No, we think people should have more power than States. Its so fun seeing cons backing government bureaucracy over civil rights. You folks are so lost, you don't stand for anything anymore.
You have provided no evidence of this. In fact you were asked to think for yourself and provide a rationale for the EC and have failed. Therefore, all evidence in this thread would indicate you are not able to think for yourself.
No, because you have no idea what the FF were trying to accomplish, let alone if they accomplished it with the EC. You are just being a founding father fluffer. There is literally no independent thought from you on this topic.
You aren't too bright.
I'm not disputing your point that a vote in Wyoming carries more weight than a vote in California. But by my calculations the ratio in the 2016 election was 3.023 to 1. I'm curious to know how you arrived at a figure of more than 3.5.
Even better to do it based on actual votes cast, which is how I based it. An eligible voter who doesn't participate doesn't count no matter how you elect the president.
An eligible voter can participate if they choose do. Prior to an election, you won't know for sure who will vote. Therefore, it needs to be based upon eligible voters for that state.
So, you are telling me that going into an election, you can tell who will vote and who won't?
If they ever change the presidential election to popular vote then the winner will be the candidate who receives the most votes that were actually cast. If someone is eligible to vote but doesn't bother to vote then they don't factor into the election results.
That's not what I said at all. It really gets old having to spend so much time correcting reading comprehension failures.
That's not what I said at all. It really gets old having to spend so much time correcting reading comprehension failures.
