Iowa has won 4 NCAA tournament games.
Is that good?
Discuss.
Is that good?
Discuss.
Not good. Iowa has yet to be within single digits at halftime of second round game.Iowa has won 4 NCAA tournament games.
Is that good?
Discuss.
With wins over Davidson, Temple, Grand Canyon and Cincinnati.....other than Cincinnati, with was technically an upset, not a real impressive list of victories.Iowa has won 4 NCAA tournament games.
Is that good?
Discuss.
6 the first 3 years with Raveling recruits.By way of comparison, Dr. Tom won 13 NCAA tournament games in 13 seasons.
In case anyone was curious.
The man could coach.6 the first 3 years with Raveling recruits.
7 the last 10 years.
So, if we take out Dr. Tom’s first three years, he still has 3 more NCAA tournament victories in 10 years than Fran does in 14 years.6 the first 3 years with Raveling recruits.
7 the last 10 years.
And if we take Fran’s last 10 years he has three wins playing his kids in front of NBAers.So, if we take out Dr. Tom’s first three years, he still has 3 more NCAA tournament victories in 10 years than Fran does in 14 years.
As BearHawk said, that would get any coach at this level canned.The answer is a resounding no. But I know that you already knew that.
I suspect even those on here who inexplicably still want to see Fran continue as coach would at least admit that is unimpressive.
Yep. And the same amount Lute had his last 4 years.So, if we take out Dr. Tom’s first three years, he still has 3 more NCAA tournament victories in 10 years than Fran does in 14 years.
Not good. 😕So, if we take out Dr. Tom’s first three years, he still has 3 more NCAA tournament victories in 10 years than Fran does in 14 years.
At this point, I don’t think Beth has much choice. Attendance is just going to keep getting worse, which is sad because Carver was always rocking when I was growing up.If Fran stays he needs to say goodbye to assistant coach Sherman Dillard, he's been with Fran for the entire time at Iowa and I'm not sure he's worth the money they pay him, of coarse we all know Fran is over paid, hire a replacement coach that can make sense of the portal and get better players of need.
Next years roster needs to be extensively altered.
No longer will Iowa have Payton Sanford, Doug Thelwell, Even Brauns, and tell Riley Mulvey to hit the road, you could also give Carter Kingsbury the hook too. That will give Iowa 5 scholarships to work with for the new assistant coach to get at least 2 - 7 footers, another point guard and a experienced 6-9 or 6-10 forward. Rebounding has to be the priority in the off season.
Fran has to change the way he coaches, no more motion offense, no more position less basketball, of course that won't happen but if Iowa is to ever regain respectability and become a player in the BIG TEN, Fran needs to change the way he coaches....yeah, that's going to happen.
OR, Beth could do the right thing and give Fran his walking papers after this season ends? That would be the actual solution, but then Beth would have to do her job and make the right hire to elevate Iowa's men's basketball program to try and match the level of the woman's team. Does she have the urgency to make that happen? Probably not, stay tuned.
Dr. Tom was overall a very average coach and his recruiting was fair to poor most of the time.6 the first 3 years with Raveling recruits.
7 the last 10 years.
The man could coa
But TD didn't make the NCAA in 3 of the last 5 years before being told that his contract wasn't being renewed. Didn't even make the NIT in one of those years. That's why he was shown the door. Fran should be shown the door as well if he doesn't go away on his own.The man could coach.
7 in 10 years including a sweet 16 is better than 4 in 14 and no sweet16.6 the first 3 years with Raveling recruits.
7 the last 10 years.
Does it really need to be a comparison between Davis and Fran? That's like arguing who was the best 4th place Olympic sprinter of all time. Iowa has been to one sweet sixteen since George's recruits moved on.7 in 10 years including a sweet 16 is better than 4 in 14 and no sweet16.
Raveling is the unsung hero.
1979-1989 lots of fun. 4 sweet 16's. 10 NCAA tournament appearances.7 in 10 years including a sweet 16 is better than 4 in 14 and no sweet16.
Raveling is the unsung hero.
Raveling should have made a career out of being an assistant coach in charge of recruiting7 in 10 years including a sweet 16 is better than 4 in 14 and no sweet16.
Raveling is the unsung hero.
I will quibble with this.Dr. Tom was overall a very average coach and his recruiting was fair to poor most of the time.
This X 1000And if we take Fran’s last 10 years he has three wins playing his kids in front of NBAers.
Agree with this. We saw what Davis was able to do with better talent. He still landed some nice players, but it never got back to the level of the late 80s.I will quibble with this.
Dr. Tom was a good coach. He was just an average to subpar recruiter. The Chris Street tragedy was devastating and the program never really recovered.
It’s been discussed.Iowa has won 4 NCAA tournament games.
Is that good?
Discuss.
Damn lucky to beat Temple too.With wins over Davidson, Temple, Grand Canyon and Cincinnati.....other than Cincinnati, with was technically an upset, not a real impressive list of victories.
I don't really have anything against Fran, he got Iowa past the Lickliter years and back to respectability, but kind of feel like Iowa has leveled off and we parted ways with Davis when he had much more success than Fran has had.
Upper division finishesIowa has won 4 NCAA tournament games.
Is that good?
Discuss.
Upper division finishes
High character student athletes
Ice cream
Not Todd Lickliter
Go root for Iowa State, you troll
Did I miss anything?
7 in 10 is still better than 4 in 156 the first 3 years with Raveling recruits.
7 the last 10 years.
Iowa has won 4 NCAA tournament games.
Is that good?
Discuss.
If my memory isn't failing me, they didn't exactly roll past Grand Canyon either.Damn lucky to beat Temple too.
Richmond was worse than losing to Oregon. That Richmond team wasn't sniffing the tournament had they not won their conference tournament.If my memory isn't failing me, they didn't exactly roll past Grand Canyon either.
The fact that Fran couldn't (at the very least) reach the Sweet16 with the roster he had that season/postseason should have seen him canned for coaching malfeasance. His best shot, talent-wise and they flamed out hard in the 2nd round as a TWO SEED.
I don't think I'll ever not be ****ing ticked off about that, or the next season when the Murray twins were sophomores and went into the NCAA Tourney as arguably the hottest team in the land - coming off winning the BTT - only to fall flat on their faces and shatter their noses in that travesty vs Richmond.
I must agree, at least in terms of strength of opponent.Richmond was worse than losing to Oregon. That Richmond team wasn't sniffing the tournament had they not won their conference tournament.
Richmond should have been seeded around 14. Lost their next game by 28. S. Dakota St. the 13 seed in bracket was much better.Richmond was worse than losing to Oregon. That Richmond team wasn't sniffing the tournament had they not won their conference tournament.
I'd say quite a bit better.7 in 10 is still better than 4 in 15
If the 4 wins were all in a single season, it would be very good. 3 in a season? Good. If even 2 were in a single season it would be ok.Iowa has won 4 NCAA tournament games.
Is that good?
Discuss.