ADVERTISEMENT

Hunter Biden attorney threatens litigation against Fox News

Yes, but I’m not letting my client answer everything, and if they keep going down a bullshit path, we call the Judge from the depo.
Yep

And if the lawyer refuses to swing back to relevant questioning, depo is over.
And if the lawyer engages in improper behavior, it may not be over, for him.

Ergo, they cannot "ask anything". They must remain on-topic and relevant to the case in point.

@Finance85 is an abject idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huey Grey
Yep

And if the lawyer refuses to swing back to relevant questioning, depo is over.
And if the lawyer engages in improper behavior, it may not be over, for him.

Ergo, they cannot "ask anything". They must remain on-topic and relevant to the case in point.

@Finance85 is an abject idiot.
Nope. You are wrong, but you will never admit it.

There's a purpose to asking questions that a lawyer know won't be answered. In this case the purpose would be to force Hunter to refuse to answer on 5th amendment grounds, so the civil action can be delayed until the criminal action is concluded. If the question isn't asked, there's no basis for a request for delay.

Lawyers also ask questions to establish what the boundaries are. Most of the time they know they are out of bounds, but if they are any good, they will push as far as they can without alienating the judge. Once in awhile they will get a smug or dumb litigant to answer a question that's out of bounds, and provides valuable information. Civil depositions typically have great latitude.

Why do you think that's somehow defending Fox? It's a legal discussion you clearly don't understand. Is that it? You attack what you don't understand because of your overwhelming need to never be wrong, even when it's demonstrated you are wrong? See my post #8.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkedoff
Nope. You are wrong, but you will never admit it.

There's a purpose to asking questions that a lawyer know won't be answered. In this case the purpose would be to force Hunter to refuse to answer on 5th amendment grounds

No; he can refuse to answer on lack of "relevance".
You cannot "ask anything you want" in a deposition.

Lawyers on here have already pointed this out for you.
 
No; he can refuse to answer on lack of "relevance".
You cannot "ask anything you want" in a deposition.

Lawyers on here have already pointed this out for you.
You can ask anything.

It can be objected to, but the answer can only be refused based on the rules of the court, which I posted for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkedoff
You can ask anything.

It can be objected to, but the answer can only be refused based on the rules of the court, which I posted for you.
what is going to be asked that hasn't been investigated and ultimately debunked by comer and jordan

are you saying they've left stuff on the table?
 
What was on the laptop?
twd-stuff-and-things.gif
 
what is going to be asked that hasn't been investigated and ultimately debunked by comer and jordan

are you saying they've left stuff on the table?
I'm discussing the legal aspects. Are you interested in that topic, or the politics?

There's a purpose to a deposition, and asking questions is necessary for trial no matter what's in the public domain. Hunter is the one threatening to bring suit, and the burden of proof is on him, by preponderance of the evidence. He's also a public figure, which carries a slightly higher standard, and he's also claiming NIL ownership, which is another nuance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkedoff
Still can't find it.

Maybe Tucker Carlson can locate it on his next trip Moscow. Hopefully he's in town when NATO drops an atomic bomb.

THEY CAN'T FIND IT? Shit they had a committee wound around a corkscrew ready to throw this guy in prison and impeach his father and.........

they don't have this infamous laptop they said was chock full of salacious info. JFC, does anyone tell the truth? This House of Representatives is a snake pit of liars, thieves, cheats and crooks.
 
THEY CAN'T FIND IT? Shit they had a committee wound around a corkscrew ready to throw this guy in prison and impeach his father and.........

they don't have this infamous laptop they said was chock full of salacious info. JFC, does anyone tell the truth? This House of Representatives is a snake pit of liars, thieves, cheats and crooks.
The FBI has it.
 
The FBI has it.

Well, if that's the case the evidence is available. Where is it? I suppose the FBI is conspiring to suppress it.

That would make another conspiracy theory, wouldn't it?

Surprise, surprise.
 
Hunter Biden and his attorneys have sent a letter making several demands of Fox News, including one that threatens litigation if the network does not remove content from its website that includes sexually explicit images of the president’s son.

Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment newsletter.

The letter also demands that Fox News issue a retraction or correction to news coverage about allegations that the Biden family was bribed by a Ukrainian oligarch. Much of that coverage was based on information from Alexander Smirnov, an FBI informant who said he had ties to Russian intelligence and has since been charged by the Justice Department with lying about the matter.

Much of the letter focuses on a six-part fictional series called “The Trial of Hunter Biden,” which was produced by Fox Nation and used actors to imagine what a courtroom case against the president’s son might look like. Hunter Biden’s attorneys state that while the series uses some real information — including emails, as well as images that Biden says are his — they create an unfair and false impression.



The letter, which was obtained by The Washington Post, was sent April 23 and demanded that Fox remove the material by April 26. Fox has not responded to the letter, according to representatives for Biden, and did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
“While using certain true information, the series intentionally manipulates the facts, distorts the truth, narrates happenings out of context, and invents dialogue intended to entertain,” says the 14-page letter, signed by Tina Glandian of Geragos & Geragos. “Thus, the viewer of the series cannot decipher what is fact and what is fiction, which is highly damaging to Mr. Biden.”
Glandian also says that the images belong to Biden and are being used without his permission. The letter cites laws against revenge porn in demanding that Fox remove the content.



“In addition to the unlawful commercial exploitation of Mr. Biden’s image, name, and likeness, ‘The Trial of Hunter Biden’ also unlawfully published and continues to publish intimate images of Mr. Biden depicting him in the nude as well as engaged in sex acts in violation of the majority of states’ laws against the nonconsensual disclosure of sexually explicit images and videos, sometimes referred to as ‘revenge porn’ laws,” the letter states.
icon-election.png

Follow Election 2024
The photos and emails are among the material that emerged from a laptop that Biden purportedly dropped off at a repair shop in Wilmington, Del., in 2019 and never retrieved. Biden has never conceded that he dropped the laptop off — saying his memory of that period is not clear due to a serious drug addiction — and has maintained that the material may have been hacked or stolen.
“By unlawfully publishing images of Mr. Biden depicting an unclothed or exposed intimate part of him and depicting him engaging in sexual conduct in order to harass, annoy, and alarm him, FOX has violated N.Y. Civil Rights section 52-b and Mr. Biden is entitled to not only compensatory and punitive damages and his attorney’s fees, but he is also entitled to injunctive relief, as demanded herein,” Glandian wrote in the letter to Fox.



Glandian also argued that because the series is presented as entertainment, the network should not benefit from the legal protections usually enjoyed by news outlets.
“The miniseries is fictionalized; it is not a news event,” the letter says. “It was made for the purpose of trade and advertising, and merely exploits Mr. Biden’s name, image, and likeness for FOX’s commercial benefit. Thus, FOX is not protected by the newsworthiness exception to the right of privacy/publicity statutes.”
The letter is part of an aggressive strategy that Hunter Biden and his camp have adopted in advance of two criminal trials that he faces, potentially as early as June, as well his father’s reelection campaign. Hunter Biden faces federal charges related to taxes and gun possession.
Last September, Hunter Biden sued Rudy Giuliani and Giuliani’s former lawyer, Bob Costello, charging that they misused his personal computer data. Around the same time, the president’s son sued the IRS for allegedly violating his privacy rights in the course of its own investigation.

If only Twitter was still owned by the previous regime, all this stuff could have stayed “under the table”.
 
The current GOP House will likely go down as the least accomplished and least productive Congress in Merican history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
The current GOP House will likely go down as the least accomplished and least productive Congress in Merican history.

Not true.

They impeached Mayorkas.
They tried to impeach Biden.
They tried to get Hunter to testify (he told them to fvck off).
I'm sure they renamed some buildings - they usually do.

They did get some money to Ukraine and Israel before Ukraine died.

They went to NYC to make some MAGAs were near the Orange Turd's trial.

More time and I'll think of something.

Of course you're right.
 
Not true.

They impeached Mayorkas.
They tried to impeach Biden.
They tried to get Hunter to testify (he told them to fvck off).
I'm sure they renamed some buildings - they usually do.

They did get some money to Ukraine and Israel before Ukraine died.

They went to NYC to make some MAGAs were near the Orange Turd's trial.

More time and I'll think of something.

Of course you're right.
what do you mean? they've uncovered tons of rock solid, verifiable evidence of joe biden's massive corruption

that they've then just decided to not do anything with
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
Yep

And if the lawyer refuses to swing back to relevant questioning, depo is over.
And if the lawyer engages in improper behavior, it may not be over, for him.

Ergo, they cannot "ask anything". They must remain on-topic and relevant to the case in point.

@Finance85 is an abject idiot.
LOL. You just be you. Apparently you need some education on deposition procedures.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kelsers
What could they dig up? Hunter has already been completely investigated by the nutbags Rs in the House. If there was anything, they would know by now.
Those investigations may, or may not be used as evidence in a civil case. It's procedural to have a deposition. The purpose of a deposition is twofold - to get information, and to have a record of testimony that will be compared to trial testimony.
 
Which would be irrelevant, because the chain of custody is so convoluted, there is nothing on the computer that would be admissible for any trial.
The laptop is being used as evidence in the gun case. In case you are unaware, the DoJ is bringing that case. The argument last week was what contents of the laptop would be allowed, not that the laptop was compromised, etc., etc.

Of course that objection could still be brought in the gun trial or IRS trial, but it hasn't been raised so far.
 
The laptop is being used as evidence in the gun case. In case you are unaware, the DoJ is bringing that case. The argument last week was what contents of the laptop would be allowed, not that the laptop was compromised, etc., etc.

Of course that objection could still be brought in the gun trial or IRS trial, but it hasn't been raised so far.

Contents of the laptop? Or social media posts unrelated to the laptop?
There's a big big difference here
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
what do you mean? they've uncovered tons of rock solid, verifiable evidence of joe biden's massive corruption

that they've then just decided to not do anything with

Uh hmm. The nutjob committee members wound tighter than violin strings decided not to do anything. They had to take bushels of exlax to get keep from blowing their brains out their arses. Nah.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT