ADVERTISEMENT

For $1.5M, Penn St QB Beau Pribula has Committed to Missouri after Visiting IOWA Wed, Dec 18. Will Iowa add a 6th QB to the Roster?

Agree. I'm looking forward to the Music City Bowl to see if we get the Sullivan from Wisconsin or the UCLA game. I tend to believe we'll see more of a Wisconsin level performance. I'll feel a lot better about next fall if he plays well in the bowl game.
That UCLA game wasn't all on Sully. He had the 2 ints, but he also passed for 157 yards on just 9 attempts for a 17.5 YPA. He threw some really beautiful balls. On the fumble he had the ball high and tight with both arms but the defender just got his arm in there and wrenched it away. If you could fault him in that game it was probably just trying to do too much.
 
Last edited:
That UCLA game wasn't all on Sully. He had the 2 ints, but he also passed for 157 yards on just 9 attempts for a 17.5 YPA. He threw some really beautiful balls. On the fumble he had the ball high and tight with both arms but the defender just got his arm in there and wrenched it away. I'd you could fault him in that game it was probably just trying to do too much.
I’m convinced that Sully was injured prior to any of those turnovers.
 
That UCLA game wasn't all on Sully. He had the 2 ints, but he also passed for 157 yards on just 9 attempts for a 17.5 YPA. He threw some really beautiful balls. On the fumble he had the ball high and tight with both arms but the defender just got his arm in there and wrenched it away. I'd you could fault him in that game it was probably just trying to do too much.
Sullivan sounds like a hard worker and a very coachable guy. Like Kirk said about Brown today he brings to the table what Lester wants in a quarterback. I expect him to make a strong run for the starter job in the spring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mohawkeye
It appears to me from looking at the QB situatuation over the past several years (post-Stanley) that Iowa has a classic "chicken & egg" situation re: skill players, not just QBs.

So, it seems that we are pretty unlikely to land a Pribula-level QB but we really do need to have Sully have a good (not necessarily great) year next year in 2025 to PROVE to recruits/transfers that Iowa CAN do it offensively. I do not believe we are at that point yet; hence, the "chicken & egg" situation; i.e., We have to prove we know what we are doing offensively in order to attract top talent, and it is difficult to do well offensively without top talent.

Re: Pribula, from reading these posts, it seems as though if he wants to go to place to showcase his skills, Iowa is probably at the bottom of the list. But if his priority is early playing time, Iowa has to be at or near the top of the list. I do not know what is priorities are, and, frankly, neither do any of you guys.

As alluded to above, if Sully can have a good/great 2025, maybe by this time next year we can get a Pribula-level QB in the portal or from recruiting, but we are just not there yet. I just wish KF would admit his shortcomings regarding QB development and keep his hands off it and delegate that task to Lester.
 
That UCLA game wasn't all on Sully. He had the 2 ints, but he also passed for 157 yards on just 9 attempts for a 17.5 YPA. He threw some really beautiful balls. On the fumble he had the ball high and tight with both arms but the defender just got his arm in there and wrenched it away. I'd you could fault him in that game it was probably just trying to do too much.
That is what was so confounding about that game. He started out so great, but that first pick and then the strip fumble just seemed so out of character for him based on what we had seen from him in the prior games. As I said above, I do think he’ll be more like what we saw against Wisconsin.

Plus, as has been discussed many times over, the defense was not sharp that night. UCLA could have had a lot more points than the 20 they tallied.
 
It appears to me from looking at the QB situatuation over the past several years (post-Stanley) that Iowa has a classic "chicken & egg" situation re: skill players, not just QBs.

So, it seems that we are pretty unlikely to land a Pribula-level QB but we really do need to have Sully have a good (not necessarily great) year next year in 2025 to PROVE to recruits/transfers that Iowa CAN do it offensively. I do not believe we are at that point yet; hence, the "chicken & egg" situation; i.e., We have to prove we know what we are doing offensively in order to attract top talent, and it is difficult to do well offensively without top talent.

Re: Pribula, from reading these posts, it seems as though if he wants to go to place to showcase his skills, Iowa is probably at the bottom of the list. But if his priority is early playing time, Iowa has to be at or near the top of the list. I do not know what is priorities are, and, frankly, neither do any of you guys.

As alluded to above, if Sully can have a good/great 2025, maybe by this time next year we can get a Pribula-level QB in the portal or from recruiting, but we are just not there yet. I just wish KF would admit his shortcomings regarding QB development and keep his hands off it and delegate that task to Lester.
Keep in mind we have a commitment from Cash Herrera a very good get from CA for the 26 class. He had an offer from UCLA so we beat out a home state Big Ten school for him. Recruits who meet Lester and learn about the offense he wants to build come away with a more positive impression than some of us do as fans looking at it from the outside.
 
That is what was so confounding about that game. He started out so great, but that first pick and then the strip fumble just seemed so out of character for him based on what we had seen from him in the prior games. As I said above, I do think he’ll be more like what we saw against Wisconsin.

Plus, as has been discussed many times over, the defense was not sharp that night. UCLA could have had a lot more points than the 20 they tallied.
But they didn't. And that's the beauty of Phil Parker's defense. He seldom makes it easy to score points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeyemark18
Keep in mind we have a commitment from Cash Herrera a very good get from CA for the 26 class. He had an offer from UCLA so we beat out a home state Big Ten school for him. Recruits who meet Lester and learn about the offense he wants to build come away with a more positive impression than some of us do as fans looking at it from the outside.
Didn't CH decommit?
 
But they didn't. And that's the beauty of Phil Parker's defense. He seldom makes it easy to score points.

I’ll give you that they didn’t score a lot of points, and sure Iowa can be commended for intercepting a ball thrown from the 5 yard line and causing a fumble at the 1 yard line. But UCLA moved the ball and kept it out of Iowa’s hands, a lot. Add a missed FG in the third quarter. Then the last 11:30 of the game, Iowa had the ball for 1:00 and UCLA ran out the last 4:00 minutes of the clock on Iowa. Iowa’s defense was not sharp that game. They just weren’t. It happens.
 
Until Iowa can significantly upgrade the OL and add 1-2 playmakers at WR, I don’t see the QB mattering much. If those two things don’t change, then you might as well just find a quarterback who can throw 3-yard outs and run for his life.
It matters. It matters a lot.

Iowa didn’t switch their OL when Sullivan came in against NW…
 
Sully has not been that impressive. Our baseline has been too low.
Exactly.

We all gushed for Sully cause he could scramble which helped extend drives and it took some pressure off of KJ

But it’s not like he also threw for 250+ yards

We have NO idea what we have from our QBs. And we have no idea how well Lester can develop. Cade was barely above Deacon levels of effectiveness
 
Yeah. It's all about expectations. Sully is a capable QB, but the baseline for fan expectations of offense at Iowa is now worst in the country and see anything better than completely broken as a big win. Iowa scores 19 points in a 1 point loss and fans are asking what's wrong with the defense. Fans were raving about how well the offense was performing and how the defense had taken a big step back. With an All American tailback the offense was ranked 119th in total yards and 132nd in passing offense. They fared better on the scoring metric with 62nd but failed to score 21 points in 5 games.

The defense on the other hand was 13th in points allowed and only .5 out of the top 10 and tied with Oregon. Yards per game wasn't as good but still ranked a very respectable 23rd in the nation.

Iowa can still compete with the best teams in the country from a defensive perspective. They still have a mountain to climb offensively and expecting that to happen with just an okay QB and a dearth of receiving talent to go along with an average oline isn't going to get them there.
Kirk has conditioned most of the fan base to accept that offense is really important. Punting is winning!!

So now if the defense or special teams make any mistakes, or see any minor drop in efficiency….we scream for Parker’s head
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thunderlips71
Until Iowa can significantly upgrade the OL and add 1-2 playmakers at WR, I don’t see the QB mattering much. If those two things don’t change, then you might as well just find a quarterback who can throw 3-yard outs and run for his life.
The OL had a great year, they can only block five people at a time though. When teams are able to stack the box and bring six or seven it doesn't matter how good the OL is.

In 2024 Iowa ranked 22nd in sacks given up at only 15 total. In 2023 Iowa was ranked 100th giving up 32 so there was a huge improvement. This notion that the OL was shitty at pass blocking is false.
 
The OL had a great year, they can only block five people at a time though. When teams are able to stack the box and bring six or seven it doesn't matter how good the OL is.

In 2024 Iowa ranked 22nd in sacks given up at only 15 total. In 2023 Iowa was ranked 100th giving up 32 so there was a huge improvement. This notion that the OL was shitty at pass blocking is false.
How many pass attempts has to factor in on sack numbers
 
Until Iowa can significantly upgrade the OL and add 1-2 playmakers at WR, I don’t see the QB mattering much. If those two things don’t change, then you might as well just find a quarterback who can throw 3-yard outs and run for his life.
I really don't know what you want from our OL. Two first team all-BIG selections, a second team and one honorable mention. OL was a semifinalist for the Joe Moore award. WR is still an issue but I did see our young guys do a few good things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torg and yrunvs
I really don't know what you want from our OL. Two first team all-BIG selections, a second team and one honorable mention. OL was a semifinalist for the Joe Moore award. WR is still an issue but I did see our young guys do a few good things.
They are probably better than what I think. In fairness, I didn’t watch Iowa much after Minnesota, so I probably shouldn’t critique. My issue was they had a lot of experience and still seemed to struggle as a unit at times.
 
I’d say after spring ball whatever number of QB’s Iowa has on roster at least 50% of them will enter the transfer portal. It’ll be an open competition for the QB1/QB2 spot with Lester running the show.
 
I’d say after spring ball whatever number of QB’s Iowa has on roster at least 50% of them will enter the transfer portal. It’ll be an open competition for the QB1/QB2 spot with Lester running the show.

Story from the Register.

The current QB Room has 3 on scholarship with 2 preferred walk ons.

A walk on could be cut to get to the 105 roster limit.




 
I don’t see any issue carrying 5 qb’s with a 105 man limit. That still allows you 4-5 guys at every other position.

But if you can get Pribula, or another guy that you feel can step in and improve the play on the field, you take him and if a guy wants to jump than that’s his choice. It’s certainly not something that should prohibit Iowa from taking an upgrade.
 
Story from the Register.

The current QB Room has 3 on scholarship with 2 preferred walk ons.

A walk on could be cut to get to the 105 roster limit.








No way Iowa has fewer than five QBs on the roster next season, especially with two of them being true freshmen. If Iowa brings in another portal QB, Stratton will enter the portal in the spring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkhawk
I don’t see any issue carrying 5 qb’s with a 105 man limit. That still allows you 4-5 guys at every other position.

But if you can get Pribula, or another guy that you feel can step in and improve the play on the field, you take him and if a guy wants to jump than that’s his choice. It’s certainly not something that should prohibit Iowa from taking an upgrade.


KF made it pretty clear yesterday that if they can add another QB (that's an upgrade) they will do it.

He also said that the 105 roster limit makes things hard because the staff has had difficult discursions with players that they could get cut by the Aug 1 deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rambler Hawk
Unfortunately it’s looking like Ole Miss, his agent(brother) is only following one coach from any of the teams on his list, Kiffin… if he’s foolish enough to play for frost or Kiffin we don’t want him.
He did go play for James Franklin…so not sure you can be surprised
 
  • Like
Reactions: ICHawk2440
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT