You're referring to Trump and Musk, correct?
Federal judge blocks dismantling of USAID, saying it "likely violated" the Constitution
- Thread starter noStemsnoSTICKS
- Start date
Umm, the part you highlighted about courts..is referring to appointing people for congress' approval.
So is it time for Magats to return to pre-January 2025 where they'd never heard of USAID before?
I’m so upset about this Harry Sisson thing I can’t see straight.
Maggots love to claim, "corruption," then fall short when asked to define the corruption they purport to exist.
Every. Single. Time.
Every. Single. Time.
Better read “Marbury v. Madison” PF…
Yeah, those two are the only ones in Washington trying to do anything. Unfortunately they don't have a lot of power in the party so saying something is about all they can do. Still, that's more than the people in charge. You have Walz and Pritzger and besides those two....nothing.
hawkeyetraveler
HB Heisman
What is so weird about @Phenomenally Frantastic is he was one of the most anti Trump posters on here back in his first term. Only after Musk saw the opportunity to take advantage of gullible MAGAs did he decide to convert. But he was in the first wave of gullible Muskies, so maybe he just figured it was easier to assimilate completely? Hard to say, but the dude is disturbed and lacks even a 7th grade understanding of how our government works.
Thats what happens when you drink the kool-ade, ya go batshit crazy.
“Rogue judges are subverting the will of the American people in their attempts to stop President Trump from carrying out his agenda,”
"likely violated the Constitution"... the typical Bonespurs way. Rico... are you still supporting the guy found to be a confirmed sexual abuser?? You still doing that despicable deed yourself?? Quite embarassing for you to be in such a tenuous position... oh well... birds of a feather. 😩 so sad.
It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.
There goes Rico again, loves to post the pictures of random men and boys on the internet. Fits right in with his history of sexual abuser. It appears that's all you do all day... post pictures of men and boys on the internet. So sickening. So sad.LOL - Likely will turn out to be he "didn't".
Always projection. Every accusation is a confession, it's incredible how often it's true.
You do understand that this judicial review power allows the Supreme Court to invalidate or declare unconstitutional actions or laws created by levels of government and not some Activist District Court Judge.
This is why I suspect his account has been taken over by a GRU operative, or someone being paid by them. He also never says anything bad about Putin. He really does give off Nat Algren vibes.
Rico... are you still posting pictures of men and little boys around the internet? Hope not, that's pretty disgusting behavior.
Judicial review isn’t limited to any specific level. How would the Supreme Court rule on a case if it doesn’t have original jurisdiction?
Agreed, so don't act like it's over because some out-of-control Activist Judges make rulings.
You seem confused. SCOTUS will have final say, it’s trump that says the courts don’t have the power to hear these cases.
LOL - I cited a Newt meme and you have inserted Trump into the conversation. You're the confused one.
Do you understand that the courts have the ability to review cases and controversies?
My bad, I assumed you were interested in discussing the merits of this topic. Since neither you, trump nor newt understand the concept of judicial review it’s not worth continuing. Perhaps you can post about some crime in Omaha instead. Bye.
I understand the concept of judicial review, I also stand by my belief that Activist Judges need to be removed from the bench.
It’s amazing just when I think I’ve got a handle on how fvcking stupid you are, you somehow dig deeper. Almost every Supreme Court decision IN HISTORY started its life in a lower court, moran. And how do those lower courts make their constitutional calls? By referring to precedents established by who? What court’s decisions inform the lower courts when they deal with constitutional questions? C’mon idiot…just shout it out.
Damn @Phenomenally Frantastic , it’s like you know you lied when you posted that horseshit meme. Still waiting on your response.
Last edited:
Your comprehension skills are lacking, my message implied the Supreme Court will have the final say in these matters not some Activist Judges whom I believe need to be weeded out.
I don't even have to bait the hook for many of you to bite.
I'm sure he's frantically searching his favorite tweeters looking for an answer to copy and paste.
Similar threads
