Again, he's being accused of sexual assault and the dems are trashing him. We know you'd prefer he just sit there and take it but not everyone reacts that way. I didnt much care for the way he came off but given the situation, it shouldn't preclude him from anything. He's immensely qualified.
Did you miss the whole part of his opening remarks where he brought up the far right wing conspiracy that his hold up to being on the SCOTUS was do to the Clintons? That's pretty damn extreme, dude.
Nobody expects anyone in that situation to just take it. What we expect is for him to rationally defend himself instead of throwing out OIT worthy conspiracy theories on the Clintons setting him up.
Well there was some reason Mitch McConnell thought he was a bad choice and tried to talk Trump out of it. Mitch knew there would be problems.
Meh, it would be different of he acted this way during the initial week long round of questioning and he didn't. He got testy after being called a raper and I don't much blame him.
By some accounts, yeah which are being shown by the day to have all been bs. Being accused of being an awful human being doesn't make it so, especially when the accusers are lying!
It's convenient that you ignore all the people who support the stories of the accusers and ignore all his blatant lies.
Accusers, plural? Are you still considering rameriz and swetnik as actual remotely credible? Bc they aren't. The facts don't support them at all.
No, I believe in context and scope of dishonesty. Lying about drilling an intern in the oval is different than lying about what boofing means. Please don't try to suggest differently.
