I know the dems here keep saying that the cons are handing the election to Hillary. However, if you look at the most recent polls that just isn't the case. Sanders fares much better against the Republicans than Hillary does. I think there are 2 factors that could determine the next election.
1. Hillary doesn't excite the base like Obama did so getting as many Democrats out to vote may be tougher than the last 2 elections.
2. There is a HUGE section of people who are going to vote against Hillary. I am one of those and I haven't voted Republican since GWB the first time.
I guess it will come down to how many people won't vote for either Trump or Clinton no matter what. If Trump really is the nominee, that number will be very high.
I haven't voted for a Republican for President since Papa Bush's first election but I would vote for Trump over Hillary. I will not support her.I guess it will come down to how many people won't vote for either Trump or Clinton no matter what. If Trump really is the nominee, that number will be very high.
I don't think Hillary will pick Jim Jordan.Who will be the next vice president of the United States?
Why did she keep the emails for 2 years after she left office?
Why did it take so long for her to produce the emails to the Benghazi committee?
The State Department has to go through them to determine if there is anything classified that needs redacted.
The fact that there were SCI level emails found was already known though.The State Department has to go through them to determine if there is anything classified that needs redacted.
She needs to answer the question as to why she's such a rotten c_nt.
Can't disagree there. her initials are HRC.
Who will be the next vice president of the United States?
Rocket- I've had the same experience with die hard dems.there is even a dem politician friend of mine who wouldn't vote for here.she is such a liar.
[1] I agree. Selection of VP needs to address this.I know the dems here keep saying that the cons are handing the election to Hillary. However, if you look at the most recent polls that just isn't the case. Sanders fares much better against the Republicans than Hillary does. I think there are 2 factors that could determine the next election.
1. Hillary doesn't excite the base like Obama did so getting as many Democrats out to vote may be tougher than the last 2 elections.
2. There is a HUGE section of people who are going to vote against Hillary. I am one of those and I haven't voted Republican since GWB the first time.
Email accounts are considered "arms" so the use of a private email server is constitutionally protected.I've always wondered who it was that gave her permission to use the unusual and unprecedented email setup.![]()
Again, why not a 3rd party candidate?I haven't voted for a Republican for President since Papa Bush's first election but I would vote for Trump over Hillary. I will not support her.
[1] I agree. Selection of VP needs to address this.
[2] Why vote GOP just because you don't like Hillary? Why not vote Libertarian or some other 3rd party>
Her Royal C^ntnessCan't disagree there. her initials are HRC.
You are definitely correct about the system being stacked against outsiders. But, again, if we won't vote 3rd party when so many people don't like the front runners, we may just as well roll over and give up.People who don't like Hilary aren't going to throw away their votes to someone who can't possibly beat her. Now if we ever had a truly competitive three-way race, that dynamic could come into play, but the system is stacked against independent or minor party candidates.
Ross Perot was considered a formidable third-party candidate even though he received less than 20 percent of the vote and no electoral college votes.
People who don't like Hilary aren't going to throw away their votes to someone who can't possibly beat her. Now if we ever had a truly competitive three-way race, that dynamic could come into play, but the system is stacked against independent or minor party candidates.
Ross Perot was considered a formidable third-party candidate even though he received less than 20 percent of the vote and no electoral college votes.
And on the other side of the spectrum...There are many GOPers and political experts out there saying......"When's the inaguaration?"
The GOP and this committee gained nothing from yesterday...except make Hillary look pretty damned smart.
Not really.She is a tired old women who has no soul!
She knew they were lying about the video and she looked those family members in the eyes and told them the video caused it! Rights as the bodies were being unloaded from the plane.
Lots of people have been hurting for 30+ years now because of the flow of jobs from the USA abroad. "swiftboating" is a long revered tradition of GOP politics. You underestimate the strength of Hillary. That is a mistake. Even a patisan like Jow Scarborogh is scratching his head this AM wondering what the committee is all about. Make no mistake....Thursday was a HUGE day for Hillary. It was not a good day for Mr. Gowdy and his committee.In your eyes Joel. Because you have no other candidates to pick from. The Dems put her out there as the answer to everything and now you are stuck with her. These experts, are they inside or outside the beltway? I am talking regular folks that just don't like her. I think there are some experts that say she is just plain not likeable and they are trying to make her more caring.
10 to 20 percent of American paid attention to yesterday. When the ads start against Hillary, which the Republican Party can start running now, she is going to get Romnied, which is a plus for the Republicans.
You are also going to see the economy start in, that is what people care about. They don't care about global warming, or gay marriage, they care about the economy. Lots of people hurting right now and that will most likely show in the elections.
I think a Hillary/Bernie ticket would be tough to beat. Bernie would bring in the progressives and help with energy. Hillary would shore up the woman, Latino, and centrist vote. They already have a very cordial relationship and seem to work well off of each other as the debate showed. I'm not sure who the Republicans could put up there that could beat this combination.
Is it warm and dusty in there?Actually I would define Hillary as anything but tired. She seems fired up. She brought her A game to the debate, has been more than happy to go on the offense concerning Benghazi, and handled 11 hours of politically motivated witch hunting by the right. Tired is the last thing Hillary is.
That ticket seems a little gray to me. I'd rather have Castro for VP. The Ds need to think about their bench.I think a Hillary/Bernie ticket would be tough to beat. Bernie would bring in the progressives and help with energy. Hillary would shore up the woman, Latino, and centrist vote. They already have a very cordial relationship and seem to work well off of each other as the debate showed. I'm not sure who the Republicans could put up there that could beat this combination.