ADVERTISEMENT

Hillary needs to answer one question

I know the dems here keep saying that the cons are handing the election to Hillary. However, if you look at the most recent polls that just isn't the case. Sanders fares much better against the Republicans than Hillary does. I think there are 2 factors that could determine the next election.

1. Hillary doesn't excite the base like Obama did so getting as many Democrats out to vote may be tougher than the last 2 elections.

2. There is a HUGE section of people who are going to vote against Hillary. I am one of those and I haven't voted Republican since GWB the first time.
 
I've always wondered who it was that gave her permission to use the unusual and unprecedented email setup. :p
 
I know the dems here keep saying that the cons are handing the election to Hillary. However, if you look at the most recent polls that just isn't the case. Sanders fares much better against the Republicans than Hillary does. I think there are 2 factors that could determine the next election.

1. Hillary doesn't excite the base like Obama did so getting as many Democrats out to vote may be tougher than the last 2 elections.

2. There is a HUGE section of people who are going to vote against Hillary. I am one of those and I haven't voted Republican since GWB the first time.

I guess it will come down to how many people won't vote for either Trump or Clinton no matter what. If Trump really is the nominee, that number will be very high.
 
I guess it will come down to how many people won't vote for either Trump or Clinton no matter what. If Trump really is the nominee, that number will be very high.
I haven't voted for a Republican for President since Papa Bush's first election but I would vote for Trump over Hillary. I will not support her.
 
Why did she keep the emails for 2 years after she left office?

Why did it take so long for her to produce the emails to the Benghazi committee?
 
Why did she keep the emails for 2 years after she left office?

Why did it take so long for her to produce the emails to the Benghazi committee?


The State Department has to go through them to determine if there is anything classified that needs redacted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
The State Department has to go through them to determine if there is anything classified that needs redacted.

Why woukd there be anything classified? Hillary said she didn't receive or send ANY classified material on the server that was in that bathroom closet in Colorado.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unIowa
1) Why were the Ambassadors requests for more security denied?
2) On the anniversary of 9/11 why weren't more armed forces staged/on alert worldwide?
3) Was there really no way to send help after the attack started?
4) Why did the Obama team all blame the video AFTER they knew it was a planned attack and not a spontaneous demonstration?
 
I was surprised. I have some friends who are big dems. Their conversation last night, we will NOT vote for Hillary. Flat out said we just don't trust her
 
Rocket- I've had the same experience with die hard dems.there is even a dem politician friend of mine who wouldn't vote for here.she is such a liar.
 
Rocket- I've had the same experience with die hard dems.there is even a dem politician friend of mine who wouldn't vote for here.she is such a liar.

And on the other side of the spectrum...There are many GOPers and political experts out there saying......"When's the inaguaration?"

The GOP and this committee gained nothing from yesterday...except make Hillary look pretty damned smart.
 
She is a tired old women who has no soul!

She knew they were lying about the video and she looked those family members in the eyes and told them the video caused it! Rights as the bodies were being unloaded from the plane.
 
I know the dems here keep saying that the cons are handing the election to Hillary. However, if you look at the most recent polls that just isn't the case. Sanders fares much better against the Republicans than Hillary does. I think there are 2 factors that could determine the next election.

1. Hillary doesn't excite the base like Obama did so getting as many Democrats out to vote may be tougher than the last 2 elections.

2. There is a HUGE section of people who are going to vote against Hillary. I am one of those and I haven't voted Republican since GWB the first time.
[1] I agree. Selection of VP needs to address this.

[2] Why vote GOP just because you don't like Hillary? Why not vote Libertarian or some other 3rd party>
 
I've always wondered who it was that gave her permission to use the unusual and unprecedented email setup. :p
Email accounts are considered "arms" so the use of a private email server is constitutionally protected.

I mean if the pen is mightier than the sword, then surely email is comparable to a gun. Right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
I haven't voted for a Republican for President since Papa Bush's first election but I would vote for Trump over Hillary. I will not support her.
Again, why not a 3rd party candidate?

If people won't vote 3rd party when both major parties put up stinkers, then all 3rd parties may just as well hang it up.
 
[1] I agree. Selection of VP needs to address this.

[2] Why vote GOP just because you don't like Hillary? Why not vote Libertarian or some other 3rd party>

People who don't like Hilary aren't going to throw away their votes to someone who can't possibly beat her. Now if we ever had a truly competitive three-way race, that dynamic could come into play, but the system is stacked against independent or minor party candidates.

Ross Perot was considered a formidable third-party candidate even though he received less than 20 percent of the vote and no electoral college votes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Hillary: "Who is the real mother of Chelsea?"

Bottom Line: Hillary and Bill did not conceive her.
She was adopted by them.
 
People who don't like Hilary aren't going to throw away their votes to someone who can't possibly beat her. Now if we ever had a truly competitive three-way race, that dynamic could come into play, but the system is stacked against independent or minor party candidates.

Ross Perot was considered a formidable third-party candidate even though he received less than 20 percent of the vote and no electoral college votes.
You are definitely correct about the system being stacked against outsiders. But, again, if we won't vote 3rd party when so many people don't like the front runners, we may just as well roll over and give up.

Unfortunately, whoever the Ds and Rs choose, and however much we dislike them now, by the time the election rolls around, most D and R voters will be happy with their candidate and convinced the other person is the Antichrist.
 
People who don't like Hilary aren't going to throw away their votes to someone who can't possibly beat her. Now if we ever had a truly competitive three-way race, that dynamic could come into play, but the system is stacked against independent or minor party candidates.

Ross Perot was considered a formidable third-party candidate even though he received less than 20 percent of the vote and no electoral college votes.

THe sad thing is might be that Hillary is "the best" of what's out there now. It's a tough job that over the last 40 years has been hacked by partisanship, most of which is semantically driven drivel and refusing to accept the rule of law. No POTUS will have it made.
However, there is already talk among conservatives to impeach Hillary if she becomes POTUS.......wtf! Even the Dems waited for Nixon to step on his dick before they started hearings.
 
And on the other side of the spectrum...There are many GOPers and political experts out there saying......"When's the inaguaration?"

The GOP and this committee gained nothing from yesterday...except make Hillary look pretty damned smart.

In your eyes Joel. Because you have no other candidates to pick from. The Dems put her out there as the answer to everything and now you are stuck with her. These experts, are they inside or outside the beltway? I am talking regular folks that just don't like her. I think there are some experts that say she is just plain not likeable and they are trying to make her more caring.

10 to 20 percent of American paid attention to yesterday. When the ads start against Hillary, which the Republican Party can start running now, she is going to get Romnied, which is a plus for the Republicans.

You are also going to see the economy start in, that is what people care about. They don't care about global warming, or gay marriage, they care about the economy. Lots of people hurting right now and that will most likely show in the elections.
 
I think a Hillary/Bernie ticket would be tough to beat. Bernie would bring in the progressives and help with energy. Hillary would shore up the woman, Latino, and centrist vote. They already have a very cordial relationship and seem to work well off of each other as the debate showed. I'm not sure who the Republicans could put up there that could beat this combination.
 
She is a tired old women who has no soul!

She knew they were lying about the video and she looked those family members in the eyes and told them the video caused it! Rights as the bodies were being unloaded from the plane.
Not really.
 
I would like to see Trump's "we will be saying Merry Christmas at every corner and window" or such statement hold for whomever gets in office.

Hillary is a no, Trump is a no.. 3rd party is who? Nat and Hawktimus ticket?
 
In your eyes Joel. Because you have no other candidates to pick from. The Dems put her out there as the answer to everything and now you are stuck with her. These experts, are they inside or outside the beltway? I am talking regular folks that just don't like her. I think there are some experts that say she is just plain not likeable and they are trying to make her more caring.

10 to 20 percent of American paid attention to yesterday. When the ads start against Hillary, which the Republican Party can start running now, she is going to get Romnied, which is a plus for the Republicans.

You are also going to see the economy start in, that is what people care about. They don't care about global warming, or gay marriage, they care about the economy. Lots of people hurting right now and that will most likely show in the elections.
Lots of people have been hurting for 30+ years now because of the flow of jobs from the USA abroad. "swiftboating" is a long revered tradition of GOP politics. You underestimate the strength of Hillary. That is a mistake. Even a patisan like Jow Scarborogh is scratching his head this AM wondering what the committee is all about. Make no mistake....Thursday was a HUGE day for Hillary. It was not a good day for Mr. Gowdy and his committee.
On your other point....Chuck Todd was on MJ Thursday AM before the hearings...His assessment was that after all was said and done, about 25% of folks will think Hillary is hiding something/lying....about 25% of folks will think the committee is on a Hillary bashing witch hunt, and about 50% of folks will wish there was a ball game to watch.
 
Actually I would define Hillary as anything but tired. She seems fired up. She brought her A game to the debate, has been more than happy to go on the offense concerning Benghazi, and handled 11 hours of politically motivated witch hunting by the right. Tired is the last thing Hillary is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I think a Hillary/Bernie ticket would be tough to beat. Bernie would bring in the progressives and help with energy. Hillary would shore up the woman, Latino, and centrist vote. They already have a very cordial relationship and seem to work well off of each other as the debate showed. I'm not sure who the Republicans could put up there that could beat this combination.

Not sure how you see her getting the female vote:

2300clintonPoll0915.jpg
 
Actually I would define Hillary as anything but tired. She seems fired up. She brought her A game to the debate, has been more than happy to go on the offense concerning Benghazi, and handled 11 hours of politically motivated witch hunting by the right. Tired is the last thing Hillary is.
Is it warm and dusty in there?
 
I think a Hillary/Bernie ticket would be tough to beat. Bernie would bring in the progressives and help with energy. Hillary would shore up the woman, Latino, and centrist vote. They already have a very cordial relationship and seem to work well off of each other as the debate showed. I'm not sure who the Republicans could put up there that could beat this combination.
That ticket seems a little gray to me. I'd rather have Castro for VP. The Ds need to think about their bench.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N_fuego
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT