ADVERTISEMENT

Election Deniers: what specifically would it take for you to trust the process?

Yea take 16 days to sort out that Ship show and
here we are.

Screw confidence, its too Democrat for our system of government.

Guess you missed the part where I stated.

I will accept the election after the court process. That is our current system. I will accept their ruling after the process is complete.

But yea, improving confidence with sensible actions and improvements. I don't want to hear about the improvements Iowa put in place after that shit show. Because you know it worked so well.

Fish on fellow resistance comades!
 
While Trump isn't a perfect man, the other side's goals of basically eliminating everything that made this country great forced any American to vote to preserve our great nation.
Getting rid of trump is the only thing that could make us great. And that we will whether him and his moron cult are willing or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFSNOLE
But you weren't posting about it. Why are you posting about it now? Why all the outrage now?

Is it because your candidate lost?


Pulling out the "money ball" your position was not stated on HROT. No HROT,.no validity.

While ignoring the "Fact" that Democrats themselves were just arguing and in court, against themselves a few months ago.

Take off the "Rose" colored glasses comrade. Hypocrisy is a cornerstone of our party I know but c'mon man.

Que Mainstream 1% media to align the coalition. Commence action, destroy my character.

Fish on comrade, good to know you sell out so fast. Will remember that in 2022.
 
You can’t possibly be so stupid as to think technology problems with the Iowa Democratic caucus is in any way related to general elections, can you?

People like you are destroying our democracy, and I don’t say that lightly.
pete just said he won iowa. does not matter if he did or not

now we got biden just saying he maybe is on mars and maybe not
 
I have two daughters that graduated college and moved away but still voted as if they lived at home. Just curious if they also registered to vote in their new Iowa counties if anybody would be wise to the fact they are registered in two places?
 
I have two daughters that graduated college and moved away but still voted as if they lived at home. Just curious if they also registered to vote in their new Iowa counties if anybody would be wise to the fact they are registered in two places?

Seriously?
 
I have two daughters that graduated college and moved away but still voted as if they lived at home. Just curious if they also registered to vote in their new Iowa counties if anybody would be wise to the fact they are registered in two places?
I believe if they register in a new county, they are asked where they were previously registered...they may even be asked to produce their voters registration card. I carry one of those...I have for years. Do you?
 
I believe if they register in a new county, they are asked where they were previously registered...they may even be asked to produce their voters registration card. I carry one of those...I have for years. Do you?
No idea. I just walk in and show drivers license and they let me vote. Never have I shown voters registration card to vote and am over 50.
 
Seriously what?
I have no idea if they are cross matching people that register to vote in two different districts.

It would be a pretty sorry state that didn't track that. As it happens, you are only registered once in the state, with your current address. If you move you don't register a second time and cancel the old one -- you just update your existing registration.

Now, certainly, when you move to another state you can be registered in two states. But these days states share the information, so when I registered in a new state it didn't take long before my old state sent me a letter informing me they were dropping me from their rolls.

Honestly, these people do have an idea what they're doing. Give them some credit. Don't let Trump make you think it's just a free-for-all out there.
 
I want to know, who should be in charge of the Election, on a national and state basis. What specific actions have to take place for you to actually have faith that the Election was conducted fairly? There were cameras in the counting rooms, we know there were equal number of observers from both parties. Do you want elections completely nationalized? Do you want every person in every corner of the country to show up and verbally "declare" their vote so that there are no secret ballots whatsoever (and in theory everyone could tally along at home?). The craziest part to me at all is that Trump actually IMPROVED in many cities, even getting a better margin in Philadelphia than he was in 2016. Regarding Detroit, the turnout was still not even terribly high. It was actually one of the lowest in the country, and a simple google of the population of Wayne County and Detroit....compared to the number of ballots actually illustrates that. So I really want to know, what else could have possibly been done with the election this year to make it "believable"?

You guys have a long way to go to convince me this isn't just sour grapes. The biggest reason I feel that way is because you all voted, and you're probably going to vote next time, too. I don't think you would vote if you TRULY believed the outcome was pre-determined or that your vote would not count.
Long post, you didn't address any of their allegations. Hundreds of thousands of ballots showing up with only Biden selected (no senator, congress, local), machine software manipulation, etc. I don't know about any of this, but if you're going to throw this out, "sour grapes" can't be your rationale
 
Long post, you didn't address any of their allegations. Hundreds of thousands of ballots showing up with only Biden selected (no senator, congress, local), machine software manipulation, etc. I don't know about any of this, but if you're going to throw this out, "sour grapes" can't be your rationale

Undervotes happen in EVERY election, and it's not surprising we got more this time in one with such high turnout. When there's high turnout, that means many people are going who may have limited or next to no knowledge about the government at all.

Machine software manipulation? This would be BY FAR the easiest thing to prove in court with expert witnesses and computer forensic investigators in a VERY short amount of time. They've not done so.
 
Long post, you didn't address any of their allegations. Hundreds of thousands of ballots showing up with only Biden selected (no senator, congress, local), machine software manipulation, etc. I don't know about any of this, but if you're going to throw this out, "sour grapes" can't be your rationale

The courts are laughing at your argument. Not one taker. Are all the courts in every state in the take ?

This is sad and not at all sour grapes. It’s the courts of the land.

Admit it. The right is supporting a true anti-American baby who is deliberately trying to hurt the entire country. He is trying to have the entire city of Detroit’s votes thrown out.
And the right is supportive of ignoring the votes.
 
Long post, you didn't address any of their allegations. Hundreds of thousands of ballots showing up with only Biden selected (no senator, congress, local), machine software manipulation, etc. I don't know about any of this, but if you're going to throw this out, "sour grapes" can't be your rationale

He didn’t mention those because only the dumbest dipshits believe any of those things; people too far gone to have a rational conversation with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFSNOLE
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT