ADVERTISEMENT

If you didn’t complain about supposed Ukrainian info paid for....

AlphaTrion80

Scout Team
Sep 17, 2019
100
37
28
by the DNC Campaigns during the 2016 election, which at the time was fully controlled by Hillary Clinton as she used that signed over power to rig the primaries,.....

then I don’t care if you have a problem with Trump looking into what Hunter Biden was doing in Ukraine.

Especially with what we know about Hunters business dealings with China and the fact Biden is part of the untouchable crew.

That is all.
 
by the DNC Campaigns during the 2016 election, which at the time was fully controlled by Hillary Clinton as she used that signed over power to rig the primaries,.....

then I don’t care if you have a problem with Trump looking into what Hunter Biden was doing in Ukraine.

Especially with what we know about Hunters business dealings with China and the fact Biden is part of the untouchable crew.

That is all.
LOL...your desperation is showing.
 
LOL...your desperation is showing.
Explain. For one, nothing will come of this. Two, this is the epitome of hypocrisy.

Take your time to try and divert from the fact that this is almost exactly what happened in 2016, except that Trump is now President.

Which I would wager is the real problem you guys have. How many times do we have to play this game?
 
Explain. For one, nothing will come of this. Two, this is the epitome of hypocrisy.

Take your time to try and divert from the fact that this is almost exactly what happened in 2016, except that Trump is now President.

Which I would wager is the real problem you guys have. How many times do we have to play this game?
I'm at a loss. That you don't see the difference is...astounding. I suspect that you do but you "have no choice" but to blow Trump.
 
actually hunter biden was a grifter and sucking cash out of Ukraine, while joe threatened them if they investigated Hunters company......now that's been turned on its ear as a "investigation drama scandal smear" by the usual suspects

Saul Alinsky tacticts
 
actually hunter biden was a grifter and sucking cash out of Ukraine, while joe threatened them if they investigated Hunters company......now that's been turned on its ear as a "investigation drama scandal smear" by the usual suspects

Saul Alinsky tacticts
One man can clear this up. And he really doesn't have to expend much energy (thank gawd).

Release the transcripts and prove everyone wrong. Simple as that.
 
I'm at a loss. That you don't see the difference is...astounding. I suspect that you do but you "have no choice" but to blow Trump.
I don’t think you’re astounded, I just don’t think you know what to say. I think that when we break this down into layers, you’re going to understand that your argument can be sent back at any level you try to come at me with.
 
U.S. Code § 3033.Inspector General of the Intelligence Community

(5) An employee of an element of the intelligence community, an employee assigned or detailed to an element of the intelligence community, or an employee of a contractor to the intelligence community who intends to report to Congress a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern may report such complaint or information to the Inspector General.

(B) Not later than the end of the 14-calendar-day period beginning on the date of receipt from an
employee of a complaint or information under subparagraph (A), the Inspector General shall determine whether the complaint or information appears credible. Upon making such a determination, the Inspector General shall transmit to the Director a notice of that determination, together with the complaint or information.

(C)
Upon receipt of a transmittal from the Inspector General under subparagraph (B), the Director shall, within 7 calendar days of such receipt, forward such transmittal to the congressional intelligence committees, together with any comments the Director considers appropriate.

This is the law that the DNI is breaking. They (the DNI and IG) are required by law to forward the complaint to Congress. To date they have refused to do so, making their refusal criminal in nature.
 
U.S. Code § 3033.Inspector General of the Intelligence Community

(5) An employee of an element of the intelligence community, an employee assigned or detailed to an element of the intelligence community, or an employee of a contractor to the intelligence community who intends to report to Congress a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern may report such complaint or information to the Inspector General.

(B) Not later than the end of the 14-calendar-day period beginning on the date of receipt from an
employee of a complaint or information under subparagraph (A), the Inspector General shall determine whether the complaint or information appears credible. Upon making such a determination, the Inspector General shall transmit to the Director a notice of that determination, together with the complaint or information.

(C)
Upon receipt of a transmittal from the Inspector General under subparagraph (B), the Director shall, within 7 calendar days of such receipt, forward such transmittal to the congressional intelligence committees, together with any comments the Director considers appropriate.

This is the law that the DNI is breaking. They (the DNI and IG) are required by law to forward the complaint to Congress. To date they have refused to do so, making their refusal criminal in nature.
Oh I see, so what the Clinton campaign did in 2016 was not only illegal, but very illegal. Or do non-government officials have more power than Government employees?

Also, the fact the Obama administration did nothing about it was also damning?
 
Oh I see, so what the Clinton campaign did in 2016 was not only illegal, but very illegal. Or do non-government officials have more power than Government employees?

Also, the fact the Obama administration did nothing about it was also damning?
Why don’t you go make a citizens arrest, Officer Fife?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstp1992
I don’t think you’re astounded, I just don’t think you know what to say. I think that when we break this down into layers, you’re going to understand that your argument can be sent back at any level you try to come at me with.
Oh really...so come back at me with the President of the United States using the power of his office to push a foreign govt to manufacture dirt on a political rival. That is a "level" you can't hope to match. Only an idiot would think otherwise which is why I suspect you'll come back with a moronic retort.
 
This is the law that the DNI is breaking. They (the DNI and IG) are required by law to forward the complaint to Congress. To date they have refused to do so, making their refusal criminal in nature.
And the DNI is doing so on orders from a "higher authority". Name that higher authority.
 
Oh really...so come back at me with the President of the United States using the power of his office to push a foreign govt to manufacture dirt on a political rival. That is a "level" you can't hope to match. Only an idiot would think otherwise which is why I suspect you'll come back with a moronic retort.
Oh I see, so the Obama administration not stopping the Clinton campaign from doing that, despite the FBI being ‘informed’ it was going on isn’t the same....? Obama knew about the dossier, how come he didn’t do anything about it?
 
Oh I see, so the Obama administration not stopping the Clinton campaign from doing that, despite the FBI being ‘informed’ it was going on isn’t the same....? Obama knew about the dossier, how come he didn’t do anything about it?
Because it (1) was perfectly, totally legal and (2) it didn't have a damn thing to do with him. Other than that...no idea.
 
Because it (1) was perfectly, totally legal and (2) it didn't have a damn thing to do with him. Other than that...no idea.
It was legal.....the collusion with foreign agents in an attempt to aid an election was legal.

Okay, I’ll remember that if you guys ever try to use that to turnover a Democratically won election.

Is Trump in Ukraine’s corner or is he in Russia’s corner? This is getting so confusing.
 
It was legal.....the collusion with foreign agents in an attempt to aid an election was legal.

Okay, I’ll remember that if you guys ever try to use that to turnover a Democratically won election.

Is Trump in Ukraine’s corner or is he in Russia’s corner? This is getting so confusing.
(1) Yes it was perfectly legal.

(2) What the fvck are you talking about?

(3) Are you really this dumb? Hoping you're a troll. I hate trolls.

(4) Wipe that stuff off your chin.
 
(1) Yes it was perfectly legal.

(2) What the fvck are you talking about?

(3) Are you really this dumb? Hoping you're a troll. I hate trolls.

(4) Wipe that stuff off your chin.
You’re clearly becoming angry because you have today much emotion tied into politics. Likely a TDS type, which is not good.

Now, if you say what they did was legal, then why at all bother with Russiagate if Trumps campaign simply tried to collect dirt on Hillary? Not to mention that what came from Wikileaks’s showed primary rigging, which basically disrupted election integrity at the primary level.

You are used to dealing with HROT level discussions on this type of thing, it’s okay.

I guess I just didn’t realize how simplified the Dems on here actually were.
 
You’re clearly becoming angry because you have today much emotion tied into politics. Likely a TDS type, which is not good.
Do I need to post more LOL's? I'm laughing at you. And the only person here suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome is the sycophantic apologist (that's you, in case you missed it) defending his every action with your mouth fastened firmly to his ass.

Here's your question given your...lol..."deep thinking"...on this. Given the illegalities you claim....where are the charges?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstp1992
Do I need to post more LOL's? I'm laughing at you. And the only person here suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome is the sycophantic apologist (that's you, in case you missed it) defending his every action with your mouth fastened firmly to his ass.

Here's your question given your...lol..."deep thinking"...on this. Given the illegalities you claim....where are the charges?
You’re boring and saying exactly what is expected of someone who echoes from his chamber. It’s a bad faith argument that seeks to simply make your preferred choice look good.

You think you can simply deny the sins one way and then seriously make an argument for it another way.

Russia and Ukraine aren’t exactly buddies. So again I ask, is Trump in their corner or Russia’s? How is it that Putin would be good with him being friendly with the Ukrainians if he’s a Putin puppet?

Do you just bandwagon argue anything negative about the opposition? Are you really in it for the integrity? You think saying you’re laughing at me works? Freshmen? Sophomore?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cougarhawk1
OP: If you don’t have a problem with this thing that wasn’t a bribe, you can’t have a problem with a bribe.
 
Last edited:
You’re boring and saying exactly what is expected of someone who echoes from his chamber. It’s a bad faith argument that seeks to simply make your preferred choice look good.

You think you can simply deny the sins one way and then seriously make an argument for it another way.

Russia and Ukraine aren’t exactly buddies. So again I ask, is Trump in their corner or Russia’s? How is it that Putin would be good with him being friendly with the Ukrainians if he’s a Putin puppet?

Do you just bandwagon argue anything negative about the opposition? Are you really in it for the integrity? You think saying you’re laughing at me works? Freshmen? Sophomore?
Sooo...all of that to admit there aren't any charges for a non-existent crime? Not even from an admin that would LOVE to file charges? As for your moronic question...Trump is in Trump's corner. Always has been. That you still don't get that pretty much cements your stupidity/ Yeah, I'm laughing at you again.
 
Sooo...all of that to admit there aren't any charges for a non-existent crime? Not even from an admin that would LOVE to file charges? As for your moronic question...Trump is in Trump's corner. Always has been. That you still don't get that pretty much cements your stupidity/ Yeah, I'm laughing at you again.
This is boring, very boring. You don’t get the point I’m making, but you will. In time you’ll get it.

I bet you’re one of those types that believe the Kavanaugh ordeal was just about Kavanaugh as a person.

You believe Russiagate was really about collusion worries?

Oh wait I know, I bet you really think the climate change push is about actual climate protections.

Do you believe also there isn’t a very real push into a Socialism heavy society? You think the calls against Communism and such are just scare tactics from ‘the right’?

How lovely.
 
actually hunter biden was a grifter and sucking cash out of Ukraine, while joe threatened them if they investigated Hunters company......now that's been turned on its ear as a "investigation drama scandal smear" by the usual suspects

Saul Alinsky tacticts
You cons always telegraph your sins by blaming dems of exactly what you’re guilty of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rudolph
I don’t think you’re astounded, I just don’t think you know what to say. I think that when we break this down into layers, you’re going to understand that your argument can be sent back at any level you try to come at me with.
Is this when the reptilians come out?
 
It was legal.....the collusion with foreign agents in an attempt to aid an election was legal.

Okay, I’ll remember that if you guys ever try to use that to turnover a Democratically won election.

Is Trump in Ukraine’s corner or is he in Russia’s corner? This is getting so confusing.
We don’t elect our president democratically. We should change that don’t you agree?
 
This is boring, very boring. You don’t get the point I’m making, but you will. In time you’ll get it.

I bet you’re one of those types that believe the Kavanaugh ordeal was just about Kavanaugh as a person.

You believe Russiagate was really about collusion worries?

Oh wait I know, I bet you really think the climate change push is about actual climate protections.

Do you believe also there isn’t a very real push into a Socialism heavy society? You think the calls against Communism and such are just scare tactics from ‘the right’?

How lovely.
29_Dorothy_Parker_Quote_on_boredom_curiosity.jpg
 
You have to love how he’s using something he was outraged about, demanding investigation, in an effort to prove this iTrump bribe is nothing.

that’s how desperate they are at this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: JupiterHawk
actually hunter biden was a grifter and sucking cash out of Ukraine, while joe threatened them if they investigated Hunters company......now that's been turned on its ear as a "investigation drama scandal smear" by the usual suspects

Saul Alinsky tacticts

Joe was actually asking Ukraine to fire the prosecutor for inaction against corruption
 
We don’t elect our president democratically. We should change that don’t you agree?
No, the country isn’t ran off the same needs that LA and New York need.
Those cities are quite literally the cesspools of the elite, bad policy, crime, pollution, and bad decisions. Electoral college takes into account that different areas actually get a say.

You want to win solely based on the popular vote? Then allow more than just two main candidates in the general election. If it’s really about popularity and “Democracy” let’s see who the real candidate of the people is.
 
No, the country isn’t ran off the same needs that LA and New York need.
Those cities are quite literally the cesspools of the elite, bad policy, crime, pollution, and bad decisions. Electoral college takes into account that different areas actually get a say.

You want to win solely based on the popular vote? Then allow more than just two main candidates in the general election. If it’s really about popularity and “Democracy” let’s see who the real candidate of the people is.
Great, then we shan’t get too worked up about overturning an undemocratic election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rudolph
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT