Are Americans really so lazy that they need 20 days before election day to vote early? I personally think that 10 days is plenty because you have 2 weekends.
Hillary just made it a campaign issue. She is saying that if you are against the 20 day period, you are trying to prevent people from voting. I just disagree with the whole argument. I can understand having the early voting so that people can work around their work schedule to get to the polls. But what is the argument that you cannot get your voting done during a 10 day period therefore you need 20 days.
My main concern with the extra 10 days is cost. We're requiring every municipality in America to accommodate early voting for 3 weeks at their own expense. I can't even imagine how much that is costing.Why do you care about that extra 10 days? I've been voting since 1992 and while I've voted for a variety of parties over the years, I don't recall ever changing my mind on who I was going to vote for in the last two weeks after I made up my mind. If that 10 days helps a few more people get to the polls, what's the problem?
My main concern with the extra 10 days is cost. We're requiring every municipality in America to accommodate early voting for 3 weeks at their own expense. I can't even imagine how much that is costing.
If she was for a 10 day period, many on the right would argue for 5 days. Many would argue against more than 12 hours, if that.Hillary just made it a campaign issue. She is saying that if you are against the 20 day period, you are trying to prevent people from voting. I just disagree with the whole argument. I can understand having the early voting so that people can work around their work schedule to get to the polls. But what is the argument that you cannot get your voting done during a 10 day period therefore you need 20 days.
If she was for a 10 day period, many on the right would argue for 5 days. Many would argue against more than 12 hours, if that.
I also find it very very interesting that New York does not have early voting at all. Just election day. Why is that?
I think this is going the wrong direction. We don't need early voting, we need e-voting. I want to sit on my couch and vote with my tablet, or vote with my phone at lunchtime. Don't say it can't be done, we do trillions in banking and investing by those devices, no reason we can't vote that way.
I also find it very very interesting that New York does not have early voting at all. Just election day. Why is that?
I just looked at the states that don't have early voting. Sure looks like a lot of Blue states don't allow it. Interesting.
Explain why it's interesting.I just looked at the states that don't have early voting. Sure looks like a lot of Blue states don't allow it. Interesting.
Hell montross...I could probably vote today for 2016. I bet you could too.Are Americans really so lazy that they need 20 days before election day to vote early? I personally think that 10 days is plenty because you have 2 weekends.
Fair enough. I was just wondering if you think this will end up being a significant talking point during the campaign.It is interesting because Hillary just said the other day that the GOP is preventing people from voting because they are not allowing more early voting. The states that she mentions are swing states and they already have early voting of some kind. It is interesting to me because if she truly cared about people getting the opportunity to vote, she would make sure that she directed her talking point to the Blue states that don't have early voting. Of course those don't matter because they are already Blue therefore it can't help her win more states in the general election.
I can't believe that New York doesn't have early voting with all of the people there.
It is interesting because Hillary just said the other day that the GOP is preventing people from voting because they are not allowing more early voting. The states that she mentions are swing states and they already have early voting of some kind. It is interesting to me because if she truly cared about people getting the opportunity to vote, she would make sure that she directed her talking point to the Blue states that don't have early voting. Of course those don't matter because they are already Blue therefore it can't help her win more states in the general election.
I can't believe that New York doesn't have early voting with all of the people there.
Explain why it's interesting.
Maybe because getting a concealed carry permit requirement is different from getting a college student ID in Texas.Why don't certain states have early voting? Which states don't? Do they make up for it with extended hours on election day? Are the states more likely to be unionized where the workers are guaranteed election day off?
Cutting off access to the polls is un-American. Allowing a concealed carry permit to be valid ID in Texas, but not allowing a college student's ID to be valid is horrible. Closing polling stations in minority districts and forcing them to travel to vote is horrible. Allowing pollsters to shutoff voting at 5pm while people wait in line is horrible. Everything should be done to promote a higher turnout. But, this is what the Republican Party needs to do in order to win in some states. Suppress minority and youth voting, and gerrymander the s*** out of some districts.
That's a legit point. There is a balance in there.
Hmm Sunday is my Jesus day.Hillary is right to bring this issue up. Republican governors have created a lot of dark corners that they don't want light shone on in the last few years. It's been a concerted effort to keep minorities and young voters away from the polls.
And, I still don't like her. Just to be clear. One big thing that would help is holding elections on Sunday's. Lot's of nations around the world do this. It's the one day of the week where there would be the fewest conflicts for people to get to the polls.
That might be against their religion.The way to do it is to run the early voting from the county registrar's office. Those people are just sitting around doing nothing anyway.
What better time to remind you to vote like Jesus would?Hmm Sunday is my Jesus day.
We don't have an early voting laziness problem we have a voting laziness problem.
It doesn't read like you actually think voting is an obligation. It reads like you think jumping through some rather arbitrary hoops is an obligation. But I do appreciate that you frame it correctly, even if you fail to base your policy position on that principle.I don't see this as a problem. I think voting is an obligation, and it takes some effort. I think that voting should have to be in person on a designated election day, absent a valid reason for an absentee ballot.
Making it too easy to vote simple encourages the lazy, low information types to cast careless ballots. If you do not care enough to get to the polls, then you probably are not well-informed enough to vote.