ADVERTISEMENT

Gov. Reynolds: Steve King must decide if his comments represent 'values' of Iowa 4th District

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,937
113
Distancing herself from fellow Republican Steve King, Gov. Kim Reynolds on Tuesday said the outspoken congressman should consider whether his rhetoric and actions represent the “values” of his district.

“Steve King needs to make a decision if he wants to represent the people and the values of the 4th District or do something else, and I think he needs to just take a look at that,” Reynolds told reporters.

Reynolds, who narrowly defeated Democrat Fred Hubbell for her first four-year term as governor Tuesday, was repeatedly asked about King in the closing days of the contest.

Hubbell called repeatedly for Reynolds to remove King as a co-chairman of her campaign, citing his anti-immigrant statements and support for white nationalist politicians.

Her remarks Tuesday came during her first news conference since the Nov. 6 election, when a reporter asked about the thoughts on the increased controversy surrounding King.

At the press gathering in Ottumwa, Reynolds said she hasn’t spoken directly with King since the election and she doesn’t have any plans to meet with him in the near future, saying she is currently busy preparing the new state budget.

King beat Democrat J.D. Scholten, 50 percent to 47 percent, by far the closest margin of victory in his nine previous elections in the most Republican of Iowa’s congressional districts.

In the final two weeks of the campaign, King weathered a series of criticisms for his support of a white nationalist candidate for Toronto mayor and his meeting with a member of an Austrian political party with historic ties to the Nazi Party.

In an interview with Radio Iowa in Ottumwa on Tuesday, Reynolds said of King’s close call in the election, “I think this would be a pretty good confirmation from his constituents that they would like to see more of him.”

At his postelection victory party, King blasted his critics and the “onslaught of an attempt to Kavanaugh-ize me ... like this state has never seen and like maybe America has never seen.”

Scholten, a former professional baseball player and paralegal also penned an op-ed in USA Today on Tuesday in which he assessed his near miss against King in a district with 70,000 more registered Republican voters than registered Democrats.

“So why does Steve King get re-elected?” Scholten said in the op-ed. “The best I can sum it up is that it’s a numbers game, combined with the way the media works in small towns and the increasingly urban-centric Democratic Party leaving districts like this one behind.”

Scholten suggested that in the many small-town newspapers that serve the 39-county district, King “doesn’t create the same headlines that he does nationally.”

“Some of the national headlines break through,” he wrote. “But for the most part, if you are a farmer on your combine listening to talk radio and getting reports about record low soybean prices, your congressman meeting with neo-Nazis or tweeting in support of a Toronto mayoral candidate who is a white nationalist just seems far away from day-to-day life.”

Scholten, who has not ruled out another run, begins a two-day “thank you tour” of five cities in the district on Wednesday.

https://www.thegazette.com/subject/...epresent-values-of-iowa-4th-district-20181113
 
Scholten makes two good points but for the other side. The national media over sensationalizes the news and its not in touch with what is actually going on locally in rural areas. I think the truth about King is somewhere in the middle and he's no longer a valid candidate because of some questionable things. But many locals probably see him much differently than those nationally because of big media.

The second is soybean prices. Farmers aren't hurting because of them directly. They're hurting from poor financial decision. New tractors, combines, and $10,000 plus an acre land purchases put some of them in this situation. I have a friend that farms 4,000 acres. They aren't hurting but they also didn't buy the newest machines or expensive land. They did the math back when farming was booming and it would take 20 years of those same prices or better for $10,000 an acre to pay off. They knew that wouldn't happen. There's a farmer here in town that had 20,000 acres and lost almost everything because of poor financial planning. The smart farmers aren't hurting.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT