yikes, we were out there in March and I could find anything cheaper than $4.39 a gallon
Whats great is its being done for environmental reasons.yikes, we were out there in March and I could find anything cheaper than $4.39 a gallon
$2.84 in Kentucky$2.88 in Iowa
This.I figured it was taxes to fund their trillion dollar unfunded obligations.
Why would the closure of 2 in-state refineries cause huge increases in CA alone?yikes, we were out there in March and I could find anything cheaper than $4.39 a gallon
Why would the closure of 2 in-state refineries cause huge increases in CA alone?
Don't gas stations in CA compete in national and global markets?
A tax difference between CA and some other states would account for a price increase at the pump, but a shift in suppliers shouldn't have that big of an effect.
What am I missing? Because if I'm not missing something, this guy's wingnut rant fails Econ 101.
yikes, we were out there in March and I could find anything cheaper than $4.39 a gallon
2.69 would be betterIn to say I was pleasantly surprised to pay $2.68 in Nebraska yesterday.
Yes… special anti-pollution fuels cost $$… Californians feel the added expense is worth it. Folks living in “the Valley” of Az. pay an additional .50/gallon for special anti-pollution blend gasolines too. Pollution is a very real problem in some areas of America..Blame Democrats.
Thanks. That sounds like a relevant point.US refinery output doesn't cross back and forth over the Rockies,.. California exists pretty much as a gasoline island.
Here's the report.Why would the closure of 2 in-state refineries cause huge increases in CA alone?
Don't gas stations in CA compete in national and global markets?
A tax difference between CA and some other states would account for a price increase at the pump, but a shift in suppliers shouldn't have that big of an effect.
What am I missing? Because if I'm not missing something, this guy's wingnut rant fails Econ 101.
Sure, but you were still in NebraskaIn to say I was pleasantly surprised to pay $2.68 in Nebraska yesterday.
AAU Basketball. Forced to cross the river. Working from home has it perks. I no longer have to commute into Omaha daily. 23 years of my life making that 90 minute round trip.Sure, but you were still in Nebraska
Sure. Ever been to an oil refinery? I have. They are filthy. They can be slightly less filthy, but that eats into profits. This is a dance to gain concessions from Newsom, who the oil companies know is running for president in 2028, and is anxious to cut a deal. Long term companies might be looking at lower demand as renewables and EVs take hold. You might want to take what Vincent Fong says with a grain of salt, too. He isn't an honest broker.Californians are still going to use 38 million gallons of gasoline every day. Now it will just be refined somewhere else. Which means the finished product will have to be transported to California. But the refinery mess will be in someone else’s backyard. And of course fewer refineries and additional transportation costs means the price goes up for everyone.
But Californians will be able to feel a little more superior about themselves. So it’s kind of a lose/win/lose/win situation.
have you been out there?Good thing that cars in California run on sunshine...
$1.98 on the WH lawn and Tesla Auto Mall.$2.88 in Iowa
This has been going on for about 20 years. The big three have been purchasing independent refineries and then shutting them down. We're just seeing the end result of a monopoly. It's clearly collusion and has been going on for decades. Every new governor says he'll look into it and then nothing happens.Why would the closure of 2 in-state refineries cause huge increases in CA alone?
Don't gas stations in CA compete in national and global markets?
A tax difference between CA and some other states would account for a price increase at the pump, but a shift in suppliers shouldn't have that big of an effect.
What am I missing? Because if I'm not missing something, this guy's wingnut rant fails Econ 101.
FIFY$1.98 on the WH lawn and Tesler Auto Mall.
Thanks.
Ya damn right it does.This pleases MAGA immensely
That's your excuse for everything.Blame Democrats.
yikes, we were out there in March and I could find anything cheaper than $4.39 a gallon
Thanks and I just found out there are 42 gallons of beer in a barrel.
If I recall from my bartending days it worked out to about 28 pitchers in a keg.Thanks and I just found out there are 42 gallons of beer in a barrel.
Actually, I'm just glad this is a problem unique to California and isn't impacting the sane states.This pleases MAGA immensely
Forty-two gallons of beer on the wall....forty-two gallons of beer.Thanks and I just found out there are 42 gallons of beer in a barrel.
Mine do! 100% powered by my solar panels!Good thing that cars in California run on sunshine...
Blame Democrats.
You’ve missed my point once again.Sure. Ever been to an oil refinery? I have. They are filthy. They can be slightly less filthy, but that eats into profits. This is a dance to gain concessions from Newsom, who the oil companies know is running for president in 2028, and is anxious to cut a deal. Long term companies might be looking at lower demand as renewables and EVs take hold. You might want to take what Vincent Fong says with a grain of salt, too. He isn't an honest broker.
Things aren't great air quality wise all the time, but you are old enough to remember how bad things could get in places like LA and Phoenix. Higher refinery costs are partially responsible for better air quality.