Actually, no. What happens is that you refuse to discuss the point I make. Then you declare victory and disappear until the next time, when you do the same thing. Rinse and repeat.
And now, it seems, you are dismissing Hanson, Ehrlich, the Pentagon, the IPCC as know-nothings like Algore. Tell me: Are these reliable sources or not?
What's happened, Joe, time and again, is that the alarmists have made exaggerated claims that didn't come to pass. Whether they did so out of ignorance, or intentionally because they thought it was necessary to provoke action, I do not know. I suspect it was some of both, depending upon the circumstance.
I do not know to what extent human activity affects the climate, nor do I know how the climate is going to change or what the results of that change will be. I lack the knowledge and training to make a rational assessment of those things.
I am, however, qualified to pass judgment on the track record of the more visible spokesmen for the movement, and that track record is not one that inspires confidence.