ADVERTISEMENT

Ex Benghazi investigator admits it was a fraud aimed at Hillary

I suspect more people will feel emboldened to tell the truth now that McCarthy spilled the beans.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/10/polit...lary-clinton-brad-podliska-lawsuit/index.html

I doubt very much that any of the Republicans on this board will bother reading this article. Just imagine if there was testimony that an investigator for a democratic organization said that he was ordered by the White House to focus only on Republicans. In this case, since it is the opposite, a simple denial by the committee is sufficient. No reason to investigate.

Yet more evidence that the Benghazi committee is nothing but an illegal use of public funds for political purposes. Gowdy belongs in jail.
 
So, it's true, you can't read.

I read it.

The beauty of Benghazi is this...

If it is determined that there was no scandal, then it just proves that Hillary was incompetent and piss poor at her job.

So worst case scenario, we have a presidential candidate that has proven her incompetence in front of Congress.

As if her resume wasn't poor enough.
 
I read it.

The beauty of Benghazi is this...

If it is determined that there was no scandal, then it just proves that Hillary was incompetent and piss poor at her job.

So worst case scenario, we have a presidential candidate that has proven her incompetence in front of Congress.

As if her resume wasn't poor enough.
So you admit that its goal is to attack Hillary.
 
A Bush official told us Iraq was all a lie, but Rs still don't believe it. Why would this be different? Facts don't matter to that team. They make up videos, ignore science and only listen to people who tell them what they want to hear. Because they aren't driven by policy. They aren't actually trying to achieve results. They just want the world to behave according to the rules they think make sense, reality be damned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BABiscuit
A Bush official told us Iraq was all a lie, but Rs still don't believe it. Why would this be different? Facts don't matter to that team. They make up videos, ignore science and only listen to people who tell them what they want to hear. Because they aren't driven by policy. They aren't actually trying to achieve results. They just want the world to behave according to the rules they think make sense, reality be damned.

Don't make me insert jonathangruber.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: fredjr82
I doubt very much that any of the Republicans on this board will bother reading this article. Just imagine if there was testimony that an investigator for a democratic organization said that he was ordered by the White House to focus only on Republicans. In this case, since it is the opposite, a simple denial by the committee is sufficient. No reason to investigate.

Yet more evidence that the Benghazi committee is nothing but an illegal use of public funds for political purposes. Gowdy belongs in jail.
This is exactly what the IRS did to Republican non profit groups. No lib on here had a problem with it. What I read on the article is he was fired. Now he is coming forth with these charges maybe to prop up a lawsuit. And all you kool aid drinkers are lining up.
 
This is exactly what the IRS did to Republican non profit groups. No lib on here had a problem with it. What I read on the article is he was fired. Now he is coming forth with these charges maybe to prop up a lawsuit. And all you kool aid drinkers are lining up.

That's exactly my point. Similar allegations against Democrats, oh my god there's months of investigations. In this case it's going to be shrug, nothing to see here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
So, it's true, you can't read.
Did you read it? It didn't in any way say Hilary was innocent. It simply stated that it appeared that her failure was used against her for political reasons.
Does that change the the accuracy of the allegations. Or is it not fair and therefore not admissible?
 
A Bush official told us Iraq was all a lie, but Rs still don't believe it. Why would this be different? Facts don't matter to that team. They make up videos, ignore science and only listen to people who tell them what they want to hear. Because they aren't driven by policy. They aren't actually trying to achieve results. They just want the world to behave according to the rules they think make sense, reality be damned.
Neither did the Democrats, as they were the ones who first pushed he WMD lies. The blame was plentiful in that conversation.
 
Liberals really need to actually look at the details of this investigation. This was probably a Hillary witch hunt at first but it has exposed some damaging evidence. The FBI is involved for a reason. A GOP witch hunt alone wouldn't bring in the FBI. Trey's letter to Cummings last week really shows the shit storm she is in. Those emails are new emails by the way. The FBI just went to the State Department and took 4 more servers.

It is also very interesting to see the emails from the Hillary server company discussing the other company that backs up their servers. Employees discussing amongst each other about some shady shit. The 2nd company who backed up the server will be the nail in this coffin.

In conclusion, this is no longer about Bengazi. The investigation led to the discovery of the private server and email account...and it took legs from there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N_fuego
Liberals really need to actually look at the details of this investigation. This was probably a Hillary witch hunt at first but it has exposed some damaging evidence. The FBI is involved for a reason. A GOP witch hunt alone wouldn't bring in the FBI. Trey's letter to Cummings last week really shows the shit storm she is in. Those emails are new emails by the way. The FBI just went to the State Department and took 4 more servers.

It is also very interesting to see the emails from the Hillary server company discussing the other company that backs up their servers. Employees discussing amongst each other about some shady shit. The 2nd company who backed up the server will be the nail in this coffin.

In conclusion, this is no longer about Bengazi. The investigation led to the discovery of the private server and email account...and it took legs from there.

So let's say this entirely true. Are you ok with investigating someone, using governmental resources, until you find something to pin on someone? Is that where we are going now? We may have a democratic senate in 2017. Would it be ok to initiate an investigation into President Rubio, perhaps initiated by a preventable attack on an embassy, that becomes all encompassing into his activities before and after his inauguration? Perhaps they could find something and that would make it ok. Is that where we are?

Doesn't that make you righties just a little nervous? Or is it ok because it's Hillary?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
Look at the Scooter libby investigation. That started as an investigation into who leaked the CIA agents name. The investigators knew right away who leaked the name but the investigation turned into a perjury investigation into Scooter.

The Clinton impeachment situation started as a sexual harassment investigation with Flowers. Led to stuff about Monica. Bill was asked and lied.

The FBI isn't looking into Bengazi stuff. However, the Bengazi committee investigation led to the discover of the secret email account and server. Hillary has changed her tune on her answers along the way. The latest emails with Sidney open up new questions that need to be further looked into.

One interesting difference however is that the FBI is balls deep on this one boys. Trey can drop the committee tomorrow but that won't stop the FBI.
 
I would also like to add that the democrats had numerous investigations into the 911 attacks as well as investigations into the CIA info on Iraq WMD.
 
So you admit that its goal is to attack Hillary.

It may have started that way...sure. However through the course of the smear campaign, lots of smoke is beginning to swirl and it looks like there could be some substance to her illegal use of email, classified documents, etc. If it was a pure smear campaign you wouldn't see federal investigators who report to Obama involved here. You need to open your eyes.
 
A clinton official told us bengahzi was all a lie, but Ds still don't believe it. Why would Iraq be different? Facts don't matter to that team. They make up videos, sleep with science and only listen to people who tell them what they want to hear. Because they aren't driven by policy. They aren't actually trying to achieve results. They just want the world to behave according to the rules they think make sense, reality be damned.
FIFY
 
so, somebody killed a us embassador to make Hillary look bad? inside job? are you saying Hillary had him killed to make repubs look bad, to make herself look good? like what bill Clinton did in okc? interesting.
 
I read it.

The beauty of Benghazi is this...

If it is determined that there was no scandal, then it just proves that Hillary was incompetent and piss poor at her job.

So worst case scenario, we have a presidential candidate that has proven her incompetence in front of Congress.

As if her resume wasn't poor enough.


I thought the goal of the committee was to find out what happened at Benghazi and not get HRC?
 
I thought the goal of the committee was to find out what happened at Benghazi and not get HRC?
the goal is to get at the guilty party and she was gun running and doing typical Clinton dirty deals and being a criminal, and she wakes up a criminal in the morning, so the deal is to get at the dirty guilty criminal, be that Hillary or somebody else, but most likely hillary
 
what the liberals seem to forget is we 've got four dead americans, but no, let's not worry about that, let's worry about queen Hillary's stellar reputation so she and her girlfriends can live in peace and not be bothered by the minions and peasants with their petty worries about dead bodies piling up
 
Well, that guy certainly has the libs on the board acting like they fell into a vat of Viagra.
And, why not? You can say he has an ax to grind, and that he is making speculative assertions, but he was right there in the middle of it all. I assumed people would immediately attack him for having personal motivations, but, since nobody has jumped in with that response I take it to mean the right knows the sham investigation has been exposed.
 
That's exactly my point. Similar allegations against Democrats, oh my god there's months of investigations. In this case it's going to be shrug, nothing to see here.
CNN is getting out that guy who was fired, is sueing and trying to get some
A Bush official told us Iraq was all a lie, but Rs still don't believe it. Why would this be different? Facts don't matter to that team. They make up videos, ignore science and only listen to people who tell them what they want to hear. Because they aren't driven by policy. They aren't actually trying to achieve results. They just want the world to behave according to the rules they think make sense, reality be damned.

Make up videos???? Ignore science??? listen to people who only tell them what they want to hear??? I did not think you were this kind of flamer. I thought you were more reasonable.
 
Make up videos???? Ignore science??? listen to people who only tell them what they want to hear??? I did not think you were this kind of flamer. I thought you were more reasonable.
I thought it was common knowledge I'm a flamer? :D
 
I like pics, post away. See if you can find some sexy ones.

So you either agree with him that Gruber did amounts to the same thing as you're accusing the GOP, or you're doing exactly as what you say the GOP is doing and ignoring/dismissing it.
 
So you either agree with him that Gruber did amounts to the same thing as you're accusing the GOP, or you're doing exactly as what you say the GOP is doing and ignoring/dismissing it.
I'm certainly dismissing it as the same. But you're welcome to try to change my mind.
 
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/10/wat...zi-panel-this-has-been-a-partisan-witch-hunt/
Democratic strategist Donna Brazile on Sunday lashed out at Republicans on CNN’s State of the Union for trying to defend Benghazi investigations even after they had been linked to partisan efforts to destroy Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

In an interview that aired on Sunday, Major Bradley Podliska told CNN’s Jake Tapper that Republicans on the House Select Committee on Benghazi fired him because he was more interested in getting to the truth behind the Benghazi attack than he was in using the committee to smear Clinton.

After former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli told a CNN panel that the Benghazi committee was important because “Americans have real questions,” Brazile interrupted.

“Let me stop you,” she said. “Because we’ve had eight investigative hearings. The State Department has spent $14 million responding to congressional requests. We know the defense department has spent an insurmountable amount of man and women hours. If Mr. [Trey] Gowdy and his Select Committee was interested in getting to the truth, they would have brought witnesses throughout the year to talk to intelligence, to talk to defense, to talk to the State Department.”

“This has been a partisan witch hunt,” Brazile continued. “What are they investigating now? Where are the public hearings? $4.6 million of taxpayers’ money.”

The Democratic strategist argued that Chairman Gowdy had not called former Defense Secretaries Robert Gates or Leon Panetta to testify “because he’s not interested in getting to the truth of what happened to four Americans. He wants to take down Hillary Clinton and that has been proven.”
 
I read it.

The beauty of Benghazi is this...

If it is determined that there was no scandal, then it just proves that Hillary was incompetent and piss poor at her job.

So worst case scenario, we have a presidential candidate that has proven her incompetence in front of Congress.

As if her resume wasn't poor enough.

22...the sad thing for you and your thought. is that Hilary doesn't have to win election in Congress...."we the people" still make that decision.
Becareful how and where you use the word "incompetence"...especially in a sentence with "Congress" in it.
 
22...the sad thing for you and your thought. is that Hilary doesn't have to win election in Congress...."we the people" still make that decision.
Becareful how and where you use the word "incompetence"...especially in a sentence with "Congress" in it.

I am fully aware how dumb we the people tend to be.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT