Does his scheme work? Lots of threes, sketchy defense and average at best rebounding.
Not many B10 teams score 80 points consistently in conference play.
Not many B10 teams score 80 points consistently in conference play.
Does his scheme work? Lots of threes, sketchy defense and average at best rebounding.
Not many B10 teams score 80 points consistently in conference play.
I completely disagree. For a whole lot of reasons. Completely different systems.Honestly I don't mean this to offend anybody but you're basically describing Iowa. I think Iowa this year played very, very much like a Hoiberg team.
It’ll probably work just a little bit less than it even worked in the Big12.Does his scheme work? Lots of threes, sketchy defense and average at best rebounding.
Not many B10 teams score 80 points consistently in conference play.
Does his scheme work? Lots of threes, sketchy defense and average at best rebounding.
Not many B10 teams score 80 points consistently in conference play.
Honestly I don't mean this to offend anybody but you're basically describing Iowa. I think Iowa this year played very, very much like a Hoiberg team.
May I introduce your 2018-19 Iowa Hawkeyes.Does his scheme work? Lots of threes, sketchy defense and average at best rebounding.
Not many B10 teams score 80 points consistently in conference play.
That sounds exactly like Iowa all season. They only stay in games if the 3's are going down and they never get a meaningful rebound when needed.I don’t know much about hoiburg but that does sound a lot like Iowa.
It’ll probably work just a little bit less than it even worked in the Big12.
No conference titles & middle of the pack finishes.
Nowhere NEAR as much overall quickness and athleticism, which were hallmarks of the mayor's teams at ISU. On the flip side, Iowa had FAR MORE size and muscle up front.Honestly I don't mean this to offend anybody but you're basically describing Iowa. I think Iowa this year played very, very much like a Hoiberg team.