A
anon_0pi0cv8t1ggvb
Guest
Just say "No," to the Oxford comma. It's not needed. The inclusion of "and," not only clarifies but also serves as a pause between the listed items or activities.
The court system would disagree with you. $10 million dollar comma.
https://thewritelife.com/is-the-oxford-comma-necessary/
And isn't a direct equivalent to a comma.
Here's a good example of why the oxford comma isn't redundant and helps to clarify meaning: (excerpt from the link)
----
For those in need of a grammar refresh, the Oxford (or serial) comma is a comma placed between the last two items in a series of three or more. For instance, “I like cake, pizza, and ice cream.”
Proponents of the Oxford comma argue it’s necessary to avoid potential ambiguity.
In the example sentence, it’s clear I like three types of food in and of themselves. Remove it and the sentence reads, “I like cake, pizza and ice cream” — leading to the potential to read the last two items as one combination item. I no longer like pizza and ice cream on their own, one could argue; I like pizza and ice cream only when they’re together. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that.)