How Ridiculous Will Hillary's Email Explanation Be?

[swagsurfer02]

Originally posted by Lone Clone:

Originally posted by naturalmwa:

Originally posted by NoleandDawg:

Originally posted by slieb85:

Originally posted by NoleandDawg:
She will come up with some lame excuse, and then say some republican sometime sent some email off of a govt server at some time. The shallow libs will lap it up to be sure.

You do realize that she's already talked about this, and that pretty much everyone in this thread has universally called her out, right?

Forgive me. I did not realize that this thread encompassed the entirety of libraldom in the United States. Also I may accept that some liberals are outraged by this but we all know that once she's nominated you libs will do exactly as I've suggested. This phony outrage is just that, phony. When push comes to shove you all will tow the party line. 

Do you think this should be a big voting issue?  Let me think that through.  So say its Hill v Bush in 2016.  They both have similar economic plans, both have similar neocon foreign policy plans, both have the same email issue, both have the same education, immigration, environmental plans.  Hill plans to keep pushing universal healthcare and Bush plans to roll it back. I like Universal healthcare, so that means I'm going to toss my lot in with hTheyer.  Why would you think that this email issue or her general unlikeability would be a major voting issue when the alternative is I lose something real and tangible that I value?  That just seems dumb.  

They do not have the same e-mail issue. Not even close.

And yes, it should be a major issue, because it is part and parcel of her efforts to hide her work as SecState from the public. 

What difference does it make?
Posted from Rivals Mobile

 

[naturalmwa]

Originally posted by Lone Clone:
They do not have the same e-mail issue. Not even close.

And yes, it should be a major issue, because it is part and parcel of her efforts to hide her work as SecState from the public.

We disagree, they are pretty similar. Both used private servers to conduct personal and public business from one account. Both released some, but not all mail at their discretion. Bush even released private personal info in violation of the law.

 

[dandh]

Originally posted by naturalmwa:

Originally posted by Lone Clone:


They do not have the same e-mail issue. Not even close.

And yes, it should be a major issue, because it is part and parcel of her efforts to hide her work as SecState from the public.

We disagree, they are pretty similar. Both used private servers to conduct personal and public business from one account. Both released some, but not all mail at their discretion. Bush even released private personal info in violation of the law.

So, if you won't vote for Bush on that basis, will it also prevent you from voting for Hillary?
This post was edited on 3/12 10:11 AM by dandh

 

[naturalmwa]

Originally posted by dandh:

Originally posted by naturalmwa:

Originally posted by Lone Clone:


They do not have the same e-mail issue. Not even close.

And yes, it should be a major issue, because it is part and parcel of her efforts to hide her work as SecState from the public.

We disagree, they are pretty similar. Both used private servers to conduct personal and public business from one account. Both released some, but not all mail at their discretion. Bush even released private personal info in violation of the law.

So, if you won't vote for Bush on that basis, will it also prevent you from voting for Hillary?
This post was edited on 3/12 10:11 AM by dandh

That's not the basis for my opposition against Bush. I already said I didn't think this email issue should be a vote decider. Hill isn't anyone I'd be excited to vote for. The one advantage I see her holding over Bush is her support of the ACA. Otherwise I see them both as corporatists neocons willing to sell out the average taxpayer for Wall Street both domestically and internationally. I'f I'm getting sold down the river, I want my anti-depressants covered. My view is whomever gets in the WH, conservative views are going to be better represented. The liberals aren't even running a candidate.

 

[hawkhead87]

Not a huge fan of HC but dont hate her. I dont think she will be a bad president if she is similar to Bill. The emails are not even close to what I would like for her to explain or answer or clarify but she is a politician so wont get answered.

Also I dont want Bush to run, even though I think he would do a good job, because his last name is Bush

 

[rocketclone]

Originally posted by swagsurfer02:

Originally posted by Lone Clone:

Originally posted by naturalmwa:

Originally posted by NoleandDawg:

Originally posted by slieb85:

Originally posted by NoleandDawg:
She will come up with some lame excuse, and then say some republican sometime sent some email off of a govt server at some time. The shallow libs will lap it up to be sure.

You do realize that she's already talked about this, and that pretty much everyone in this thread has universally called her out, right?

Forgive me. I did not realize that this thread encompassed the entirety of libraldom in the United States. Also I may accept that some liberals are outraged by this but we all know that once she's nominated you libs will do exactly as I've suggested. This phony outrage is just that, phony. When push comes to shove you all will tow the party line.Â

Do you think this should be a big voting issue? Â Let me think that through. Â So say its Hill v Bush in 2016. Â They both have similar economic plans, both have similar neocon foreign policy plans, both have the same email issue, both have the same education, immigration, environmental plans. Â Hill plans to keep pushing universal healthcare and Bush plans to roll it back. I like Universal healthcare, so that means I'm going to toss my lot in with hTheyer. Â Why would you think that this email issue or her general unlikeability would be a major voting issue when the alternative is I lose something real and tangible that I value? Â That just seems dumb. Â

They do not have the same e-mail issue. Not even close.

And yes, it should be a major issue, because it is part and parcel of her efforts to hide her work as SecState from the public.Â

What difference does it make?

Posted from Rivals Mobile

LOL LOL well played...........

 

[dandh]

Originally posted by naturalmwa:

Originally posted by dandh:

Originally posted by naturalmwa:

That's not the basis for my opposition against Bush. I already said I didn't think this email issue should be a vote decider. Hill isn't anyone I'd be excited to vote for. The one advantage I see her holding over Bush is her support of the ACA. Otherwise I see them both as corporatists neocons willing to sell out the average taxpayer for Wall Street both domestically and internationally. I'f I'm getting sold down the river, I want my anti-depressants covered. My view is whomever gets in the WH, conservative views are going to be better represented. The liberals aren't even running a candidate.

You would not have insurance absent the ACA?

 

[naturalmwa]

Originally posted by dandh:

Originally posted by naturalmwa:

Originally posted by dandh:

Originally posted by naturalmwa:

That's not the basis for my opposition against Bush. I already said I didn't think this email issue should be a vote decider. Hill isn't anyone I'd be excited to vote for. The one advantage I see her holding over Bush is her support of the ACA. Otherwise I see them both as corporatists neocons willing to sell out the average taxpayer for Wall Street both domestically and internationally. I'f I'm getting sold down the river, I want my anti-depressants covered. My view is whomever gets in the WH, conservative views are going to be better represented. The liberals aren't even running a candidate.

You would not have insurance absent the ACA?

It was a general comment meant to convey my support for the goal of universal coverage, not a personal comment on my specific health needs.

 

[THE_DEVIL]

update?

 

[Gimmered]

update?

Well the American public didn't but her bullshit and gave us President Trump. You just wake up from along nap?

 

[UNIowaHawk]

update?

Well the American public didn't but her bullshit and gave us President Trump. You just wake up from along nap?

Basically this. Thanks Democrats and Republicans alike for effing up this country even more.

 

[dgordo]

update?

 

[tarheelbybirth]

WTF?

 

[Lone Clone]

WTF?

There are two threads from 2015 on the page. Perhaps someone thought that was a very good year.

 

[WorldSeriesChamps2015]

There are two threads from 2015 on the page. Perhaps someone thought that was a very good year.

Of course it was, The Royals won the World Series!

 

[IamHawkeye]

Leading up to the big news conference Hillary will be holding to explain the need for a personal email server hidden in a false wall of her home, I'm wondering how she will explain this fiasco. Will be someone else's fault, her own lack of sophistication about email rules, or some other hard-to-believe scenario?

I, for one, can't wait to hear what she has to say about it. I just can't figure out which way she'll take it, However, I'll be surprised if it's any more credible the the Lois Lerner email stories.

Somehow I get the idea that many neither understand or care about the email, except when it's Hillary or possibly someone else whose politics they don't like

 

[Hawk in SEC Country]

Apparently she didn't know you can have multiple email accounts on one phone. What a dumb excuse.

The adult excuse of “the dog ate my homework”.

This is an intelligent person. She’s playing everyone for idiots.

 

[tarheelbybirth]

There are two threads from 2015 on the page. Perhaps someone thought that was a very good year.

Vintage threads.

 

[Greenway12]

 

[Joes Place]

update?

Damn, man....3 YEARS and 0 indictments?

Shoot, in 1/3 the time, we've got like 19 indictments on the whole Trump-Russia thing.....