ADVERTISEMENT

Excellent article by Andrew Sullivan on why, despite some of the ding dongs

What do you consider to be the policies or platforms embraced by the majority of Democrats that are "far left"?
Universal health care, universal basic income, equity of outcomes… read sullivans article. He articulates it pretty well
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
Universal health care, universal basic income, equity of outcomes… read sullivans article. He articulates it pretty well
Universal healthcare is the only policy that Democrats widely support.

So given that you are against universal healthcare, what should happen to someone without insurance or means who goes to the ER with an injury or illness? To be consistent with what your view is you would have to advocate turning them away and letting them suffer.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: binsfeldcyhawk2
Republicans in Florida have encouraged mail in ballots for decades and have been damn successful at utilizing it. It’s only been since orange man couldn’t accept defeat that my party has started crying over it.
That’s not true. Mail in ballots and ballot harvesting were previously issues that have been debated by both Republicans and democrats.


I don’t care about trump.
 
Universal healthcare is the only policy that Democrats widely support.

So given that you are against universal healthcare, what should happen to someone without insurance or means who goes to the ER with an injury or illness? To be consistent with what your view is you would have to advocate turning them away and letting them suffer.
Equity of outcomes is widely supported by democrats.
 
That’s not true. Mail in ballots and ballot harvesting were previously issues that have been debated by both Republicans and democrats.


I don’t care about trump.
Yes, both parties promoted mail in ballots, but Republicans made it an art form. Again, it wasn’t until 2020 that the R party started bitching.
 
What’s happening here is the left was able to change voting rules under the guise of emergency. They liked the results and want to make those changes permanent and you’re a racist engaging in voter suppression if you don’t agree that little ms blue hair can go to inner city Detroit and go pick up mailed out ballots from whomever.
What "left" made these changes? Most were done by legislatures....These "changes" in Iowa (which is where I live and what I care about) were wildly successful......with hardly a problem......but yet "the legislature" felt it was necessary to reign in county auditors and their responsibilities because of "what might have happened" altho NONE of their fears were ever proven or prosecuted as happening.
Do you think that whatever the Iowa legislature does makes an iota of difference in Michigan? And again bandit......where is your proof that these things you allude to, ever occurred?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
Equity of outcomes is widely supported by democrats.
No. Your propaganda tells you that because there are a few out there talking about it. But it's not among the policy discussions being considered by Democrats. That's just another example of the far right making shit up.

I take it from your non-response that you are an advocate for turning away the sick and injured who don't have insurance. Makes sense that you would adopt that despicable stance.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FranCantCoach
Excellent piece.

the right has their crazies and this should give us all significant concern. But the way the democrat party has shifted so dramatically to the left is of bigger concern.

Lol, the gop takes the cake when it comes to crazy. The left has its fringe nuts, but they have no real sway. The gop is being run by the inmates.
Solar nails it. Here is what mainstream Republicans are now…

 
  • Like
Reactions: NewVicHawkeye
Yes, both parties promoted mail in ballots, but Republicans made it an art form. Again, it wasn’t until 2020 that the R party started bitching.
Well. Except in Florida when they bitched about it repeatedly starting decades ago. But other than that, yep, never complained about it. I, by the way, had these same get out the vote blue tactic complaints in the bush era when I lived in Chicago. This is nothing new. Just because trump bellyached about it doesn’t make it not an issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
It’s a horseshoe issue. I see myself as a classical liberal. That should be left wing. But, today, it’s not. Left proposes more and more central control. That authoritarian/freedom continuum to me defines left versus right. The more authoritarian the more leftwing the country.
Checks @Banditking ’s join date. Sees that it was late April when @NCHawk5 had his banhammer.

Probably just a big coincidence.
 
What "left" made these changes? Most were done by legislatures....These "changes" in Iowa (which is where I live and what I care about) were wildly successful......with hardly a problem......but yet "the legislature" felt it was necessary to reign in county auditors and their responsibilities because of "what might have happened" altho NONE of their fears were ever proven or prosecuted as happening.
Do you think that whatever the Iowa legislature does makes an iota of difference in Michigan? And again bandit......where is your proof that these things you allude to, ever occurred?
What things are you asking for proof about? Are you referencing the time magazine article reporting on what democrats said they did in the last election? You want proof they did what they said they did?

Think about it this way. There’s no proof that plumbers wouldn’t do just a good a job being your primary care physician than physicians. No proof that nurses wouldn’t do just a good job across specialities than physicians. But, we require there be standards. Those standards are in place to ensure public trust and to ensure competent practice of medicine. It doesn’t matter if there is proven fraud. The lax voting rules are not face valid relative to security. There’s not public trust. Keep up with the ballot harvesting and you’ll have no gop support for any dem won election moving forward.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
Republicans in Florida have encouraged mail in ballots for decades and have been damn successful at utilizing it. It’s only been since orange man couldn’t accept defeat that my party has started crying over it.

Hmm. Yes because some fraud here and there was always present. Like snowbirds who lived here for six months and then back up north the other six. Some registered to vote in both places and before states could (or would) “share and compare” it was easy to request an absentee ballot in one or both places.
So someone could vote twice in a Presidential election.
I’m not opposed to voting by mail or absentee voting but it’s become an opportunity for those who are so inclined to commit fraud. Notice I’m not pinning it on one party.
Voter fraud disenfranchises us all...
 
Hmm. Yes because some fraud here and there was always present. Like snowbirds who lived here for six months and then back up north the other six. Some registered to vote in both places and before states could (or would) “share and compare” it was easy to request an absentee ballot in one or both places.
So someone could vote twice in a Presidential election.
I’m not opposed to voting by mail or absentee voting but it’s become an opportunity for those who are so inclined to commit fraud. Notice I’m not pinning it on one party.
Voter fraud disenfranchises us all...
Yes, some fraud was always present, but it’s never been widespread like orange man and his band of merry idiots claimed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
Yes, some fraud was always present, but it’s never been widespread like orange man and his band of merry idiots claimed.
Perhaps not. But, the buckets of skewed dem votes after stopping counting in places like Atlanta aren’t a good look regardless of veracity. Whoever is on the losing side of that type of thing isn’t going to trust it. Appearances matter.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps not. But, the buckets of skewed dem votes after stopping counting in places like Atlanta aren’t a good look regardless of veracity. Whoever is on the losing side of that type of thing isn’t going to trust it. Appearances is matter.
Maybe the Republican leaders in those states should change their voting laws to allow counting as they go as they did in Florida. Nah, what am I talking about, that would be too easy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Banditking
Maybe the Republican leaders in those states should change their voting laws to allow counting as they go as they did in Florida. Nah, what am I talking about, that would be too easy.
That would be a step in the right direction. Should not be counting delays. Simplest approach though to me is in person voting with id. That’s the most secure method.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
Well. Except in Florida when they bitched about it repeatedly starting decades ago. But other than that, yep, never complained about it. I, by the way, had these same get out the vote blue tactic complaints in the bush era when I lived in Chicago. This is nothing new. Just because trump bellyached about it doesn’t make it not an issue.
They bitched about it so much that their elected officials, including republicans, decided to maintain and expand it. LOL.
 
Dude. I was asked to vote on hiring or not hiring a professional at work because he was a white male and if he was hired, they might lose the opportunity to hire a to be determined URM later. And, the white guy lost the vote! They were so brazen about it, it was done electronically. I’ve been to multiple professional society meetings in which part of the discussion was around changing laws and advocacy to treat unequally people based on race and gender representation to achieve equity of outcomes .
WTF? So what? You're spreading misinformation about the Democratic platform. You also don't give a shit if people suffer. Dude. SMFH
 
What things are you asking for proof about? Are you referencing the time magazine article reporting on what democrats said they did in the last election? You want proof they did what they said they did?

Think about it this way. There’s no proof that plumbers wouldn’t do just a good a job being your primary care physician than physicians. No proof that nurses wouldn’t do just a good job across specialities than physicians. But, we require there be standards. Those standards are in place to ensure public trust and to ensure competent practice of medicine. It doesn’t matter if there is proven fraud. The lax voting rules are not face valid relative to security. There’s not public trust. Keep up with the ballot harvesting and you’ll have no gop support for any dem won election moving forward.
You're completely off your rocker now. JFC.
 
Hmm. Yes because some fraud here and there was always present. Like snowbirds who lived here for six months and then back up north the other six. Some registered to vote in both places and before states could (or would) “share and compare” it was easy to request an absentee ballot in one or both places.
So someone could vote twice in a Presidential election.
I’m not opposed to voting by mail or absentee voting but it’s become an opportunity for those who are so inclined to commit fraud. Notice I’m not pinning it on one party.
Voter fraud disenfranchises us all...
Link to evidence of significant voter fraud?
 
Perhaps not. But, the buckets of skewed dem votes after stopping counting in places like Atlanta aren’t a good look regardless of veracity. Whoever is on the losing side of that type of thing isn’t going to trust it. Appearances matter.
You've bought the lies hook, line and sinker. What did you think of Trump asking the GA AG to "find" 11000 votes?
 
What things are you asking for proof about? Are you referencing the time magazine article reporting on what democrats said they did in the last election? You want proof they did what they said they did?

Think about it this way. There’s no proof that plumbers wouldn’t do just a good a job being your primary care physician than physicians. No proof that nurses wouldn’t do just a good job across specialities than physicians. But, we require there be standards. Those standards are in place to ensure public trust and to ensure competent practice of medicine. It doesn’t matter if there is proven fraud. The lax voting rules are not face valid relative to security. There’s not public trust. Keep up with the ballot harvesting and you’ll have no gop support for any dem won election moving forward.
What does this article have to do with Iowa? Because someone in another state might cheat....why does Iowa have to change its rules? Again, typical Republican law making......We have the solution......but where is the problem? And again...you complaining here is NOT founded on anything factual. Where is the beef?
 
WTF? So what? You're spreading misinformation about the Democratic platform. You also don't give a shit if people suffer. Dude. SMFH
Why is that misinformation? It’s real. Truth. I’ve spread no misinformation. That you don’t like it or that it’s inconvenient for your narrative is immaterial.
 
S
What does this article have to do with Iowa? Because someone in another state might cheat....why does Iowa have to change its rules? Again, typical Republican law making......We have the solution......but where is the problem? And again...you complaining here is NOT founded on anything factual. Where is the beef?
We are talking beyond Iowa.
 
Now you want me to do what exactly?
Nothing. Acknowledging that your stupid ass bans of me were based solely on politics would be nice, and it’s very clear. Stop banning people, especially those that pay whatever salary you have. Fairly simple. Stop over moderating.
 
Why is that misinformation? It’s real. Truth. I’ve spread no misinformation. That you don’t like it or that it’s inconvenient for your narrative is immaterial.
It's not. The only thing you mentioned that is part of the Democratic platform is universal healthcare. And you've demonstrated that you're against that because you don't give a shit about people suffering. That's part of the republican platform and is deplorable.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: binsfeldcyhawk2
Nothing. Acknowledging that your stupid ass bans of me were based solely on politics would be nice, and it’s very clear. Stop banning people, especially those that pay whatever salary you have. Fairly simple. Stop over moderating.
I’m an unpaid volunteer………

you, and others like you, are the only thing that keep me motivated to stay around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Banditking
But you are far more concerned about non-existent voter fraud than you are his attempts to overturn the 2020 election or those who support him.
I didn’t see the attempts to overturn the election as a serious threat. I do see ballot harvesting and mail in voting in the manner that Dems wish to implant as a serious threat. Also, I’d consider consider fraud more broadly in this light. I think the time magazine article highlights some of it. But, I see the Clinton funded misinformation and subsequent Russian investigation, the propping up of Michael Avenatti, blm George floyd riots and media and politician reactions and role, the kavanaugh situation, and more recently the dhs and Biden admin collaboration to moderate content in social media as perpetuating a narrative fraud, which has influenced voting.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT