They can and do weigh in on cases by refusing to hear them. But, so be it. We'll see how much the conservative/MAGA judges are being paid behind the scenes.This is an unprecedented case and the SC has to weigh in…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They can and do weigh in on cases by refusing to hear them. But, so be it. We'll see how much the conservative/MAGA judges are being paid behind the scenes.This is an unprecedented case and the SC has to weigh in…
considering he wasn't confirmed by the senate until March 2021, that would have been difficultGarland waiting 22 months to appoint a special counsel had nothing to do with due process. There's no reason he couldn't have appointed one in Feb of 2021.
More projection from another MAGA mouth breather.The mental illness on the left is out of control. How can you stay so angry for so long and not have it affect your personality and the way you view the world?
because mental illness is the only reason people think it's ridiculous to even entertain the thought that presidents should be permitted to commit crimes with impunityThe mental illness on the left is out of control. How can you stay so angry for so long and not have it affect your personality and the way you view the world?
Annnnnndddddd...ignore. We don't need anymore MAGA idiocy here.The mental illness on the left is out of control. How can you stay so angry for so long and not have it affect your personality and the way you view the world?
Because they're indicting a ****ing former president. That's not something you rush through to get it done quickly. You make sure you have the strongest case possible because you're indicting a ****ing former president.Due process.
Which raises the question. Why did it take 32 months to indict? I mean if it's critical to get the trial in before the election you'd think the justice department would have been balls to the wall to get this to trial. They had to have known there would be delay tactics by the Trump team.
It took over 2 and a half years to actually indict him.
Interesting. But the Supreme Court should rush through the appeal?Because they're indicting a ****ing former president. That's not something you rush through to get it done quickly. You make sure you have the strongest case possible because you're indicting a ****ing former president.
This isn't difficult stuff. For seeming like a pretty smart well rounded guy, you sure post some dumb shit sometimes, man.
The loud MAGA people I know are the angriest people I've ever met.The mental illness on the left is out of control. How can you stay so angry for so long and not have it affect your personality and the way you view the world?
Typical progressive response. And this is why you guys are wrong most of the time. You refuse to listen to anybody outside your echo chamber.Annnnnndddddd...ignore. We don't need anymore MAGA idiocy here.
Im.so smart.They just said the other guy can't be tried for the same crime because he doesn't have thr mental faculties to understand what he did was wrong. This is the middle of the road approach that keeps the power in the hands of the people that have it. It's a gambit they have to run.
The mental illness on the left is out of control. How can you stay so angry for so long and not have it affect your personality and the way you view the world?
The END of the term; NOT when the case will be decided.The court agreed to expedite the case and hear arguments the week of April 22.
This is an open-and-shut case, JUST LIKE the lower court outlined it.This is an unprecedented case and the SC has to weigh in…
Yes. There IS.There wasn’t an immediate need to expedite this
Going through the judicial process.
SCOTUS affirming the lower court ruling, by declining the case IS the "full extent of the judicial process".So you don't believe everyone is entitled to the full extent of the judicial process?
NopeDue process.
Then they should have taken it back in December if they insisted on having a say.Is it gross and unamerican to remove your chief political opponent off the ballot?
@binsfeldcyhawk2 is right. It's going through the judicial process and it's likely SCOTUS will rule against trump overwhelmingly. Nothing wrong with hearing it, because the issue will not be settled in the minds of Americans until the SCOTUS knocks him down for good.
Maybe they want to hear the case
One instance has come out of one of the several things I mentioned. Still not the same thing.Boy do you have some catching up to do...
Anyone else notice that Both Sides Bins is saying Trump deserves due process, but Garland should have slammed through a case without an investigation or facts, or a special counsel in such a politically fraught case.
Blame the delay on Garland. He procrastinated bigly.Then they should have taken it back in December if they insisted on having a say.
Delaying this plays into Trump's hand, and risks him regaining power, putting lackeys in key positions and completely destroying our democracy. He tried this on 1/6; he won't make the same mistakes again, because it'll be another Saturday Night Massacre across the board. He'd put Gen. Flynn in charge and take over the military.
This is pretty much how Hitler rose to power and completely took over Germany.
Appointing a special counsel to the case in 2021 wouldn't have rushed anything Lucas.Anyone else notice that Both Sides Bins is saying Trump deserves due process, but Garland should have slammed through a case without an investigation or facts, or a special counsel in such a politically fraught case.
Well don’t forget Trump was going to “go away” so there was really no hurry and it is imperative it has to be done right…Appointing a special counsel to the case in 2021 wouldn't have rushed anything Lucas.
He waited till November 2022....or 22 months after Jan 6.
If you want to blame anyone if this doesn't make it to trial before the election...blame him. At the very least he gets his share of the blame.
Well don’t forget Trump was going to “go away” so there was really no hurry and it is imperative it has to be done right…
I don’t think so. They wouldn’t have to have cut it so close to the election if he wasn’t running. They could take their time and dot the i’s and cross the t’s. Read a history book. Trump is a threat to our democracy. He flat out says it.Reasonable point,... If Trump would have gone "away" none of these cases would have been brought.
And we feel the exact same way about your side…Because we are sick to death of piece of shit Trump and his piece of shit followers
I don’t think so. They wouldn’t have to have cut it so close to the election if he wasn’t running. They could take their time and dot the i’s and cross the t’s. Read a history book. Trump is a threat to our democracy. He flat out says it.
Why are you so sure?Nah,.. Trump doesn't run, none of this shit happens, and as far as the Democracy goes, it will be just fine.
Why are you so sure?
Oh, ok.We survived a civil war,.. we will be fine.
You and your ilk are seriously mentally unwell.
Sorry boy, we all pray for Trump to defeat the demons who attack him.You and your ilk are seriously mentally unwell.
I'm not your boy. You aren't worth the shit under my shoes, idiot.Sorry boy, we all pray for Trump to defeat the demons who attack him.
We won the first one, we'll beat them again.We survived a civil war,.. we will be fine.
So you walk around with shit on your shoes?I'm not your boy. You aren't worth the shit under my shoes, idiot.