You do realize Zuckerberg admitted doing this.I can't believe there are still hillbillies out there who think Facebook was, "censoring" them.
Lol.
You do realize Zuckerberg admitted doing this.I can't believe there are still hillbillies out there who think Facebook was, "censoring" them.
Lol.
It's his own platform. He can do whatever he wants.You do realize Zuckerberg admitted doing this.
You people are so dumb, or at least act like it. How can you possibly believe that a few people deciding what is and isn’t true is a better option than letting all people weigh in.This is funny to me.
In maga world, the best way to find truth and transparency is to eliminate those who verify facts.
Lol
What did I lose, and what did you presumably win, patriot?You people are so dumb, or at least act like it. How can you possibly believe that a few people deciding what is and isn’t true is a better option than letting all people weigh in.
We all know you don’t believe that, you simply want censorship. You lost, again 🤣
He sure can, so why deny you’re doing it, right?It's his own platform. He can do whatever he wants.
Still not censoring.
So you lack the ability to do that for yourself? Read, listen, think. Decide.What did I lose, and what did you presumably win, patriot?
To answer your question, I have higher standards than you as it relates to the content I consume on the Internet. I'd rather read material that has been verified instead of bullshit spewed by smelly rednecks. It's fun on an anonymous site like this Board, but as it relates to social media, I have higher standards.
It's why I've cancelled both Twitter and Facebook.
I'd love to hear your definition of censoring. I can't wait to hear how you try to spin this.It's his own platform. He can do whatever he wants.
Still not censoring.
Lol, goddammit you're an idiot. Who are your verified sources on the internet. I bet you love the view, Jimmy Fallon, and fauci.What did I lose, and what did you presumably win, patriot?
To answer your question, I have higher standards than you as it relates to the content I consume on the Internet. I'd rather read material that has been verified instead of bullshit spewed by smelly rednecks. It's fun on an anonymous site like this Board, but as it relates to social media, I have higher standards.
It's why I've cancelled both Twitter and Facebook.
Lou is off the mark as usual. It had nothing to do with fact checking and everything to do with the masses slurping up Chinese and Russian propaganda like it was an open bar.
When a company publicly comes out and says they will be discontinuing a practice, that means they've been doing the practice.
I suspect Meta is doing this because they know Trump's administration will sharing what the Biden administration was doing in influencing the media, particularly during COVID.
Lou is off the mark as usual. It had nothing to do with fact checking and everything to do with the masses slurping up Chinese and Russian propaganda like it was an open bar.
What point do you think you're making?So does censoring and "fact checking" discussion of Covid being a Chinese lab link, qualify as fighting Chinese propaganda?
Explain it exactly...censoring lab leak discussion was ANTI-Chinese propaganda? And discussing the lab leak was ADVANCING Chinese propaganda?
It's literally backwards. Please explain which was the Chinese propaganda, the lab leak theory or the wet market theory? Which side did the fact checkers and misinformation czars line up universally behind?
You guys just say stuff you don't even believe anymore LOL. Anything to avoid any reconsideration of past positions at all.
What point are you trying to make? There is evidence that the Biden administration and democrats have been using a major propaganda campaign through social media to push a certain agenda. You have been eating up the propaganda of the left and refuse to recognize that their propaganda is what led to Trump being re-elected. People have seen through the lies of the left and are fighting back. People are angry that the left went full retard and now we want to bring back some sanity. The left have created such a messed up backward system where Trump is now the sane one. That is on you.What point do you think you're making?
It's well documented that both russia and china are posting propaganda on both sides of all the hot issues. They don't care about spreading any particular story, they just want people angry. Angry enough to do stupid things not in their best interest.
The reason republicans are so opposed to stopping it is that their entire political strategy is based on the same thing. Look at trump this week - spouts insane nonsense and you all just gobble it up.
LMFAO. Asking social media platforms to throttle propaganda during a national crisis is not pushing propaganda.What point are you trying to make? There is evidence that the Biden administration and democrats have been using a major propaganda campaign through social media to push a certain agenda. You have been eating up the propaganda of the left and refuse to recognize that their propaganda is what led to Trump being re-elected. People have seen through the lies of the left and are fighting back. People are angry that the left went full retard and now we want to bring back some sanity. The left have created such a messed up backward system where Trump is now the sane one. That is on you.
Republicans believe in freedom of speech. Biden was clearly against freedom of speech considering what he was pushing. How do you rationalize Bidens propaganda campaign to get social media to censor opposing opinions even when they were from reputable sources?
By virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment, Government agencies and government officials are forbidden from regulating or restricting speech or other expression based on its content or viewpoint.I'd love to hear your definition of censoring. I can't wait to hear how you try to spin this.
This is straight out of the lefts playbook to deny what was happening until you can't deny it anymore, then just change the definition. You are not fooling anyone, but you do look like a fool.
Per Zuckerberg, Facebook was receiving significant pressure by the biden administration to CENSOR certain covid information.
You're so triggered.Lol, goddammit you're an idiot. Who are your verified sources on the internet. I bet you love the view, Jimmy Fallon, and fauci.
Because of what you said yesterday in the same thread (I believe same thread).He sure can, do why deny you’re doing it, right?
You just proved my point. The government cant restrict speech on their own. Instead, the coerced private companies to restrict speech. It is a very slippery slope. Zuckerberg admitted that the Biden administration was telling them to censor speech. This is exactly what republicans were upset about.By virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment, Government agencies and government officials are forbidden from regulating or restricting speech or other expression based on its content or viewpoint.
Non Government groups can publish whatever they want. Call it censorship. Call it banana cream pie. I don't really care.
Sorry your feelings are so hurt.
When MTG is regurgitating, verbatim, the propaganda posted on X by Russia, it's a problem.What point do you think you're making?
It's well documented that both russia and china are posting propaganda on both sides of all the hot issues. They don't care about spreading any particular story, they just want people angry. Angry enough to do stupid things not in their best interest.
The reason republicans are so opposed to stopping it is that their entire political strategy is based on the same thing. Look at trump this week - spouts insane nonsense and you all just gobble it up.
Can the govt prevent people from yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater?You just proved my point. The government cant restrict speech on their own. Instead, the coerced private companies to restrict speech. It is a very slippery slope. Zuckerberg admitted that the Biden administration was telling them to censor speech. This is exactly what republicans were upset about.
So with your example, the process worked, right?You just proved my point. The government cant restrict speech on their own. Instead, the coerced private companies to restrict speech. It is a very slippery slope. Zuckerberg admitted that the Biden administration was telling them to censor speech. This is exactly what republicans were upset about.
If you want to educate yourself about the censorship, I have provided some documents for you.By virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment, Government agencies and government officials are forbidden from regulating or restricting speech or other expression based on its content or viewpoint.
Non Government groups can publish whatever they want. Call it censorship. Call it banana cream pie. I don't really care.
Sorry your feelings are so hurt.
Right wing propaganda from a partisan group of politicians.If you want to educate yourself about the censorship, I have provided some documents for you.
"This interim report details the months long campaign by the Biden White House to coerce
large companies, namely Meta (parent company of Facebook), Alphabet (parent company of
YouTube), and Amazon, to censor books, videos, posts, and other content online. By the end of
2021, Facebook, YouTube, and Amazon changed their content moderation policies in ways that
were directly responsive to criticism from the Biden Administration.
While the Biden White House’s pressure campaign largely succeeded, its effects were
devastating. By suppressing free speech and intentionally distorting public debate in the modern
town square, ideas and policies were no longer fairly tested and debated on their merits. Instead,
policymakers implemented a series of public health measures that proved to be disastrous for the
country. From unnecessary extended school closures to unconstitutional vaccine mandates that
forced workers to take a newly developed vaccine or risk losing their jobs, the Biden
Administration and other officials needlessly imposed harm and suffering on Americans across
the country."
- Big Tech changed their content moderation policies because of the Biden White House
- The Biden White House's censorship targeted true information, satire, and other content that did not violate the platforms' policies
- The Biden White House's censorship campaign had a chilling effect on other speech
- The White House had leverage because the companies had other policy concerns involving the Biden Administration
- The Biden White House pushed censorship of books, not just social media
Weaponization Committee Exposes the Biden White House Censorship Regime in New Report
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the House Judiciary Committee and its Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government released an interim staff report titled, "The Censorship-Industrial Complexjudiciary.house.gov
Good idea, one thing that always brings more people to your way of thinking is to call them names.I can't believe there are still hillbillies out there who think Facebook was, "censoring" them.
Lol.
I'll never convince anyone on this platform to change their mind.Good idea, one thing that always brings more people to your way of thinking is to call them names.
I can't believe there are still hillbillies out there who think Facebook was, "censoring" them.
Lol.
You do you.Definition of ignorant and proud of it.
The US government has a lot of leverage to get private companies to do what they want. I linked the House Weaponization report in the post above so you can educate yourself. I don't know the exact legality of what the Biden administration did, but I assume this will be litigated over the next few years.Can the govt prevent people from yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater?
you did everything but answer the question.The US government has a lot of leverage to get private companies to do what they want. I linked the House Weaponization report in the post above so you can educate yourself. I don't know the exact legality of what the Biden administration did, but I assume this will be litigated over the next few years.
What we know as fact is that the Biden admin was telling social media companies to censor certain information. We could argue whether this was legal or not, but I hope everyone can see that it is a slippery slope at a minimum.
Kind of like the J6 committee, amirite?Right wing propaganda from a partisan group of politicians.
Lol.
Be better.
Definition of ignorant and proud of it.
Who was yelling fire in a theater? Give some context to your question and I will answer it.you did everything but answer the question.
So does censoring and "fact checking" discussion of Covid being a Chinese lab link, qualify as fighting Chinese propaganda?
Explain it exactly...censoring lab leak discussion was ANTI-Chinese propaganda? And discussing the lab leak was ADVANCING Chinese propaganda?
It's literally backwards. Please explain which was the Chinese propaganda, the lab leak theory or the wet market theory? Which side did the fact checkers and misinformation czars line up universally behind?
You guys just say stuff you don't even believe anymore LOL. Anything to avoid any reconsideration of past positions at all.
Show me where I cited them as a source the same way you did, patriot.Kind of like the J6 committee, amirite?
LMFAO. Asking social media platforms to throttle propaganda during a national crisis is not pushing propaganda.
The only freedom of speech you all are for is the freedom to spread any lie you find soothing.
It's not a complicated question. Is it illegal censorship to prevent people from yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater.Who was yelling fire in a theater? Give some context to your question and I will answer it.
J6 happened and is a fact. Even the VP at the time of J6 won't defend the insurrection. You might not want to use J6 in your argument, it just makes you look really ignorant and a traitor.Kind of like the J6 committee, amirite?
Are you that naive to believe the Biden administration was the first, or will be the last, to make similar request to social media companies?The US government has a lot of leverage to get private companies to do what they want. I linked the House Weaponization report in the post above so you can educate yourself. I don't know the exact legality of what the Biden administration did, but I assume this will be litigated over the next few years.
What we know as fact is that the Biden admin was telling social media companies to censor certain information. We could argue whether this was legal or not, but I hope everyone can see that it is a slippery slope at a minimum.