Hmm. Can you expand on that?No. I think you read too much into what I said.
Hmm. Can you expand on that?No. I think you read too much into what I said.
Not sure how much clearer I can make it. Dems want some type of universal Healthcare. Rs want reduced funding for overseas defense.Hmm. Can you expand on that?
In her defense, she's not very smart...Not sure how much clearer I can make it. Dems want some type of universal Healthcare. Rs want reduced funding for overseas defense.
In my proposal, both sides get what they want. I don't understand your confusion
I’m not confused. I’m thinking that many D’s are good with supplying overseas defense forces. Many businesses in their states rely on supplying both our installations as well as supplying the defense forces of the host countries.Not sure how much clearer I can make it. Dems want some type of universal Healthcare. Rs want reduced funding for overseas defense.
In my proposal, both sides get what they want. I don't understand your confusion
Aren’t you sweet to come to my defense.In her defense, she's not very smart...
Health care for all is a lofty goal and no one is turned away from an ER. It’s the law.
But your statement about billionaires and tax breaks…is that intentionally dumb?
Our diagnostic radiology charged 10 times what a typical insurance charged. I had a series of CT scans over time, each time my employer charged over $3K when our insurance paid a little over $300.
LMAO you dumb c&nt.
Right, that's the point. Each side gives up something they like while getting something they like. That's a tradeoff and that's how negotiations work. Again, not sure why you keep responding back in ways that indicate you are confused by my proposal.I’m not confused. I’m thinking that many D’s are good with supplying overseas defense forces. Many businesses in their states rely on supplying both our installations as well as supplying the defense forces of the host countries.
you keep attempting to portray me as confused…not sure why you’re doing that…Right, that's the point. Each side gives up something they like while getting something they like. That's a tradeoff and that's how negotiations work. Again, not sure why you keep responding back in ways that indicate you are confused by my proposal.
$1100 with insurance, ED bill is quite reasonable in today’s America.I don't believe it.
Just had a kid in the ER.
Two X-rays, IV, pain meds, couple of visits from the doctor just like you say.
Was something like $2.5k BEFORE insurance.
Yes a CT would be more than an X-ray, but we had two scan charges.
I have a hard time believing what she told you. Not to mention, she already received her bill? That's record timing.
BTW, I think out of pocket we ended up paying $1.1k.
Cash prices are often cheaper, because there is little to no paperwork.The huge disparity in costs for the same exact procedure; for what one without any health insurance pays vs a health insurer pays is something I just don’t understand.
I have some pretty good background with auto insurance claims and home insurance claims; repair vendors generally charge the same for the same work, regardless of who is paying. In fact they often charge an insurance company more.
$1100 with insurance, ED bill is quite reasonable in today’s America.
Several years ago I had a hip replacement. I pre-paid my doc $1000. I had a normal surgery, 3 day stay in hospital. I had 10 rehab sessions. My hospital bill for all this was $36000.
A couple of weeks later, I received my “explanation of benefits” and all the above (with insurance) cost me $11600.
So my question Then, as it is today is , What does a hip replacement cost? $12,60 (which I paid w/ co-pay and insurance)….or $36,000 (My ”cost” if I self-paid.)
It depends on who you're talking the cost is for. The cost for your insurance company was $11,600. The cost for you was $1,000. The cost to the hospital was somewhere between that and the original $36,000. Maybe. If a hospital is lucky their total cost was lower than what the insurance paid them. So they made some type of profit. But that's not always the case, which is why many hospitals you see lose money. Insurance payment and your payment may have been less than their cost of the personnel, materials, professional fee to the doc(s).$1100 with insurance, ED bill is quite reasonable in today’s America.
Several years ago I had a hip replacement. I pre-paid my doc $1000. I had a normal surgery, 3 day stay in hospital. I had 10 rehab sessions. My hospital bill for all this was $36000.
A couple of weeks later, I received my “explanation of benefits” and all the above (with insurance) cost me $11600.
So my question Then, as it is today is , What does a hip replacement cost? $12,60 (which I paid w/ co-pay and insurance)….or $36,000 (My ”cost” if I self-paid.)
Cash prices can actually be higher also. Because it's based on the chargemaster, which is set at the highest rate possible. No insurance negotiated contract paying less. So you're left as one individual holding the bag on that. Unless as mentioned above you can negotiate that down. Which is best done prior to any hospital service versus after.Cash prices are often cheaper, because there is little to no paperwork.
But, you have to have the cash, and you have to "negotiate" against a very large corporation that runs the hospital, which - as an individual - is not an easy negotiation.
The huge disparity in costs for the same exact procedure; for what one without any health insurance pays vs a health insurer pays is something I just don’t understand.
That's a good example. The only caveat I would throw in there is these are not actually charges listed in the example above. They are agreed upon reimbursement amounts. The charge that starts at the top is as stated the same for all these folks, as set by the chargemaster. Then negotiated down by contract to these amounts. 👍They have operating overheads to cover just like any other business. The problem they deal with is that many of their reimbursements are dictated, so the only way they can balance their books is to vary the charges. Let's say that procedure "X" has an honest value of $100, and that (5) different patients receive this service, and the hospital needs to collect $500 to recover costs. Reality begins to look something like the following:
Patient 1 - Indigent - $0
Patient 2 - Medicaid - $50
Patient 3 - Medicare - $75
Patient 4 - Private Insurance - $150
Patient 5 - Cash - $225
Total recovered cost $500
So it’s ONLY the GOP who wants to fund such things?
You sure about that? 😏
It's because of your initial response to my post. I never once said it was only the GOP who wanted to fund such things. In fact, I basically implied the opposite That was my point. The GOP doesn't want to fund it.you keep attempting to portray me as confused…not sure why you’re doing that…
Hmm. Yes I am.
Up your game. 😉
Correct,.. These are intended to reflect reimbursement values. Actual entry charge for all of these categories would likely be something like $300, and then negotiated down to a reimbursement value,.. Thing to understand though is that patients 1, 2 & 3 don't negotiate...That's a good example. The only caveat I would throw in there is these are not actually charges listed in the example above. They are agreed upon reimbursement amounts. The charge that starts at the top is as stated the same for all these folks, as set by the chargemaster. Then negotiated down by contract to these amounts. 👍