to cut or eliminate that.
Downsizing the government always sounds good in theory but when you actually start trying to make significant cuts then people start getting upset.
Whole Lotta projection in this post.Keep in mind, that poster is almost always woefully ignorant on how things actually work - statistical polling being just one example.
He is a good example of what i consider to be among the most frustrating types of people that exist - ones that are of average to below-average intelligence that think they are super smart and can see the “angles” actually smart people can’t. It would be funny if it wasn’t so annoying.
Ok, so lets say you poll 100,000 people and it adjusts all of the numbers 1% and has a 3.5% +/- confidence rate instead of 3.9%Shit son I haven't had to run numbers like that in 15 years... we would need a T test?
Come on brain work...
Was worth it... let me work it... flip down and reverse it.... nobody knows what she says next....Ok, so lets say you poll 100,000 people and it adjusts all of the numbers 1% and has a 3.5% +/- confidence rate instead of 3.9%
Was it worth polling the extra 99,000 people so everyone can spend about 13 seconds looking at basically the same information?
Democrats taught us to love it.
“Stroke of the pen. Law of the Land. Kinda cool.”
-Paul Begala, July 5, 1998, referring to executive orders.
That's because it's what she said the line before but reversed. because she reversed it.Was worth it... let me work it... flip down and reverse it.... nobody knows what she says next....
Idk man, this is dumb fodder foe us anyway. Have you seen the boobs thread?
Iowa fans watching our offense.
Ha.Wait, you come out of the valley of despair?
Ha.
There is an article out that says Ohio state is looking at taking Phil Parker.
🎶 hello darkness my old friend.... 🎶
I learned something new today.That's because it's what she said the line before but reversed. because she reversed it.
"Ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gnaht ym tup i"
But yes, it is dumb fodder. But at least it's a civil discussion, right?
I doubt he goes to OSU unless he wants a natty.Oof. That would not be good. But, as they say, the rich get richer.
I doubt he goes to OSU unless he wants a natty.
Wasn't USC ready to park a dump truck full of cash in front of his house last year?
He would have crazy good athletes, but he would prob need 2-3 years to get the players to learn his system.Yeah, I’m not too concerned about it. He’s making bank at Iowa and the pressure cooker known as OSU? Not seeing it.
So I'm the guy who shows up 2 minutes after tee time, wearing sandals, and beats your ass by 20 strokes
Was not only my ballot.Trump voters voted to end the world as we know it. And when the leopard comes to eat their face, as it surely will in the new world they've created, L oh effing L.
I'm thinking that stats aren't his strong suit.Statistically speaking, as long as the sample group is truly random then the numbers aren't going to change much beyond 1000. Meaning if you surveyed 100,000 people you would get basically the same percentages.
Everybody votes yes on cuts until it’s their program.61% support for downsizing government is good news.