You’re not wrong. There’s NOTHING worse than a Democrat in their minds. Thanks FOX and Rush.
How exhausting must it be…
- Thread starter RagnarLothbrok
- Start date
Honestly, there’s a lot of truth to what you’re saying.
For me, there’s just something fascinating about a slow-moving train wreck that thousands enthusiastically want to stand in front of. You just can’t help but stare from afar completely dumbfounded.
And the rape is probably not even his worst offense. The dude stole ****ing classified documents and refused to return them. I mean c'mon you know he's doing nefarious shit with them why else did he want to keep them so badly?
Oh and he tried to overthrow a free and fair election as well. The morons here are always like hey look over here it was just a bunch of rowdy tourists. That part barely even matters he freaking tried to send fake electors.
It's pretty ****ing bad when rape is probably the 3rd worst reason not to vote for someone and there are probably hundreds if not thousands of other reasons he shouldn't ever come close to being in the oval office again but a bunch of God damn morons can't tell their ass from their feet and they are working very hard to give this literal traitor the keys to the country. They have to be damn near brain dead to be this stupid or ****ing evil sons a bitches. Those are the only two options at this point.
I think the most stupid among them do believe that but I think most of them just use it as cover to protect their egos. They are so deep into this they feel like they can't turn back now so they keep defending the indefensible. As OP stated it has to be exhausting but they can't admit they were wrong at this point. They should look into the sunken cost fallacy because they are just making it worst they should just admit now that they were wrong because it is only going to get worse and they will have worse things to defend.
I've said over and over the only way you can support the fool still at this point is if you are stupid or evil. They always try to play the whatabout and both sides game but intelligent people know both sides aren't the same so those excuses ring hallow. It is beyond time they accept they were gotten by a con man
No, I don't know if she is or not, but to even compare her to Trump is fvcking laughable...if she was even a 1/20th of Trump I would have heard something by now
Holy shit... that's your evidence? Can't make this shit up.
If you have the facts, pound the facts, if you have the law, pound the law, if you don't have either....... create a thread about how it must be exhausting to defend your position.
You guys ran a vegetable for 12 months while we told you he was failing and have followed him with a lady incapable of walking and chewing bubble gum without her emotional support grandpa.
Enjoy your thread.
You guys ran a vegetable for 12 months while we told you he was failing and have followed him with a lady incapable of walking and chewing bubble gum without her emotional support grandpa.
Enjoy your thread.
Yup. Whether true or not, people felt abandoned by the system. They were watching their way of life slowly die (sometimes not so slowly) and they felt like no one cared. You find people like that, you give them someone to blame, and you promise that you'll go after THOSE people. It won't do a damn thing to help the lost folks but it gives them something to hold onto and it fools them into thinking someone cares about their plight. The GOP was and is absolutely devoid of ideas - this was and is their path to hold on to power.
I’ll never understand how he survived during the 2016 primaries and ever since really all the controversies, gaffes, etc that he did to himself.
I can understand in the general election in ‘16 why enough people voted him over Hillary. The years of dragging her name thru the mud by republicans to convince people she was corrupt, a crook, and such; and frankly, she was simply not good at campaigning. I’m not sure there have been too many candidates in my lifetime that knew policy backwards and forwards - whether or not you agreed with her is a separate question, but she simply didn’t have that ability to capture the room like her husband, Obama, Bush and even Trump could. Hard to win elections when you can’t do that.
Harris is a crook? What did she do?
And sorry, no, not an idiot.
Doesn't take a hell of an IQ to remember the good that happened during his admin vs the current. But, not remembering the past is probably a good indication of a bit of lacking upstairs for some folks
There’s so many examples of corruption from her days as AG: tote your own water next time. As for being an idiot, she reinforces that claim every time she speaks. Just like Donny.
“The misconduct in this case is so pervasive,” [California Superior Court judge Leslie] Nichols wrote, “that it would serve no purpose to attempt to recite it all here.”
Nichols also didn’t spare the office of California Attorney General Kamala Harris, now a candidate for Barbara Boxer’s U.S. Senate seat and a national Democratic star. Nichols wrote that he can recall “no instance in experience over 47 years as an advocate and a judge, in which the conduct of the Attorney General so thoroughly departed from the high standard it represents, and, in every other instance has exemplified.” Judge Nichols then ordered the state to pay Sierra Pacific a whopping $32 million in damages and expenses. Cal Fire denies any wrongdoing, while the offices of Harris and Governor Jerry Brown aren’t talking.
Here’s the question not like Trump inherited a terrible economy, nor did we experience a booming one under him with GDP increasing by +4/+5% either. So, was the good we experienced because of Trump, or despite him?
Remember, besides the controversial tax cuts he rammed thru - and that Trump didn’t especially lead on, there’s no other significant legislation that he passed.
You made the claim, burden of proof is on you. Crook means you say she broke laws. I hate to break it to you, but misconduct isn’t a crime, nor does this blurb you provided give any details on what this case was about, or what happened in it.There’s so many examples of corruption from her days as AG: tote your own water next time. As for being an idiot, she reinforces that claim every time she speaks. Just like Donny.
“The misconduct in this case is so pervasive,” [California Superior Court judge Leslie] Nichols wrote, “that it would serve no purpose to attempt to recite it all here.”
Nichols also didn’t spare the office of California Attorney General Kamala Harris, now a candidate for Barbara Boxer’s U.S. Senate seat and a national Democratic star. Nichols wrote that he can recall “no instance in experience over 47 years as an advocate and a judge, in which the conduct of the Attorney General so thoroughly departed from the high standard it represents, and, in every other instance has exemplified.” Judge Nichols then ordered the state to pay Sierra Pacific a whopping $32 million in damages and expenses. Cal Fire denies any wrongdoing, while the offices of Harris and Governor Jerry Brown aren’t talking.
A live look at Both Sides after posting in the Arlington thread. He's putting in full shifts daily just asking questions.
Crook. Idiot.
www.downeybrand.com
Moonlight Wildfire Litigation
Our expertise in complex wildfire litigation is demonstrated by the California Moonlight Fire case. Learn more about our experience in wildfire litigation.
www.downeybrand.com
Prosecutors protect themselves first: Column
When prosecutors lie and falsify evidence, 'absolute immunity' protects them from justice.
www.usatoday.com
That would read that the prosecuting attorney lied, not Harris here. So again, what crime did she commit?Crook. Idiot.
Moonlight Wildfire Litigation
Our expertise in complex wildfire litigation is demonstrated by the California Moonlight Fire case. Learn more about our experience in wildfire litigation.
Prosecutors protect themselves first: Column
When prosecutors lie and falsify evidence, 'absolute immunity' protects them from justice.www.usatoday.com
Listen to Fux News or conservative talk radio for as long as you can. It is CONSTANT spewing of everything you describe. Seriously brain washing people. I have a BIL who is in hook, line and sinker with that crap.
Things ok at home, Bud? By the way Easy Eddy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Coors Original
- Sep 13, 2002
- 97,904
- 204,179
- 113
Ahhhh, so that’s your schpeel. Apathy and low voter turn out. Who does that favor, comrade? 🤔
Why would you take the time to cast a vote for someone you don’t want as president?
Because one will be elected even if you don't vote. You have the right not to vote but, to me, that means you don't care. And if you don't care, don't bitch about what you get.
Hope a lot of republicans feel that way this election.
I comprehend this thought process but in a more literal sense, voting for a particular person means you support them.
Walking out and driving away from the voting location knowing you just voted for someone you don't support or even like the least bit is a terrible feeling.
Every single response he has tries to create apathy in the voting public. He is going to vote. Who does low voter turnout help the most? Not too hard to figure him out…
Lol. Who dat?
A live look at Both Sides after posting in the Arlington thread. He's putting in full shifts daily just asking questions.
The way the elctions are it's a zero sum game. You have two choices - pick against the worst one.
Voting in this country is like walking into an ice cream shop serving only two varieties: vanilla with rat shit sprinkles or vanilla with possum shit sprinkles.
No thanks.
If you’re not going to participate in the process, don’t then complain about it.
Fact is, whether you like it or not, either Harris or Trump will be the next president. Would be nice if we had two fantastic choices to choose between, but frankly, that’s rarely been the case…ever.
So you have to choose the one you dislike the least. If you don’t, then imo, you forfeited the right to complain about it.
I'm unsurprised you would equate choosing the leader of our country to have the same importance and consequences as choosing ice cream. SMFH
The thing is that they don't really defend Trump. They just go and point out something the Dem did that was like 1/10th as bad.
When it comes down to it they enjoy the hate, the bulling, the purposeful and consistent cruelty. Those things are fun, what do they care if the person that said them breaks the law, sexually assaults women or has the vocabulary of a third grader.
When it comes down to it they enjoy the hate, the bulling, the purposeful and consistent cruelty. Those things are fun, what do they care if the person that said them breaks the law, sexually assaults women or has the vocabulary of a third grader.
To answer OP's question and address the topic, I don't think that it's difficult for his supporters to advocate for him (they don't feel that they need to defend him).
Why? I think it was The Economist, though I may be wrong, that put the data out there that Trump voters watch Fox News and Newsmax almost exclusively and get their online info from social media where their personal feed is almost exclusively pro-Trump. This is what they believe and they view the MSM and others as perpetuating falsehoods.
What you hear from them is what they believe to be true.
His convictions? Crooked judges and political courts.
Civil suits? They want his money.
Biden? Worst President ever.
Kamala? Communist.
January 6th? Political protest.
The list goes on, and they don't care what anybody else thinks because everybody else is the cause of their perceived problems.
Why? I think it was The Economist, though I may be wrong, that put the data out there that Trump voters watch Fox News and Newsmax almost exclusively and get their online info from social media where their personal feed is almost exclusively pro-Trump. This is what they believe and they view the MSM and others as perpetuating falsehoods.
What you hear from them is what they believe to be true.
His convictions? Crooked judges and political courts.
Civil suits? They want his money.
Biden? Worst President ever.
Kamala? Communist.
January 6th? Political protest.
The list goes on, and they don't care what anybody else thinks because everybody else is the cause of their perceived problems.
LOL...given your epic fail in the Trump moron thread, you might want to take the week off.
Both sides do this, dummy.
Each side has their source(s) of information and that’s what they choose to believe.
@RileyHawk Why is it funny?
Last edited:
